X Runna wrote:X Runna wrote:Hardy Hit wrote:portland definatley have the wood over mitcham so it would be an upset, judging on the past 2yrs
Portland couldn't beat Mitcham this week if their life depended on it.
There ya go................
No excuses from where i sit Xrunna, only ourselves to blame. Severe lack of discipline (continuous mouthing off at ump) cost us dearly in the end, but the better side probably won on the day. We came back twice from sizeable margins, think we were 30 points down early in the last. Cracking game of footy, 24 goals were kicked between the 2 sides in the first half (13 to 11 i think). It was as quick and free flowing footy as i have seen at Port Reserve for a few years. Second half became more a scrap, but still a good contest. Mitcham very quick side, that can burst a game wide open within minutes. The Hawks did seem to run out of puff, for the second week in a row i believe, but that would happen with the type of footy they are trying to play. There was some kind of issue with the score at games end aswell, the goal umps and both clubs officials had different scorelines, but all just added to the drama. The rivalry between us and Mitcham thickens !!! Good stuff !!!
Xrunna, seems these 'rumours' Piccachu mentioned about you blokes are gaining legs. Someone mentioned something about it to me on the weekend, and i actually take this person serious (unlike Piccachu

).
Have you blokes lost some players over the last few weeks due to payment issues ? Person i spoke to was adament you have. Dont shoot the messenger by the way, just stating whats obviously getting talked about around the traps.
Turbo, Walkies B grade are very good. Thought they would beat you, but not by so much !!! They do resemble an A grade side, thats for sure !
