by The_Warrior » Thu Jun 18, 2009 3:02 pm
by nuggety goodness » Thu Jun 18, 2009 3:31 pm
by Q. » Thu Jun 18, 2009 3:47 pm
by Ambo72 » Thu Jun 18, 2009 4:30 pm
by Road to Glory » Thu Jun 18, 2009 4:51 pm
nuggety goodness wrote:winners for the start of the second round...
St Pauls - Athelstone, 36pts. will repay Athelstone for their first round defeat and give themselves some room at the top.
Last time they met Athelstone by 52
Ovingham - Sacred Heart, 29pts. will get back onto the winners list this week after a great effort against St Pauls last week. SHOCS haven't won since Rd 4...
Last time they met SHOCS by 50
Houghton - Flinders Uni, 43pts. not enough crabs will make the journey to trouble the Raiders who will consolidate 4th spot on the table comfortably.
Last time they met Houghton by 99
Adelaide Uni - Henley, 50pts. Sharks will go to town on the uni boys
Last time they met Henley by 91
North Pines - Angle Vale, 17pts. The Vale seem to have dropped off a bit and the Piners are finding form, should be a close one
Last time they met Angle Vale by 82
by nuggety goodness » Thu Jun 18, 2009 4:53 pm
Road to Glory wrote:nuggety goodness wrote:winners for the start of the second round...
St Pauls - Athelstone, 36pts. will repay Athelstone for their first round defeat and give themselves some room at the top.
Last time they met Athelstone by 52
Ovingham - Sacred Heart, 29pts. will get back onto the winners list this week after a great effort against St Pauls last week. SHOCS haven't won since Rd 4...
Last time they met SHOCS by 50
Houghton - Flinders Uni, 43pts. not enough crabs will make the journey to trouble the Raiders who will consolidate 4th spot on the table comfortably.
Last time they met Houghton by 99
Adelaide Uni - Henley, 50pts. Sharks will go to town on the uni boys
Last time they met Henley by 91
North Pines - Angle Vale, 17pts. The Vale seem to have dropped off a bit and the Piners are finding form, should be a close one
Last time they met Angle Vale by 82
if all goes as you predict then houghton will be third on percentage over athelstone who will drop to 4th
by Footy Smart » Fri Jun 19, 2009 10:15 am
by Q. » Fri Jun 19, 2009 10:20 am
Footy Smart wrote:What did the bloke from North Pines B grade do to get 9 games???
by Bigshow82 » Fri Jun 19, 2009 10:23 am
Footy Smart wrote:What did the bloke from North Pines B grade do to get 9 games???
by Footy Smart » Fri Jun 19, 2009 10:26 am
by Bigshow82 » Fri Jun 19, 2009 10:53 am
Footy Smart wrote:Well that while humerous would explain the lucky 9 he got, they could have (probably should) given him more even if the umpire is a knob hahaha imagine what he would do to TTG c grade umpire now he is just a criminal robbing points from teams
by Footy Smart » Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:14 am
Bigshow82 wrote:Footy Smart wrote:Well that while humerous would explain the lucky 9 he got, they could have (probably should) given him more even if the umpire is a knob hahaha imagine what he would do to TTG c grade umpire now he is just a criminal robbing points from teams
I dont think he should have got any more. The umpire was asked did he feel threatened at all or that he was in danger and the ump said NO. The ump said that at no stage did he threaten him or anything just that he lost his cool and made a silly mistake. The league knew that he had already been suspended for 1 game (red card) so if they wanted to stop him from playing again they would have just given him 2 more games. Common sense prevailed on this one IMO
by finn » Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:47 pm
Footy Smart wrote:Well that while humerous would explain the lucky 9 he got, they could have (probably should) given him more even if the umpire is a knob hahaha imagine what he would do to TTG c grade umpire now he is just a criminal robbing points from teams
by Keepitreal » Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:48 pm
finn wrote:Footy Smart wrote:Well that while humerous would explain the lucky 9 he got, they could have (probably should) given him more even if the umpire is a knob hahaha imagine what he would do to TTG c grade umpire now he is just a criminal robbing points from teams
surprised - the ttg umpire we had this year was different (younger and bearded) to the one of the last few years - and was actually quite fair while the other guy was exactly what you said. best thing was that they got so used to being helped that neutral umpires in finals just blew them away.
by White Unicorn » Fri Jun 19, 2009 2:49 pm
Bigshow82 wrote:Footy Smart wrote:Well that while humerous would explain the lucky 9 he got, they could have (probably should) given him more even if the umpire is a knob hahaha imagine what he would do to TTG c grade umpire now he is just a criminal robbing points from teams
I dont think he should have got any more. The umpire was asked did he feel threatened at all or that he was in danger and the ump said NO. The ump said that at no stage did he threaten him or anything just that he lost his cool and made a silly mistake. The league knew that he had already been suspended for 1 game (red card) so if they wanted to stop him from playing again they would have just given him 2 more games. Common sense prevailed on this one IMO
by Bigshow82 » Fri Jun 19, 2009 3:11 pm
White Unicorn wrote:Bigshow82 wrote:Footy Smart wrote:Well that while humerous would explain the lucky 9 he got, they could have (probably should) given him more even if the umpire is a knob hahaha imagine what he would do to TTG c grade umpire now he is just a criminal robbing points from teams
I dont think he should have got any more. The umpire was asked did he feel threatened at all or that he was in danger and the ump said NO. The ump said that at no stage did he threaten him or anything just that he lost his cool and made a silly mistake. The league knew that he had already been suspended for 1 game (red card) so if they wanted to stop him from playing again they would have just given him 2 more games. Common sense prevailed on this one IMO
Hmm or was it the other way around??? The bloke was a peanut, the umpire has been umpiring for 25 years and is a neutral umpire - ie SHOC recruited him to do the D Grade. Sorry but peanuts like that should have the book thrown at them.
by finn » Fri Jun 19, 2009 3:59 pm
Keepitreal wrote:finn wrote:Footy Smart wrote:Well that while humerous would explain the lucky 9 he got, they could have (probably should) given him more even if the umpire is a knob hahaha imagine what he would do to TTG c grade umpire now he is just a criminal robbing points from teams
surprised - the ttg umpire we had this year was different (younger and bearded) to the one of the last few years - and was actually quite fair while the other guy was exactly what you said. best thing was that they got so used to being helped that neutral umpires in finals just blew them away.
Pot calling the kettle black, we all know who is the biggest cheating umpire in the saafl.
by Keepitreal » Fri Jun 19, 2009 4:07 pm
finn wrote:Keepitreal wrote:finn wrote:Footy Smart wrote:Well that while humerous would explain the lucky 9 he got, they could have (probably should) given him more even if the umpire is a knob hahaha imagine what he would do to TTG c grade umpire now he is just a criminal robbing points from teams
surprised - the ttg umpire we had this year was different (younger and bearded) to the one of the last few years - and was actually quite fair while the other guy was exactly what you said. best thing was that they got so used to being helped that neutral umpires in finals just blew them away.
Pot calling the kettle black, we all know who is the biggest cheating umpire in the saafl.
i've never had book (whom i suppose you're referring to) umpire so can only comment on the grade i've been directly involved in - which exposed me to the ttg c grade umpire.
its also not a pissing contest just a direct comment on a specific umpire
by White Unicorn » Fri Jun 19, 2009 4:21 pm
Bigshow82 wrote:White Unicorn wrote:Bigshow82 wrote:Footy Smart wrote:Well that while humerous would explain the lucky 9 he got, they could have (probably should) given him more even if the umpire is a knob hahaha imagine what he would do to TTG c grade umpire now he is just a criminal robbing points from teams
I dont think he should have got any more. The umpire was asked did he feel threatened at all or that he was in danger and the ump said NO. The ump said that at no stage did he threaten him or anything just that he lost his cool and made a silly mistake. The league knew that he had already been suspended for 1 game (red card) so if they wanted to stop him from playing again they would have just given him 2 more games. Common sense prevailed on this one IMO
Hmm or was it the other way around??? The bloke was a peanut, the umpire has been umpiring for 25 years and is a neutral umpire - ie SHOC recruited him to do the D Grade. Sorry but peanuts like that should have the book thrown at them.
Hey champ not to sure of your idea of neutral but the ump was a blatten cheat all day long. The bloke in question is a top bloke and this was way out of character. Before you go around calling people peanuts I would have a good hard look at your own team. Look forward to playing you blokes on the return leg. hahahaha peanut that is sure to give the boys something to laugh about at the club.
by Road to Glory » Sat Jun 20, 2009 10:47 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |