NO-MERCY wrote:prb wrote:Must have posted on wrong page-sorry guys, still learning the ropes.
My comment which is somewhere was that there is no egg on Pres' face over Walsh issue-he was only stating what Walsh told several people that he was returning to SRFC.
Possibly only egg on Pres' face is that at beginning of 2007 he stood his ground over wanting Hodges to coach club for next 3-5 years, against majority of committee. With assisstance from Big Al got his way, only for Hodges to jump ship after 1 year
Well "prb", can't see how he'd have egg on his face over his statement that he'd like Hodges to coach the club for the next 4-5 yrs. most know the health issues involved & that was the reason for him needing the time away, with full support from the club.
As for the majority of the committee that you say were not supportive of his statement i think is a crock of sh!t & you know that.
All committee ive spoken to at the club were all in support of Hodges & the direction he had the club heading.
I think the only ones that wern't in favour were the likes of you & certain people who were backstabbing him at every opportunity cause they couldn't get their own way.
Think before you post "prb", talk about egg on the face!!

A well known player at seaton told me about a verbal altication between the prez & scotty one night.
The prez apparently sat on the fence regarding a tough decision the coach had to make, made purely on team rules enforced by the coach.
The player got dropped from the As as he didn't train, or worse didn't phone the coach, yet expected to play.
He was shattered & spoke to the prez with his parents which led to an altercation with the coach in the club after the game.
Scotty stood his ground, the prez & parents didn't like it, as to the player, so the prez gave the player his A grade match payments for playing B grade.
Talk about undermining the coaches team rules.
Do you know anything about that "prb"???
