by The Cows » Wed Aug 14, 2013 8:42 am
by Robb_Stark » Wed Aug 14, 2013 10:01 am
wristwatcher wrote:Your right I wasn't there and I have remained very analytical about the whole situation but I don't need to keep my mouth shut at all. Some of my friends and colleagues where at incidents involving Smithfield and I have made all the relevant inquiries regarding their expulsion.
I understand your frustration at missing finals that results suggest you should be entitled to play but I'm not the reason for that and me responding to a post with the reported facts is my prerogative . I have said nothing defamatory about Smithfield and I won't be keeping my mouth shut because I haven't said anything out of order.
by DO IT DO IT » Wed Aug 14, 2013 10:25 am
by Robb_Stark » Wed Aug 14, 2013 10:36 am
DO IT DO IT wrote:Poor old Smithfield. Done nothing wrong on or off the field and still penalised. That is bloody unlucky for the Smithfield Angels.
by Wazz » Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:03 am
Robb_Stark wrote:DO IT DO IT wrote:Poor old Smithfield. Done nothing wrong on or off the field and still penalised. That is bloody unlucky for the Smithfield Angels.
i can name half the north sides who at one time or another in the last 5-10 years have had problems on and off the field its how you fix them problems in the future in all honesty in the north as you get further out it gets rougher no offense
by Phantom Gossiper » Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:11 am
Robb_Stark wrote:I don't know anyone at Smithfield or care for them but what did the league actually do to help the club out in the first place seems they just used big words and didn't actually do anything...then they kick them out cause they put it in the to hard basket.....3 strikes and your out seems a little shit how about actual intervention could have done so many things to help the club
now you got a club who finished 6th who shouldn't be in the finals...does that 6th side deserve to play finals NO.... either play Smithfield or auto win but don't give a worse side a shot
I personally think the league needs to grow a pair and step in on situations rather then use big words and threats
by Phantom Gossiper » Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:13 am
Robb_Stark wrote:i can name half the north sides who at one time or another in the last 5-10 years have had problems on and off the field its how you fix them problems in the future
by secondstring » Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:17 am
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Robb_Stark wrote:I don't know anyone at Smithfield or care for them but what did the league actually do to help the club out in the first place seems they just used big words and didn't actually do anything...then they kick them out cause they put it in the to hard basket.....3 strikes and your out seems a little shit how about actual intervention could have done so many things to help the club
now you got a club who finished 6th who shouldn't be in the finals...does that 6th side deserve to play finals NO.... either play Smithfield or auto win but don't give a worse side a shot
I personally think the league needs to grow a pair and step in on situations rather then use big words and threats
Totally disagree, the league isn't there to be a counsellor/parent and help all the clubs through their own internal issues, they have more concerning issues to address and a lot more clubs and divisions that they need to keep their eyes on.
If you had a very ordinary employee in your workforce would management invest time and resources in providing an intervention as you say? No they would just sack them and get someone new in.
Nothing to do with putting anyone in a too hard basket, obviously the league had reason to believe Smithfields actions were damaging their brand and affecting other stakeholders and felt this was the best course of action and went with it.
by GEESKIP » Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:19 am
Wazz wrote:Robb_Stark wrote:DO IT DO IT wrote:Poor old Smithfield. Done nothing wrong on or off the field and still penalised. That is bloody unlucky for the Smithfield Angels.
i can name half the north sides who at one time or another in the last 5-10 years have had problems on and off the field its how you fix them problems in the future in all honesty in the north as you get further out it gets rougher no offense
Offense taken you knob! Yes there have been some issues but to suggest the "northern" clubs are rougher than other areas smacks of pure snobbery. Have a look at the tribunal this year and the clubs involved not in the north - Lockleys, Goodwood, Broadview, Seaton, Adelaide Uni, Woody South, Plympton, Mitcham, Henley, Pulteney, Gepps Cross, SHOC, SMOSH, Hope Valley, Modbury, Flinders Park, Col Light Gardens, TTG, Blackfriars, Gaza, Port District, West Croydon, Unley Mitcham, North Haven, PAOC, Portland.
by Robb_Stark » Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:22 am
secondstring wrote:Phantom Gossiper wrote:Robb_Stark wrote:I don't know anyone at Smithfield or care for them but what did the league actually do to help the club out in the first place seems they just used big words and didn't actually do anything...then they kick them out cause they put it in the to hard basket.....3 strikes and your out seems a little shit how about actual intervention could have done so many things to help the club
now you got a club who finished 6th who shouldn't be in the finals...does that 6th side deserve to play finals NO.... either play Smithfield or auto win but don't give a worse side a shot
I personally think the league needs to grow a pair and step in on situations rather then use big words and threats
Totally disagree, the league isn't there to be a counsellor/parent and help all the clubs through their own internal issues, they have more concerning issues to address and a lot more clubs and divisions that they need to keep their eyes on.
If you had a very ordinary employee in your workforce would management invest time and resources in providing an intervention as you say? No they would just sack them and get someone new in.
Nothing to do with putting anyone in a too hard basket, obviously the league had reason to believe Smithfields actions were damaging their brand and affecting other stakeholders and felt this was the best course of action and went with it.
If that is the case how did Central United play the year out with there record and media coverage they brought to the league?
by Phantom Gossiper » Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:25 am
by Phantom Gossiper » Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:27 am
secondstring wrote:If that is the case how did Central United play the year out with there record and media coverage they brought to the league?
by Q. » Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:27 am
GEESKIP wrote:Excactly Wazz, plenty of stuck up clubs gone to the tribunal this year but as usual the "Northern" clubs dealt the harsh penalties......on that note wasnt there a complaint lodged against Woody South and Henley (both of which made the news), what ever came off those incidences??
by Footy Chick » Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:34 am
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by thrilling finish » Wed Aug 14, 2013 12:15 pm
wristwatcher wrote:Your right I wasn't there and I have remained very analytical about the whole situation but I don't need to keep my mouth shut at all. Some of my friends and colleagues where at incidents involving Smithfield and I have made all the relevant inquiries regarding their expulsion.
I understand your frustration at missing finals that results suggest you should be entitled to play but I'm not the reason for that and me responding to a post with the reported facts is my prerogative . I have said nothing defamatory about Smithfield and I won't be keeping my mouth shut because I haven't said anything out of order.
wristwatcher wrote:13 reports with 9 guilty and a police investigation we can't comment on. I'd say the league did grow a pair and did what they needed to do.
by morell » Wed Aug 14, 2013 12:57 pm
Wazz wrote:Robb_Stark wrote:DO IT DO IT wrote:Poor old Smithfield. Done nothing wrong on or off the field and still penalised. That is bloody unlucky for the Smithfield Angels.
i can name half the north sides who at one time or another in the last 5-10 years have had problems on and off the field its how you fix them problems in the future in all honesty in the north as you get further out it gets rougher no offense
Offense taken you knob! Yes there have been some issues but to suggest the "northern" clubs are rougher than other areas smacks of pure snobbery. Have a look at the tribunal this year and the clubs involved not in the north - Lockleys, Goodwood, Broadview, Seaton, Adelaide Uni, Woody South, Plympton, Mitcham, Henley, Pulteney, Gepps Cross, SHOC, SMOSH, Hope Valley, Modbury, Flinders Park, Col Light Gardens, TTG, Blackfriars, Gaza, Port District, West Croydon, Unley Mitcham, North Haven, PAOC, Portland.
by Bloods4Life » Wed Aug 14, 2013 1:07 pm
morell wrote:Wazz wrote:Robb_Stark wrote:DO IT DO IT wrote:Poor old Smithfield. Done nothing wrong on or off the field and still penalised. That is bloody unlucky for the Smithfield Angels.
i can name half the north sides who at one time or another in the last 5-10 years have had problems on and off the field its how you fix them problems in the future in all honesty in the north as you get further out it gets rougher no offense
Offense taken you knob! Yes there have been some issues but to suggest the "northern" clubs are rougher than other areas smacks of pure snobbery. Have a look at the tribunal this year and the clubs involved not in the north - Lockleys, Goodwood, Broadview, Seaton, Adelaide Uni, Woody South, Plympton, Mitcham, Henley, Pulteney, Gepps Cross, SHOC, SMOSH, Hope Valley, Modbury, Flinders Park, Col Light Gardens, TTG, Blackfriars, Gaza, Port District, West Croydon, Unley Mitcham, North Haven, PAOC, Portland.
But, but, but... Where are Mitchell Park! Those guys are thugs!
by Cohiba » Wed Aug 14, 2013 1:39 pm
morell wrote:Wazz wrote:Robb_Stark wrote:DO IT DO IT wrote:Poor old Smithfield. Done nothing wrong on or off the field and still penalised. That is bloody unlucky for the Smithfield Angels.
i can name half the north sides who at one time or another in the last 5-10 years have had problems on and off the field its how you fix them problems in the future in all honesty in the north as you get further out it gets rougher no offense
Offense taken you knob! Yes there have been some issues but to suggest the "northern" clubs are rougher than other areas smacks of pure snobbery. Have a look at the tribunal this year and the clubs involved not in the north - Lockleys, Goodwood, Broadview, Seaton, Adelaide Uni, Woody South, Plympton, Mitcham, Henley, Pulteney, Gepps Cross, SHOC, SMOSH, Hope Valley, Modbury, Flinders Park, Col Light Gardens, TTG, Blackfriars, Gaza, Port District, West Croydon, Unley Mitcham, North Haven, PAOC, Portland.
But, but, but... Where are Mitchell Park! Those guys are thugs!
by happilyretired » Wed Aug 14, 2013 1:45 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:Enough about Smithfield anyway, let's focus on the important stuff at hand - this weeks crucial finals games! Peoples thoughts on the match ups??
Div 7
Angle Vale v Houghton - Houghton appear to have gone off the boil in recent weeks, although injuries may well have hindered their form. I think Angle Vale at home, big day for the club with the A & B grade playing will be up and about for this clash, and will be brimming with confidence given their last encounter a couple weeks ago. Houghton on the other hand have had a tough finish to the season having to travel halfway around the state and play against teams who have had more to play for and i think that will take it's toll.
Flinders Park v Flinders Uni - Well done and congrats to Uni on the finals berth, massive step forward for the club and vast improvement on previous seasons, however the step up to finals I think will be too great, and being the 6th best side this year will show. This game will be a bit of a non-event and at home I think Flinders Park will win comfortably.
Div 7R
Ingle Farm v Flinders Park - "Home" game for Farmers at Flinders Park will prove a challenge, especially if the rain continues during the week as forecast. This will be an absolute rip snorter - clubs shared the spoils during the minor round, i'll be biased and get on the Farmers for a win just feel as a team and a club they have too much to prove and play for, and look to just be clicking at the right time.
Angle Vale v Flinders Uni - Sorry crabs, but as with the A grade just don't think they will handle the step up to finals well enough, culminated with one of the longest road trips in the comp and Angle Vale at home in front of their home crowd, think this will be over by half time.
by Phantom Gossiper » Wed Aug 14, 2013 1:52 pm
happilyretired wrote:Probably agree with 3 of the predicted results, except i think the Flinders Uni Reserves side will roll Angle Vale out there.. From what i have seen they have a pretty strong side with some really physical onballers which compliment their handy outside runners and i'm going for an upset even with the massive road trip!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |