gothebombers wrote:def superstar

by hawkseye » Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:40 pm
gothebombers wrote:def superstar
by gothebombers » Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:43 pm
hawkseye wrote:gothebombers wrote:def superstar
This is too much
by GWW » Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:43 pm
gothebombers wrote:def superstar
by gothebombers » Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:46 pm
GWW wrote:gothebombers wrote:def superstar
Well if they play over 200 games in a strong Hawthorn side they're likely to be a superstar, and most ex SA players (presuming its an ex SA player) who've played at Hawthorn have been champions. Anyway, we're not supposed to discuss posters ID's so i'll leave it at that
by GWW » Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:48 pm
by gothebombers » Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:52 pm
GWW wrote:He may have, but in that instance you wouldn't have typed (afl) would you
by hawkseye » Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:53 pm
GWW wrote:He may have, but in that instance you wouldn't have typed (afl) would you
by BUZZ » Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:54 pm
GWW wrote:He may have, but in that instance you wouldn't have typed (afl) would you
by hawkseye » Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:59 pm
BUZZ wrote:GWW wrote:He may have, but in that instance you wouldn't have typed (afl) would you
Modbury Hawks i think???
I am now convinced the league side will beat an amature side, but the jury is still out on the reserves.
by gothebombers » Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:04 pm
by Chris Finneman » Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:43 pm
by gothebombers » Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:53 pm
Chris Finneman wrote:I reckon the a sanfl b grade team would beat an a1 side by 10 goals, they would just run over the top of them due to superior fitness.
by Bold Strategy » Mon Mar 24, 2008 5:17 pm
gothebombers wrote:reserves are reserves and league is the best 21 in most instances. i dont think any league side would loose to an amateur side. but reserves would be different..these days a lot of the reserves sides are full of 19 yo where the good saafl sides are full of good 20 to 30 yo.. if you look at most of the reserves sides these days, there wouldnt be many over 20. tim wetherald fr sturt would be a great example where he quit sturt in lieu of having to prove himself as a 30 yo to regain his spot.(quit sturt thurs after being named in the twos and not guarr a spot in the 1 s) there are some exeptions injury etc but if your playing ressies at 25 + well you prob wont make it
by am Bays » Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:10 pm
by Not Scared » Wed Mar 26, 2008 7:17 pm
by gothebombers » Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:03 pm
by silent hour » Thu Mar 27, 2008 7:38 am
Not Scared wrote:I have played both reserves and div. 1 footy and believe that a top div. 1 team, i.e. Goodwood's current line up, would win the flag in SANFL reserves. The reserves teams would have fitness on their side, but as other posters said, they are made up of a lot of young inexperienced guys, most of whom don't end up making the grade at league level, and lots of whom (I know of plenty) end up playing at a lot lower standard than div. 1.
Div. 1 teams, on the other hand, contain some experienced players who would walk all over anyone playing reserves footy, and some who would even dominate league footy. Admittedly, they drop off more depth wise as well.
As for a div. 1 team playing a league team, forget about it. The bottom team would get over them by 10 goals and the others by a lot more. They may have some average players, but they would have a better spread of top end players.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |