SAAFL Div 2 & 2R (2009)

[nuggety goodness]

You'd think they'd try and get the investigation done before the div 2 medal count as taylor will certainly get games but may have already won the medal. will the league take the medal off him when he is found guilty?

And if found guilty, he has played the 3 games (including this week). If EP make the Gf he would then play that too, then possibly get rubbed out for say 4 weeks?? Anyone else think this is bloody stupid. No matter what player or team involved!!!!!

Have you forgotten that a person is "innocent until proven guilty" irrespective of your personal thoughts or perceived facts?

Not on here mate !!

shoot first ask questions later....

[itsmyclub]

Can anyone find Boozehound please???????

At the Balaklava Races and the boys have had to hold the Bus up for him for half an hour. The bus driver not happy and decided
to go without the Boozehound. All the rest of the boys still looking for him. Missing in Action.

How is he getting home??????? (Long Taxi Ride Home from Balaklava Boozehound) - ha ha

[itsmyclub]

anyone found Boozehound yet??????????????????????

[boozehound]

here he is.....not sure quichey is feeling well thooooo.....boozehound was on the bus no probs.....

you people talking about taylor...get a life. if he wins he wins. bullshit story anyway.

[itsmyclub]

here he is.....not sure quichey is feeling well thooooo.....boozehound was on the bus no probs.....

you people talking about taylor...get a life. if he wins he wins. bullshit story anyway.

You and Dutchy and Quichey were just drunks we hear. Can only imagine if the Felch, Pag, Riddler and Shrek were with you

Hope Mr magoo was in good touch as well at the Races

[GFP]

here he is.....not sure quichey is feeling well thooooo.....boozehound was on the bus no probs.....

you people talking about taylor...get a life. if he wins he wins. bullshit story anyway.

whatever buddy, I think the fact that there is an investigation about the incident is worthy of discussion on the forum. something obviously occurred, and as taylor is currently a favourite for the medal, it should be discussed what happens if he gets done. you surely can't have a winner who has been found guilty of headbutting and spitting blood on an opposition player.

[oldslow]

here he is.....not sure quichey is feeling well thooooo.....boozehound was on the bus no probs.....

you people talking about taylor...get a life. if he wins he wins. bullshit story anyway.

whatever buddy, I think the fact that there is an investigation about the incident is worthy of discussion on the forum. something obviously occurred, and as taylor is currently a favourite for the medal, it should be discussed what happens if he gets done. you surely can't have a winner who has been found guilty of headbutting and spitting blood on an opposition player.

Nobody has been found guily of anything only by you tossers on here that like to slag someone off or the fun of it. If the SAAFL has put it of to the end of the season there can't have been much in it or no evidence.

[aceman]

here he is.....not sure quichey is feeling well thooooo.....boozehound was on the bus no probs.....

you people talking about taylor...get a life. if he wins he wins. bullshit story anyway.

whatever buddy, I think the fact that there is an investigation about the incident is worthy of discussion on the forum. something obviously occurred, and as taylor is currently a favourite for the medal, it should be discussed what happens if he gets done. you surely can't have a winner who has been found guilty of headbutting and spitting blood on an opposition player.

Nobody has been found guily of anything only by you tossers on here that like to slag someone off or the fun of it. If the SAAFL has put it of to the end of the season there can't have been much in it or no evidence.

OS, I said similar to that and you "shot me down" by saying 'not on here'! What is this, double standards or what?

[aceman]

here he is.....not sure quichey is feeling well thooooo.....boozehound was on the bus no probs.....

you people talking about taylor...get a life. if he wins he wins. bullshit story anyway.

BH, you'd best do an additional 20 laps to run out yesterdays grog if you reckon you'll get a kick on Saturday.
A bit warmer, it'll be running out of you like a tap!

[bandar]

Would they change a winning side and bring BH in?

[Cooperskid]

Great to See that Broadies will be back in Div 1 next year. I think they will need to work on having a much more competitive reserves side, if they want to give div 1 a real shake. The A's have had no real support from the B's for the past few years. Need to pick up a swag of players who can make the reserves team competitive!

[oldslow]

here he is.....not sure quichey is feeling well thooooo.....boozehound was on the bus no probs.....

you people talking about taylor...get a life. if he wins he wins. bullshit story anyway.

whatever buddy, I think the fact that there is an investigation about the incident is worthy of discussion on the forum. something obviously occurred, and as taylor is currently a favourite for the medal, it should be discussed what happens if he gets done. you surely can't have a winner who has been found guilty of headbutting and spitting blood on an opposition player.

Nobody has been found guily of anything only by you tossers on here that like to slag someone off or the fun of it. If the SAAFL has put it of to the end of the season there can't have been much in it or no evidence.

OS, I said similar to that and you "shot me down" by saying 'not on here'! What is this, double standards or what?

Read it again I was agreeing with you. My point was people on here (always the same stirrers) make up their minds from crap they hear as they hide behind log in nicks. If you want to say someone is guilty of an act put your name to it so you can be responsible for your comments if you are wrong. Weak as piss. Like I said I agreed with your comment.

[stimpy]

put a name to it you reckon oldslow? well how about the broadview footy club as a name then? quite a few of their players seem to be very upset with what happened (my apologies mr sensitive, what "allegedly" happened). and they are speaking very strongly of it.
now why would the saafl delay the hearing you say, how bout why would broadview be pushing so hard for it maybe?

[boozehound]

name the players that are prepared to stand up at the tribunal and say it happened.......

[GFP]

Read it again I was agreeing with you. My point was people on here (always the same stirrers) make up their minds from crap they hear as they hide behind log in nicks. If you want to say someone is guilty of an act put your name to it so you can be responsible for your comments if you are wrong. Weak as piss. Like I said I agreed with your comment.

So you have Eastern Park saying he didn't do it and Broadview saying he did. Will the people who say he didn't do it be held responsible to their comments if he is found guilty.

Oldslow, if you don't like reading other peoples opinions on what happened then maybe a forum isn't for you.

[oldslow]

Read it again I was agreeing with you. My point was people on here (always the same stirrers) make up their minds from crap they hear as they hide behind log in nicks. If you want to say someone is guilty of an act put your name to it so you can be responsible for your comments if you are wrong. Weak as piss. Like I said I agreed with your comment.

So you have Eastern Park saying he didn't do it and Broadview saying he did. Will the people who say he didn't do it be held responsible to their comments if he is found guilty.

Oldslow, if you don't like reading other peoples opinions on what happened then maybe a forum isn't for you.

I have no prob reading other peoples opinions, but when they get on here and drag a blokes name through the mud don't hide. Unless you were on the ground in the area lets face it you don't know what happened. I have no idea what happened because quite simply I wasn't there, so no point having a guess. Yet people on here who were not even at the ground have slagged the bloke off, that is not peoples opinions that is mud raking and weak as piss when you don't put your name to it. There is a big difference between people saying he is guilty and people saying he isn't, one group are not damaging a reputation before the investigation findings.

[Shirtfront]

Read it again I was agreeing with you. My point was people on here (always the same stirrers) make up their minds from crap they hear as they hide behind log in nicks. If you want to say someone is guilty of an act put your name to it so you can be responsible for your comments if you are wrong. Weak as piss. Like I said I agreed with your comment.

So you have Eastern Park saying he didn't do it and Broadview saying he did. Will the people who say he didn't do it be held responsible to their comments if he is found guilty.

Oldslow, if you don't like reading other peoples opinions on what happened then maybe a forum isn't for you.

I have no prob reading other peoples opinions, but when they get on here and drag a blokes name through the mud don't hide. Unless you were on the ground in the area lets face it you don't know what happened. I have no idea what happened because quite simply I wasn't there, so no point having a guess. Yet people on here who were not even at the ground have slagged the bloke off, that is not peoples opinions that is mud raking and weak as piss when you don't put your name to it. There is a big difference between people saying he is guilty and people saying he isn't, one group are not damaging a reputation before the investigation findings.

I say, if there is no case to answer then i will call the bluff of EP, and ask them to have enquire about having the hearing before the medal count and GF. If there is nothing to worry about, it shouldn't be an issue. I will be the first to apologise for my views on the issue if thats the case. I do however, still question the wisdom of the SAAFL on having the hearing so long after the 'incident'. No matter what club or player involved, its just not logical.

[Footy Chick]

It won't matter whether the hearing is before or after - if he's found guilty his medal will be retrospectively removed from him.

[oldslow]

It won't matter whether the hearing is before or after - if he's found guilty his medal will be retrospectively removed from him.

So he has already won it then. ????

[Rotter]

Read it again I was agreeing with you. My point was people on here (always the same stirrers) make up their minds from crap they hear as they hide behind log in nicks. If you want to say someone is guilty of an act put your name to it so you can be responsible for your comments if you are wrong. Weak as piss. Like I said I agreed with your comment.

So you have Eastern Park saying he didn't do it and Broadview saying he did. Will the people who say he didn't do it be held responsible to their comments if he is found guilty.

Oldslow, if you don't like reading other peoples opinions on what happened then maybe a forum isn't for you.

I have no prob reading other peoples opinions, but when they get on here and drag a blokes name through the mud don't hide. Unless you were on the ground in the area lets face it you don't know what happened. I have no idea what happened because quite simply I wasn't there, so no point having a guess. Yet people on here who were not even at the ground have slagged the bloke off, that is not peoples opinions that is mud raking and weak as piss when you don't put your name to it. There is a big difference between people saying he is guilty and people saying he isn't, one group are not damaging a reputation before the investigation findings.

He doth protest too much.