by Yank Man » Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:17 pm
by Pacman » Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:52 pm
Yank Man wrote:Enough Div 7 posters. Let's all move on or we will be the next thread to be shut down by FC. This weeks games present some
beauties. TTG(2nd) v North Pines(5th). Gullies would not want to drop too far behind the Lions and repay the spiders for their first round loss, and Nth Pines need to consolidate their position in the 5. Should be a fantastic game. Mitchell Pk play their "local derby" against Shoc and regardless of ladder positions it is always a game both teams get up for. Angle Vale are in a bit of a trough and meet an up and about Flinders Pk who can take their spot in the 5 with a win. Saturday will go a long way to determining the finals aspirants so good luck in your quests guys.
by Pacman » Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:53 pm
Haynzy wrote:Pacman wrote:Haynzy wrote:Yank Man wrote:Nice set of smoke and mirrors Bigshow82. Callington havn't won a game for 3 years and some by over 50 goals, your team sheet suggests one change from you belting of Angle Vale last week. You will be in the 5 tomorrow night with another nice percentage booster against a slowing Shoc. Make no mistake, you and Gullies are the "in" teams at the minute. We know you are both coming. What about Gullies having the luxury of resting big Chambo for their clash against Modbury, mind you they have a quality side without him with all the guns back and I would suggest Haynsy wants that goalkicking trophy at season end.Good luck tomorrow to all teams in what may be trying conditions and sorry Reds, but it would be good for the comp if Smithfield get a win for all the hard work they are putting in. Play hard but fair boys.
I'm going to encourage that they rest Chambo as much as possible Yank Man, because it will only take him a couple of weeks to overtake my goal tally.
Haha.... well said Bobby!! Should be a forward line that can share the goals across 4-5 for the rest of the year one thinks with the players still to come in!!!
Let's hope so. I didn't think there was anyone else from Gullies on here, but you must be if you call me Bobby.
I didn't realise a complaint was put in from our club. I just vented some of my frustration on this forum.
by morell » Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:36 am
This comment surprises me given a few knowns that I wont share on the forum for your sake Yanky.Yank Man wrote:The bench had no real issue with the said umpire and he did the best he could under difficult circumstances. If we had a problem then I would be the first to submit a formal complaint, trust me.
Which is another reason why he needs to be removed from umpiring AV games. For everyone's sake. He gets to move on and further his umpiring career - which I think has a bright future. AV get increased probity. The opposition get a fair go - even perception wise. The SAAFL get to mitigate riskYank Man wrote:Seriously I would not want to be their club umpire and with a good chat with him in the rooms after the game you get the feeling he is at his witsend.
On the contrary. The PM's and replies I have had to the posts in this thread have been unprecedented in regards to their 100% support from other clubs. In fact the only person who hasnt agreed with me is the coach of the club I am part of! hahahaYank Man wrote:Sorry Footy Chick but morrell is on his own with this one.
by Footy Smart » Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:47 am
BPwizard wrote:Fair call Morrell, i have and players have mentioned it puts brett in a terrible situation that he umpires b grade as club umpire and then umpires A grade as a SAAFL umpire. i and quite a few players have said same as you that he would be better umpiring higher grades. But i don t think his umpiring has resulted in a win for Angle Vale in anyway and i think if people looking in from a neutral supporter of both teams would say he can sometimes be harder on the Vale players.
But if your club or any other club who has a problem with Angle Vale situation, had it reversed that it was ur or there club with the umpiring situation, you would be the club taking all the crap over this i believe it is wrong aswell but, it is easier for other clubs and supportes to have a witch hunt online in a forum.
As for the game on saturday the first all in started from a high tackle on the MP player, who then retaliated ( which i would have done aswell) but the both players from each team come in and caused a bigger reaction and i was suprised only one player sent off with most likely 20 players involved. i seen another vale player throw a few punches and a few MP players aswell so was suprised only the one sent off. The other umpire on the day did not want to try and controll the game i think brett try to controll it and i have no problems with his calls. And as for our captain being sent of twice that will be dealt with by the leadership group as that is not tolerated at Angle Vale Football Club.
And as for the so called modbury game where modbury tryed to come out and rough up the smaller Vale players, which back fired and the score lined showed that. with the events about the player who was king hit which a king hit to me is like a sniper but when hit face to face is a fight. The tribunal took care of that matter and the player recieved 1 week as it was classed at the lower end of the scale, the so called abuse from the coach was directed at the umpire to get the game going again as the player leaving the field with the trainers with no blood or stretcher used the play can not be held up to by umpire. And the comment was lets get the game going not our fault he wanted to sleep on the oval. And with the modbury coach winging about the umpiring all game it does start to piss me off as Brett is not to blame for the situtation that everyone feels is wrong the club and league have put him in. Two many people wanna wing and i believe thats why a few things where said to the modbury coach thru the game.
I think everyone should stop whinging about brett as he is not on this forum to defend himself, and pretty low of people to complain and judge someone behind there back. If you have issues take it up with the league or contact the president of Angle Vale i am sure he is happy to listen to any complaints. I have seen worst umpires in this d7 comp and none talks about them with there name splatted over the pages.
We dont have a game without the umps and i don t think in d7 a couple of bad calls are gunna cost a game.
by morell » Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:02 am
Thanks for replying BPwizard. I agree with this comment. Perhaps as part of a collaborative push to the SAAFL a segment be included supporting Brett as an umpire moving up the ranks.BPwizard wrote:Fair call Morrell, i have and players have mentioned it puts brett in a terrible situation that he umpires b grade as club umpire and then umpires A grade as a SAAFL umpire. i and quite a few players have said same as you that he would be better umpiring higher grades.
Agree. However that’s not the issue, it’s entirely related to human perception.BPwizard wrote:But i don t think his umpiring has resulted in a win for Angle Vale in anyway and i think if people looking in from a neutral supporter of both teams would say he can sometimes be harder on the Vale players.
I hope you have been able to see that this type of thinking is exactly what I was trying to avoid. It’s not a witch hunt, it’s a corrective action to prevent further issues.BPwizard wrote:But if your club or any other club who has a problem with Angle Vale situation, had it reversed that it was ur or there club with the umpiring situation, you would be the club taking all the crap over this i believe it is wrong aswell but, it is easier for other clubs and supportes to have a witch hunt online in a forum.
I agree! Actions > Words. Which is what I am trying to encourage.BPwizard wrote:I think everyone should stop whinging about brett
I haven’t seen any judging, if anything there has been a large degree of support for Brett!BPwizard wrote:as he is not on this forum to defend himself, and pretty low of people to complain and judge someone behind there back.
As have I. This isn’t about Brett or his umpiring, it’s about perception, which rightly or wrongly is leading to violence.BPwizard wrote:If you have issues take it up with the league or contact the president of Angle Vale i am sure he is happy to listen to any complaints. I have seen worst umpires in this d7 comp and none talks about them with there name splatted over the pages.
I don’t think I or anyone have said otherwise. This isn’t a complaint about missed free kicks or umpiring incompetence. That is absolutely unfair on Brett and irrelevant.BPwizard wrote:We dont have a game without the umps and i don t think in d7 a couple of bad calls are gunna cost a game.
by BPwizard » Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:07 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jul 04, 2012 9:03 am
BPwizard wrote:Well said morell. I agree with ur opinion, it has some gr8 points.
Footy Smart your name says it all discussion about umpire and you try to turn it around about Angle Vale and on field violence which ur club tried to rough up but now crying as you lost the game and the fight i say as any coach would say back up your team mates as simple as that. Ur the second poster from Modbury who has tried to bring up shit that happens on the field, shit that happens on the field should stay on the field old school way is the only way.
Enough said i agree with Yank Man should be talking about how 2nd to 5th is gunna shape up at the end of the year. Looks interesting over next few weeks.
by Footy Smart » Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:01 am
BPwizard wrote:Well said morell. I agree with ur opinion, it has some gr8 points.
Footy Smart your name says it all discussion about umpire and you try to turn it around about Angle Vale and on field violence which ur club tried to rough up but now crying as you lost the game and the fight i say as any coach would say back up your team mates as simple as that. Ur the second poster from Modbury who has tried to bring up shit that happens on the field, shit that happens on the field should stay on the field old school way is the only way.
Enough said i agree with Yank Man should be talking about how 2nd to 5th is gunna shape up at the end of the year. Looks interesting over next few weeks.
by marbles » Wed Jul 04, 2012 11:12 am
by BPwizard » Wed Jul 04, 2012 11:19 am
by BPwizard » Wed Jul 04, 2012 11:21 am
by BPwizard » Wed Jul 04, 2012 11:25 am
by Bigshow82 » Wed Jul 04, 2012 11:28 am
marbles wrote:Pretty hard round to tip the winners this week?
Every game could go either way
Can North Pines knock off gullies?
Id back flinders park to beat angle vale normally but the travel out to gawler could set the reds asleep?
Is this the week flinders uni will score their first win? They make great plays but if they just crunched the opposition and not let them prance around the crabs would be much more fearsome (its not touch footy boys)
The sharks at modbury hmmm? What page in the street directory?
And Shocs Id never write off especially in the southern derby, could their cream of recent years finally rise in 2012 to knock the lions off at sacred heights?
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jul 04, 2012 11:29 am
BPwizard wrote:Totally agree with you Lightning. But was not condoning voilence said that if something happens team mates should have there back. That is how all teams would react.
What would be the percentages of onfield voilence these days to old days compared to the number of players and teams around now, i would say it would be low. Football is a contact sport and fustration is always going to play apart in the violent acts. But i would say it would be lower then the old days. Also ask most players and they still say what happens onfield should stay onfield.
I find it funny that older guys who played in the days where coathangers, kinghits where apart of footy know frown on it when it was there era. Footy is so much cleaner these days then it ever has and players still hit ball hard but with fairness, but when someone is fouled wrongly does not take much for players on thier team to fire up that is apart of a team sport.
True Footysmart a conflict of interest is their but he is more professionall umpire and i spoke to the club last nite and voiced concern over it for what i have read on here in the last 48 hours so lets c what happens. I think if it is to change and for the better of Angle Vale football Club the club needs to act with the league on this matter. I have said since round one to players it is a shit position for the club to be in and i always new it would reflect on the club in some way.
by morell » Wed Jul 04, 2012 11:32 am
Daishy was walking around after the game looking a bit sorry for himself but seemingly OK. I asked how he was and he said he had a bit of a headache but was fine.BPwizard wrote:Yank man
The few players that scene head clash on the weekend asked how is the player doing. Hope it was only concussion not anything to serious.
by Pacman » Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:43 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:BPwizard wrote:Totally agree with you Lightning. But was not condoning voilence said that if something happens team mates should have there back. That is how all teams would react.
What would be the percentages of onfield voilence these days to old days compared to the number of players and teams around now, i would say it would be low. Football is a contact sport and fustration is always going to play apart in the violent acts. But i would say it would be lower then the old days. Also ask most players and they still say what happens onfield should stay onfield.
I find it funny that older guys who played in the days where coathangers, kinghits where apart of footy know frown on it when it was there era. Footy is so much cleaner these days then it ever has and players still hit ball hard but with fairness, but when someone is fouled wrongly does not take much for players on thier team to fire up that is apart of a team sport.
True Footysmart a conflict of interest is their but he is more professionall umpire and i spoke to the club last nite and voiced concern over it for what i have read on here in the last 48 hours so lets c what happens. I think if it is to change and for the better of Angle Vale football Club the club needs to act with the league on this matter. I have said since round one to players it is a shit position for the club to be in and i always new it would reflect on the club in some way.
He'd pretty hard pushed to get a game close by to go to after doing the B's, Brett enjoys umpiring he does a good job of it, I hope there's an appropriate solution that see's all parties happy.
Perhaps your B's could start 15 minutes earlier to give him a chance to get to another ground in time for the A's, the SAAFL needs blokes like this umpiring, Brett was a good honest footballer but age caught up with him, this is his way of staying in the game.
It is a hard gig doing the same side every week, that's why I opted out and joined a neutral league where I have no affiliation, in saying that, Brett has never played footy for Angle Vale.
On another note, when are the owls going to be nesting in their own tree?
by dee man » Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:11 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:53 pm
Pacman wrote:
McQueen.... this would only be possible if the lad owned a Delorian and could get it up to 85 mp/h.... He umpires for Angle Vale, which is a fair way out north to get to another ground in time to umpire a game that begins pretty much straight after the B's/D's finish.... Especially considering the umpires need to report a good time before their game actually starts.... If the SAAFL decide that he shouldnt umpire AV A grade games then I think he needs to make the decision of being a club umpire and do their B's or continue on as a SAAFL umpire and aim to work his way up the grades...
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |