hey LM..congrats on your new "job" i didnt see when it was origianlly posted..good to have one of "our" boys with some power now

Cheers mate, the thread didn't last long before it turned into a schmozzle.
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:49 am
by EB53 » Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:13 pm
by aceman » Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:26 pm
candyman wrote:Half right there Aceman but there is a difference between keeping everyone happy and being incompetent.
Your are right that one can not keep everyone happy and people in a position like that should not try to.
But this guy seems totally incompetent. Reading the host of posts about him over the last year suggests
that it is possibly not just a case of "not keeping everyone happy". Played 3 seasons ago in SAAFL before
going south and hewas disliked then, but this dislike has grown to differing levels now. Seems like it is
far more than a dislike. Can you see one post this year that supports him in anything that he has done?????
Am sure you would have the answers there Aceman, you seem to know everything OR think you do
by Rotter » Sat Nov 22, 2008 9:23 pm
by NO-MERCY » Sat Nov 22, 2008 10:24 pm
by Rotter » Sat Nov 22, 2008 10:46 pm
Shadiac or Burchell, don't answer thatNO-MERCY wrote:I think its plain simple,
Just f--k him off & no doubt our League will improve & move forward.
by NO-MERCY » Sun Nov 23, 2008 12:10 am
Rotter wrote:Shadiac or Burchell, don't answer thatNO-MERCY wrote:I think its plain simple,
Just f--k him off & no doubt our League will improve & move forward.![]()
![]()
by The Big Shrek » Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:03 pm
Rotter wrote:I've got this third hand but I wonder how Shadiac will act to the fact it has been identified that Ellis Burchell has re-used his 2006 nomination form for the 2008/9 SAAFL Executive and worse still, simply whited out the old dates and substituted current ones so you would imagine he knew what he was doing was wrong. Hardly the behaviour of someone supposed to be representing the interests of our competition.
by The Big Shrek » Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:07 pm
by Rotter » Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:26 pm
Shrek, are you asking or tellingThe Big Shrek wrote:Rotter wrote:I've got this third hand but I wonder how Shadiac will act to the fact it has been identified that Ellis Burchell has re-used his 2006 nomination form for the 2008/9 SAAFL Executive and worse still, simply whited out the old dates and substituted current ones so you would imagine he knew what he was doing was wrong. Hardly the behaviour of someone supposed to be representing the interests of our competition.
Just to clarify this, the reason he used the old form is because the people who nominated him in 2006 are unwilling to do it again.
by The Big Shrek » Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:31 pm
Rotter wrote:Shrek, are you asking or tellingThe Big Shrek wrote:Rotter wrote:I've got this third hand but I wonder how Shadiac will act to the fact it has been identified that Ellis Burchell has re-used his 2006 nomination form for the 2008/9 SAAFL Executive and worse still, simply whited out the old dates and substituted current ones so you would imagine he knew what he was doing was wrong. Hardly the behaviour of someone supposed to be representing the interests of our competition.
Just to clarify this, the reason he used the old form is because the people who nominated him in 2006 are unwilling to do it again.
by Rotter » Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:35 pm
Sheer laziness I suppose or a complete lack of respect for protocol. Either way it doesn't matter.The Big Shrek wrote:Rotter wrote:Shrek, are you asking or tellingThe Big Shrek wrote:Rotter wrote:I've got this third hand but I wonder how Shadiac will act to the fact it has been identified that Ellis Burchell has re-used his 2006 nomination form for the 2008/9 SAAFL Executive and worse still, simply whited out the old dates and substituted current ones so you would imagine he knew what he was doing was wrong. Hardly the behaviour of someone supposed to be representing the interests of our competition.
Just to clarify this, the reason he used the old form is because the people who nominated him in 2006 are unwilling to do it again.
It's what I was told. Is there any other reason to do it?
by The Big Shrek » Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:38 pm
by The Big Shrek » Wed Nov 26, 2008 9:20 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |