Jumper Clash Rule Changed

[The Big Shrek]

Now I see, it's good work from Head Honchos when you agree with it.
But.....it's not when you disagree....

Yes, that makes sense doesn't it? Thankyou for stating the obvious!

Or am I meant to say they're useless when I agree with them?

[finn]

its a ridiculous rule as it opens up an enormous can of worms regarding clubs ability to abuse it

ie what's to stop a club rushing 7 b graders across to the c grade in a tight game? start with 18 and fill up - 7 players can make a much larger difference than 3.

what happens in finals regarding players missing out in the b grade if their c grade is in the finals -as it stands players are allowed to play provided there is no gap between grades even if only minimal games have been played lower.

what's wrong with going to 22 or 23 first to see how it goes? and why not introduce it across all grades? i just think it was poorly thought through.

if you're worried about a few players sticking around rotate the lower grades so people have stand downs - its what happens at uni.

[aceman]

I believe this was passed at the last meeting
Starts this year

Some extra revenue for the apparel licensees.

There is one who can't meet his timelines now so how will they cope with extra work.
Taking 10-12 weeks to get SAAFL socks, that went down well, pig's ar$e.
Could be a big shakeup when the renewals are up for grabs, a couple won't reapply and a couple of newies might throw their hat in the ring.

SAAFL should have stayed with JAX Sports.

They had enough issues of their own when they were doing it. Is Danny giving you a 'sling' to stay onside with him Shrek?

[The Big Shrek]

No, he was just very professional, easy to deal with and punctual when the uni colleges ordered stuff through him.

[carey18]

its a ridiculous rule as it opens up an enormous can of worms regarding clubs ability to abuse it

ie what's to stop a club rushing 7 b graders across to the c grade in a tight game? start with 18 and fill up - 7 players can make a much larger difference than 3.

what happens in finals regarding players missing out in the b grade if their c grade is in the finals -as it stands players are allowed to play provided there is no gap between grades even if only minimal games have been played lower.

what's wrong with going to 22 or 23 first to see how it goes? and why not introduce it across all grades? i just think it was poorly thought through.

if you're worried about a few players sticking around rotate the lower grades so people have stand downs - its what happens at uni.

Y rush players from the B grade when you can just sand bag in the C grade with the old he only wants to play with his mates crap?

[finn]

its a ridiculous rule as it opens up an enormous can of worms regarding clubs ability to abuse it

ie what's to stop a club rushing 7 b graders across to the c grade in a tight game? start with 18 and fill up - 7 players can make a much larger difference than 3.

what happens in finals regarding players missing out in the b grade if their c grade is in the finals -as it stands players are allowed to play provided there is no gap between grades even if only minimal games have been played lower.

what's wrong with going to 22 or 23 first to see how it goes? and why not introduce it across all grades? i just think it was poorly thought through.

if you're worried about a few players sticking around rotate the lower grades so people have stand downs - its what happens at uni.

Y rush players from the B grade when you can just sand bag in the C grade with the old he only wants to play with his mates crap?

??

do believe i was talking about people coming down rather than those starting in that grade. nice try though.

[JS SPORTS]

I believe this was passed at the last meeting
Starts this year

Some extra revenue for the apparel licensees.

There is one who can't meet his timelines now so how will they cope with extra work.
Taking 10-12 weeks to get SAAFL socks, that went down well, pig's ar$e.
Could be a big shakeup when the renewals are up for grabs, a couple won't reapply and a couple of newies might throw their hat in the ring.

SAAFL should have stayed with JAX Sports.

They have, still going through the courts I believe for non payment unless an 'out of court' settlement has been made. Nothing showed up in the AGM financials because a couple of delegates would have been all over that like a $2.00 suit.

[gothebombers]

i thought they could name 25 players, on the team sheet but still have to play the 21 players they have, not play 25. i may be wrong but its more of a qualifying thing for the c s.....it makes it totally unfair if a struggling side only has21 players against a side that has 25...thats why i believe its named numbers only. still will be 21 on the field each

[Road to Glory]

i thought they could name 25 players, on the team sheet but still have to play the 21 players they have, not play 25. i may be wrong but its more of a qualifying thing for the c s.....it makes it totally unfair if a struggling side only has21 players against a side that has 25...thats why i believe its named numbers only. still will be 21 on the field each

wow they get 21 players on the field each?? that wouldnt leave much space on the oval with the extra 6 players lol

[gothebombers]

ok 18 on the field 3 on the bench...doh