

Thats grose!
by piccachu » Mon Nov 10, 2008 11:23 am
by The Big Shrek » Mon Nov 10, 2008 11:29 am
Iron Fist wrote:piccachu wrote:yes a few hundred
PAOC chagerooms are 100m away from the oval
plus warming up on the far end of the oval
if a oval is 180m add the 100 to the change room
gives you 380m to take a pee, thats in the portland case anyway
would take at least 4 mins to get there and back, thats a fair chunk of warm up if the coach ahs been chatting for a while
and in the case of quarter or three quarter time, basicly the whole time!!
and on the pee on the oval thing
bet you a dog has pissed and s***t on the oval aswell so its the same really!!
in fistys case it would take him about 15 20 mins
i just wear skins and piss my pants
acts as a warming device on a cold day aswell
i would advise all people with hammy problems do it, helps keep them warm!!![]()
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Nov 10, 2008 11:38 am
by Iron Fist » Mon Nov 10, 2008 11:39 am
The Big Shrek wrote:Iron Fist wrote:piccachu wrote:yes a few hundred
PAOC chagerooms are 100m away from the oval
plus warming up on the far end of the oval
if a oval is 180m add the 100 to the change room
gives you 380m to take a pee, thats in the portland case anyway
would take at least 4 mins to get there and back, thats a fair chunk of warm up if the coach ahs been chatting for a while
and in the case of quarter or three quarter time, basicly the whole time!!
and on the pee on the oval thing
bet you a dog has pissed and s***t on the oval aswell so its the same really!!
in fistys case it would take him about 15 20 mins
i just wear skins and piss my pants
acts as a warming device on a cold day aswell
i would advise all people with hammy problems do it, helps keep them warm!!![]()
What effect does this have on chaffing Fisty?
by Iron Fist » Mon Nov 10, 2008 11:40 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:If I'm going on a long journey, I tell my kids to have a wee before we leave, surprisingly, they don't need to go for a while after that.
I have no objections to people going behind a tree or something like that, but pissing on the oval is unhygenic and how would you feel getting tackled where someone had taken a leak?
by Footy Chick » Mon Nov 10, 2008 11:41 am
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Nov 10, 2008 11:51 am
Footy Chick wrote:I love how a thread on life bans has somehow turned into a "where do you pee" thread
by amber_fluid » Mon Nov 10, 2008 11:54 am
Footy Chick wrote:I love how a thread on life bans has somehow turned into a "where do you pee" thread
by Bluedemon » Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:55 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Footy Chick wrote:I love how a thread on life bans has somehow turned into a "where do you pee" thread
we could turn it into a Div 4 thread if you like FC?
by zedman » Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:55 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Footy Chick wrote:I love how a thread on life bans has somehow turned into a "where do you pee" thread
Are you jealous that you can't ethically join in.
by Footy Chick » Mon Nov 10, 2008 12:57 pm
kookas wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Footy Chick wrote:I love how a thread on life bans has somehow turned into a "where do you pee" thread
we could turn it into a Div 4 thread if you like FC?
we are taking the piss out of everything.
by Bluedemon » Mon Nov 10, 2008 3:50 pm
Footy Chick wrote:kookas wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Footy Chick wrote:I love how a thread on life bans has somehow turned into a "where do you pee" thread
we could turn it into a Div 4 thread if you like FC?
we are taking the piss out of everything.
Watch out for flying shoes Kookas
by turk186 » Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:16 pm
by Gator-Aid » Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:22 pm
turk186 wrote:The part of this rule I dislike is the retrospective aspect..how did they pick how far back to go??..darts at a board??
Its like changeing the drink driving rule today from .05 to .03 and saying that any time in the last 2 years you were tested and found to be over .03 but less than .05 you were now guilty of drunk driving and automatically loose your license and get a heafty fine....just does not seem fair IMO
by stan » Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:40 pm
scottroo wrote:was the report made by everyones favourite umpire? that bloke is a discrace, blatant cheat, rude to players etc
by Bigshow82 » Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:44 pm
turk186 wrote:The part of this rule I dislike is the retrospective aspect..how did they pick how far back to go??..darts at a board??
Its like changeing the drink driving rule today from .05 to .03 and saying that any time in the last 2 years you were tested and found to be over .03 but less than .05 you were now guilty of drunk driving and automatically loose your license and get a heafty fine....just does not seem fair IMO
by turk186 » Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:45 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:09 pm
by Footy Chick » Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:54 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:I was at that GF too and I am neutral (as you can see from my club) - I only went to see Macca play
It was pretty bad - a bit like North v Westies GF - a lot of sniping and king hits
But, then again, I am only a soft college poofta
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |