SA Footy

I think people are probably jumping the gun because they've reduced to 2 teams. This obviously isn't going to help with depth once injuries set in.

Footy Chick wrote:I think people are probably jumping the gun because they've reduced to 2 teams. This obviously isn't going to help with depth once injuries set in.

Won a magoos flag with only 2 sides . It's a myth!

It's only Para Hills at this point, AFAIK.

Robb_Stark wrote:i will post for paul dittmar the pooraka football director as he does read the forums but does not have an account

it is not Pooraka they are fine and have not asked anything

next nearest club is salisbury then north haven then eastern park

Ditts, Yopey, Nubbo, Kirkwood and co have been amazing in their efforts over the past 10 years or so trying to resurrect the club.
Mind you it hasn't been a failure by any stretch.
Great ground to play footy on.

Q. wrote:It's only Para Hills at this point, AFAIK.

Actually, it appears that there is another club - but it's NOT Pooraka.

The club isn't in D4 but should they fall over, it will create a domino effect which may effect this div.

PS: It's not Kilburn

There. Now you have a whole new set of conclusions to jump to

Footy Chick wrote:

Q. wrote:It's only Para Hills at this point, AFAIK.

Actually, it appears that there is another club - but it's NOT Pooraka.

The club isn't in D4 but should they fall over, it will create a domino effect which may effect this div.

PS: It's not Kilburn

There. Now you have a whole new set of conclusions to jump to

I'm bored. Compass?

jo172 wrote:

Footy Chick wrote:

Q. wrote:It's only Para Hills at this point, AFAIK.

Actually, it appears that there is another club - but it's NOT Pooraka.

The club isn't in D4 but should they fall over, it will create a domino effect which may effect this div.

PS: It's not Kilburn

There. Now you have a whole new set of conclusions to jump to

I'm bored. Compass?

a club in div 2 or 3?

I'm going to re-word this - COULD be another club, not IS...

Could it be Seaton?

LaughingKookaburra wrote:Could it be Seaton?

I was thinking the same.

Why is it then, that Div 4 is the only division that has the fixture taken down.

Because the other isn't a definite, that's why.

Footy Chick wrote:Because the other isn't a definite, that's why.

So Para Hills Definite then?? Then all the Grades below should come down as they will all change, or we going to have 9 team comp(easy way out for the league) like they did with div 3 a couple of years ago. Funny thing everybody new 2 months ago that Para Hills where in Trouble with players leaving, maybe clearance's should open in November so the league would start to see some of the action earlier then a month out from the start of the season.

Demon Juke wrote:Why is it then, that Div 4 is the only division that has the fixture taken down.

Your lucky you had a draw , we are still waiting for a draw in div7 4 weeks before seasons starts l makes it very hard to organise any functions

Footy Chick wrote:

Q. wrote:It's only Para Hills at this point, AFAIK.

Actually, it appears that there is another club - but it's NOT Pooraka.

The club isn't in D4 but should they fall over, it will create a domino effect which may effect this div.

PS: It's not Kilburn

There. Now you have a whole new set of conclusions to jump to

So instead of creating this league wide anxiety over clubs falling over everywhere, how about you just say who you've heard. Either way its quite petty imo. Fueling rumours and innuendo which would be pretty rough for club volunteers hearing that everyone thinks their club is about to fall over...

woofwoof wrote:

Demon Juke wrote:Why is it then, that Div 4 is the only division that has the fixture taken down.

Your lucky you had a draw , we are still waiting for a draw in div7 4 weeks before seasons starts l makes it very hard to organise any functions

Standard D7... Happy to not have to deal with that this year

adr107 wrote:

Footy Chick wrote:

Q. wrote:It's only Para Hills at this point, AFAIK.

Actually, it appears that there is another club - but it's NOT Pooraka.

The club isn't in D4 but should they fall over, it will create a domino effect which may effect this div.

PS: It's not Kilburn

There. Now you have a whole new set of conclusions to jump to

So instead of creating this league wide anxiety over clubs falling over everywhere, how about you just say who you've heard. Either way its quite petty imo. Fueling rumours and innuendo which would be pretty rough for club volunteers hearing that everyone thinks their club is about to fall over...

Yeah because Im known for constantly posting false information

I know I'm not the most logical person in the world at times, however noone seemed to take issue with (incorrectly) throwing Pooraka under the bus as the second club, yet after putting out that fire yet saying there could still be another club is petty because I don't want to falsely put another club in that position?

I think if there is in fact a club is in trouble, anyone involved in that club is going to know about it. Let's hope it doesn't happen. For the sake of the whole league.

but each to their own.

Div 4 draw seems to be back online with Para Hills in it, so are they defenitly in or out?

Footy Chick wrote:

adr107 wrote:

Footy Chick wrote:

Q. wrote:It's only Para Hills at this point, AFAIK.

Actually, it appears that there is another club - but it's NOT Pooraka.

The club isn't in D4 but should they fall over, it will create a domino effect which may effect this div.

PS: It's not Kilburn

There. Now you have a whole new set of conclusions to jump to

So instead of creating this league wide anxiety over clubs falling over everywhere, how about you just say who you've heard. Either way its quite petty imo. Fueling rumours and innuendo which would be pretty rough for club volunteers hearing that everyone thinks their club is about to fall over...

Yeah because Im known for constantly posting false information

I know I'm not the most logical person in the world at times, however noone seemed to take issue with (incorrectly) throwing Pooraka under the bus as the second club, yet after putting out that fire yet saying there could still be another club is petty because I don't want to falsely put another club in that position?

I think if there is in fact a club is in trouble, anyone involved in that club is going to know about it. Let's hope it doesn't happen. For the sake of the whole league.

but each to their own.

If you've got facts or think you know something, you should say it. If you're looking for attention, you probably shouldn't bother imo. Take that as a general statement, not a personal one.

Nothing worse as a club volunteer than having people coming and asking if a ridiculous, unsubstantiated rumour has any substance because they read or heard it somewhere. Unfortunately amateur football is full of this.

Its not ridiculous, nor is it unsubstantiated. Im not going to potentially put myself or the site in potential legal trouble by naming and causing potential embarrassment the club involved, especially if they manage to get up for the season.

Ive been a football volunteer for longer than i care to remember and unless it directly affects our club not many people would care to be honest.

I edit - not to be mistaken for the many fine Houghton posters we have on this site