


by Executive Member » Fri Mar 02, 2012 6:12 pm
by Masha » Fri Mar 02, 2012 6:18 pm
SATCHEL wrote:Footy Chick wrote:as will Portland.
Sorry, just saw this. YES very keen as per my previous comment. Please anyone in C2 please PM me if you are keen to have a look at the prospects of Triple Headers
by Demon Juke » Sat Mar 03, 2012 12:19 am
Masha wrote:SATCHEL wrote:Footy Chick wrote:as will Portland.
Sorry, just saw this. YES very keen as per my previous comment. Please anyone in C2 please PM me if you are keen to have a look at the prospects of Triple Headers
Brahma Lodge C grade are also willing to swap games to accomodate the triple headers. So any clubs in C4 who havent been set up for the bye, but are willing to change, please PM me.
by Demon Juke » Sat Mar 03, 2012 12:32 am
Executive Member wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Poor form by the saafl IMO regarding the draw and the gradings!!! Not a whole lot of common sense has been put into this!!! This doesn't benefit my club and im pretty sure it doesn't benefit alot of other clubs...![]()
But I guess this is what the delegates wanted, they voted it in
You sound confused, you blame the league - and can tell you a lot of thought went into it as was based on performance last year
Then you say it won't benefit a lot of clubs but then admit the clubs voted it in![]()
Embrace the change and if clubs not individuals within clubs don't like it they can change it next year
If we didn't continue to try and improve then we would still have delegates meetings at Tynte Street and be playing finals on neutral grounds
Give it a chance
by S Demon » Sat Mar 03, 2012 12:45 am
Jetters wrote:S Demon wrote:It just seems a shame that when we play Fitzroy, Brahma, Kenilworth, Rosewater and Glenunga, they won't be triple headers with the same clubs involved.
I understand that is now gone because of promotion/relegation. I still stand by my opinion that the C grade sides should have been aligned to the A grade sides as best they can for this year and that selecting divisions based on last year's form wasn't the right way to go about it
I thought the clubs voted it in on the basis that all games would be scheduled as triple headers? Maybe I was misinformed
S Demon, Unley will be keen to switch around home and away games in rounds 1 and 10 to give each club triple headers in both rounds.
by Demon Juke » Sat Mar 03, 2012 12:51 am
S Demon wrote:Jetters wrote:S Demon wrote:It just seems a shame that when we play Fitzroy, Brahma, Kenilworth, Rosewater and Glenunga, they won't be triple headers with the same clubs involved.
I understand that is now gone because of promotion/relegation. I still stand by my opinion that the C grade sides should have been aligned to the A grade sides as best they can for this year and that selecting divisions based on last year's form wasn't the right way to go about it
I thought the clubs voted it in on the basis that all games would be scheduled as triple headers? Maybe I was misinformed
S Demon, Unley will be keen to switch around home and away games in rounds 1 and 10 to give each club triple headers in both rounds.
That's good news and I'm sure it will happen. Probably could have been put in the draw by the league with just "a couple of dozen phone calls"...
by Yardy Lard » Sat Mar 03, 2012 12:56 am
SATCHEL wrote:Yardy Lard wrote:Lets just see how the year pans out first. Sure it seems like there could be some changes made to suit everyone, but as also stated, lets just see how this year pans out and then decide over the summer. Certain things are not ideal with it, but getting a draw up that suits all 66 clubs would be absolutely impossible, even in the best of circumstances. Best take a chill pill on this and work with it in 2012 - see the bad and good points and then fix it again at the end of the season. Certainly, the beltings that were happening last year, were not ideal either and probably a big reason for the change to a new system. As said - work out what is bad and then come back and fix it.
WOW YL. You do actually have something intelligent to add on hereJust kidding. After the discussion at our club and about the place. I was advised that we were having triple headers coming out the wazoo. We have ONE (1). Im really disappointed to be honest. Also the change to the sides was not as bad as i thought. Only change being Unley in and Adel Uni out. To be perfectly honest there is so much uncertainty about the new gradings, the way the Div's will work and how the sides will react to the changes on any given Saturday. No comment can really bhe past on the success until the break in the middle. That should give us some indication on how we are travelling in the interim. Until the end of the year not much more can be passed. Until then lets have a crack, have a look at it and then make our judgement. I completley understand some of the frustrations but you never knwo what can happen form here until round 1 and then round 18 and into the finals. I will put it out there and say taht im ratehr annoyed at the triple header scenario for us.
by Masha » Sat Mar 03, 2012 5:44 pm
Demon Juke wrote:Masha wrote:SATCHEL wrote:Footy Chick wrote:as will Portland.
Sorry, just saw this. YES very keen as per my previous comment. Please anyone in C2 please PM me if you are keen to have a look at the prospects of Triple Headers
Brahma Lodge C grade are also willing to swap games to accomodate the triple headers. So any clubs in C4 who havent been set up for the bye, but are willing to change, please PM me.
You have some one higher up, that has time to do that for you.
by SATCHEL » Wed Mar 07, 2012 9:41 am
by SATCHEL » Fri Apr 27, 2012 1:39 pm
by Bluedemon » Wed May 02, 2012 9:56 am
by Masha » Wed May 02, 2012 6:38 pm
by SATCHEL » Fri Jul 06, 2012 9:30 pm
by Yank Man » Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:19 pm
Executive Member wrote:Calls have already been reduced this year, they wont be reducing them again for your benefit for the sake of a couple of dozen phone calls
by TEX07 » Sat Jul 07, 2012 9:53 am
SATCHEL wrote:Well it's been a bit disappointing for us this year. The new div has certainly given a shake up to a lot of sides. Be interesting to see how things turn out with the promotion relegation scenarios. How's everyone else seen the diva as it stands now. We all had our criticisms early and the consensus was to see how it was at the half way point to make a full judgement. For me there are some sides that will enjoy a higher c grade comp than others.
by SATCHEL » Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:50 am
by beef » Thu Sep 06, 2012 12:16 pm
by Bluebeard » Thu Sep 06, 2012 12:22 pm
beef wrote:Div 8 was really good i thought, even if we didnt win enough games. I think Div 8R may need to be looked at, way too many forfeits, i think our D grade only played like once in the last month and a couple of the late rounds only had one game as the other were forfeits. Dont know what can be done to fix it.
by Gatt_Weasel » Thu Sep 06, 2012 12:30 pm
by Executive Member » Thu Sep 06, 2012 2:15 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:see pooraka c grade was listed as c2 probably should be c4
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |