Felch wrote:Obvious lack of mirrors in your place Slots...
Correct no mirrors at all.... when you wake up and look as perfect as i do, you dont need them....
by Slots It Through » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:05 am
Felch wrote:Obvious lack of mirrors in your place Slots...
by Choccies » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:44 am
Felch wrote:The D4 thread will be red-hot next year, with the GG and Haven lads at each other.
You will have to act as mediator Pag !!!
by Felch » Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:59 am
by Pag » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:06 pm
by Slots It Through » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:11 pm
Felch wrote:It will be interesting to see how GG go next year. Of the 2 sides coming down from D3, i would expect Salisbury to be very strong next year. Not sure on Salisbury West, depends on their internal problems. If Mitcham or PAOC dont progress, they will be strong next year too. Fitzroy would be very hopeful of a big 2009, and im sure they will if they can keep their current side together and injury free. Haven would be in a similiar situation with their young group. Pooraka may drop off if they cannot improve their depth.
IMO, GG could go ok next year. They seem to have a alot of depth, probably more than half the sides in D4 this year.
by Iron Fist » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:15 pm
Slots It Through wrote:Felch wrote:It will be interesting to see how GG go next year. Of the 2 sides coming down from D3, i would expect Salisbury to be very strong next year. Not sure on Salisbury West, depends on their internal problems. If Mitcham or PAOC dont progress, they will be strong next year too. Fitzroy would be very hopeful of a big 2009, and im sure they will if they can keep their current side together and injury free. Haven would be in a similiar situation with their young group. Pooraka may drop off if they cannot improve their depth.
IMO, GG could go ok next year. They seem to have a alot of depth, probably more than half the sides in D4 this year.
North Haven will struggle next year. I hear the Hoods down there are leaving, and there maybe a couple more going as well.
by Pag » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:16 pm
Would they ever head back to North Pines? McIntee and Matt Hood are best mates, would probably stick together.Iron Fist wrote:Slots It Through wrote:Felch wrote:It will be interesting to see how GG go next year. Of the 2 sides coming down from D3, i would expect Salisbury to be very strong next year. Not sure on Salisbury West, depends on their internal problems. If Mitcham or PAOC dont progress, they will be strong next year too. Fitzroy would be very hopeful of a big 2009, and im sure they will if they can keep their current side together and injury free. Haven would be in a similiar situation with their young group. Pooraka may drop off if they cannot improve their depth.
IMO, GG could go ok next year. They seem to have a alot of depth, probably more than half the sides in D4 this year.
North Haven will struggle next year. I hear the Hoods down there are leaving, and there maybe a couple more going as well.
Where the hoods going slots???
by Iron Fist » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:17 pm
Pag wrote:I remember in '01 we won D6. We went straight through D5 in '02 and D4 in '03, '04 we were in D3. Could see Golden Grove doing the same thing. I don't think the gaps between D4/D5 and D5/D6 are anywhere near as big as the ones between D3/D4 or D2/D3.
by Iron Fist » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:18 pm
Pag wrote:Would they ever head back to North Pines? McIntee and Matt Hood are best mates, would probably stick together.Iron Fist wrote:Slots It Through wrote:Felch wrote:It will be interesting to see how GG go next year. Of the 2 sides coming down from D3, i would expect Salisbury to be very strong next year. Not sure on Salisbury West, depends on their internal problems. If Mitcham or PAOC dont progress, they will be strong next year too. Fitzroy would be very hopeful of a big 2009, and im sure they will if they can keep their current side together and injury free. Haven would be in a similiar situation with their young group. Pooraka may drop off if they cannot improve their depth.
IMO, GG could go ok next year. They seem to have a alot of depth, probably more than half the sides in D4 this year.
North Haven will struggle next year. I hear the Hoods down there are leaving, and there maybe a couple more going as well.
Where the hoods going slots???
by amber_fluid » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:19 pm
Slots It Through wrote:Felch wrote:It will be interesting to see how GG go next year. Of the 2 sides coming down from D3, i would expect Salisbury to be very strong next year. Not sure on Salisbury West, depends on their internal problems. If Mitcham or PAOC dont progress, they will be strong next year too. Fitzroy would be very hopeful of a big 2009, and im sure they will if they can keep their current side together and injury free. Haven would be in a similiar situation with their young group. Pooraka may drop off if they cannot improve their depth.
IMO, GG could go ok next year. They seem to have a alot of depth, probably more than half the sides in D4 this year.
North Haven will struggle next year. I hear the Hoods down there are leaving, and there maybe a couple more going as well.
by amber_fluid » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:20 pm
by Slots It Through » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:22 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Slots It Through wrote:Felch wrote:It will be interesting to see how GG go next year. Of the 2 sides coming down from D3, i would expect Salisbury to be very strong next year. Not sure on Salisbury West, depends on their internal problems. If Mitcham or PAOC dont progress, they will be strong next year too. Fitzroy would be very hopeful of a big 2009, and im sure they will if they can keep their current side together and injury free. Haven would be in a similiar situation with their young group. Pooraka may drop off if they cannot improve their depth.
IMO, GG could go ok next year. They seem to have a alot of depth, probably more than half the sides in D4 this year.
North Haven will struggle next year. I hear the Hoods down there are leaving, and there maybe a couple more going as well.
Don't believe everything you hear.................And Haven will be around the money again. Would need to lose alot of players to drop that much.
by Pag » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:23 pm
Thanks mate.Iron Fist wrote:Pag wrote:I remember in '01 we won D6. We went straight through D5 in '02 and D4 in '03, '04 we were in D3. Could see Golden Grove doing the same thing. I don't think the gaps between D4/D5 and D5/D6 are anywhere near as big as the ones between D3/D4 or D2/D3.
thats what i have heard aswell pag
the step up from 5 to 4 isnt that huge but from 4 to 3 or 3 to 2 it is a rather large one
salisbury are a good example, were excellent in div 4 in 07 came straight back down this year!!!
its good to see u really coming back into the div4 forum pag
by amber_fluid » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:24 pm
Slots It Through wrote:amber_fluid wrote:Slots It Through wrote:Felch wrote:It will be interesting to see how GG go next year. Of the 2 sides coming down from D3, i would expect Salisbury to be very strong next year. Not sure on Salisbury West, depends on their internal problems. If Mitcham or PAOC dont progress, they will be strong next year too. Fitzroy would be very hopeful of a big 2009, and im sure they will if they can keep their current side together and injury free. Haven would be in a similiar situation with their young group. Pooraka may drop off if they cannot improve their depth.
IMO, GG could go ok next year. They seem to have a alot of depth, probably more than half the sides in D4 this year.
North Haven will struggle next year. I hear the Hoods down there are leaving, and there maybe a couple more going as well.
Don't believe everything you hear.................And Haven will be around the money again. Would need to lose alot of players to drop that much.
Were Haven around the money this year? They finished 5th which makes them average in my mind?
by Felch » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:25 pm
Pag wrote:I remember in '01 we won D6. We went straight through D5 in '02 and D4 in '03, '04 we were in D3. Could see Golden Grove doing the same thing. I don't think the gaps between D4/D5 and D5/D6 are anywhere near as big as the ones between D3/D4 or D2/D3.
by Felch » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:28 pm
Pag wrote:Thanks mate.Iron Fist wrote:Pag wrote:I remember in '01 we won D6. We went straight through D5 in '02 and D4 in '03, '04 we were in D3. Could see Golden Grove doing the same thing. I don't think the gaps between D4/D5 and D5/D6 are anywhere near as big as the ones between D3/D4 or D2/D3.
thats what i have heard aswell pag
the step up from 5 to 4 isnt that huge but from 4 to 3 or 3 to 2 it is a rather large one
salisbury are a good example, were excellent in div 4 in 07 came straight back down this year!!!
its good to see u really coming back into the div4 forum pag
We went in this year with about 2 new guys from the 07 team, lost 2 to retirement. So 20 of the same 22. Para Hills got themselves a couple of good key forwards (Hanson & Flynn), another midfielder (Page), and they stayed up comfortably. And look where we ended up...
by Pag » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:29 pm
Pretty much mate, talls if you can get them. Teams like Walkerville are just stacked with talls, on dry days it can be hard to compete.Felch wrote:Pag wrote:Thanks mate.Iron Fist wrote:Pag wrote:I remember in '01 we won D6. We went straight through D5 in '02 and D4 in '03, '04 we were in D3. Could see Golden Grove doing the same thing. I don't think the gaps between D4/D5 and D5/D6 are anywhere near as big as the ones between D3/D4 or D2/D3.
thats what i have heard aswell pag
the step up from 5 to 4 isnt that huge but from 4 to 3 or 3 to 2 it is a rather large one
salisbury are a good example, were excellent in div 4 in 07 came straight back down this year!!!
its good to see u really coming back into the div4 forum pag
We went in this year with about 2 new guys from the 07 team, lost 2 to retirement. So 20 of the same 22. Para Hills got themselves a couple of good key forwards (Hanson & Flynn), another midfielder (Page), and they stayed up comfortably. And look where we ended up...
You blokes were competitive at times though. A couple of quality recruits is whats needed.
by Slots It Through » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:32 pm
by amber_fluid » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:36 pm
Slots It Through wrote:[Were Haven around the money this year? They finished 5th which makes them average in my mind?
by Iron Fist » Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:41 pm
amber_fluid wrote:Slots It Through wrote:[Were Haven around the money this year? They finished 5th which makes them average in my mind?
They were 2nd for most of the year............lost in an elimination final...........hardly struggletown though!!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |