SA Footy

Pembroke 19.5 30.12 49.28 67.34 (436)
Kilburn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 (1)

Tommy "Tucker" Evans a lazy 23 goals

Kilburn, 4 inside 50's for the day the 1st one was Pembroke kicking backwards in the 1st quarter.


Never ever thought I would see 67 goals kicked in an SAAFL match but I have now and probably never again!!!

FOURTH ESTATE wrote:Pembroke 19.5 30.12 49.28 67.34 (436)
Kilburn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 (1)

Tommy "Tucker" Evans a lazy 23 goals

Kilburn, 4 inside 50's for the day the 1st one was Pembroke kicking backwards in the 1st quarter.


Never ever thought I would see 67 goals kicked in an SAAFL match but I have now and probably never again!!!

That's going to really hurt Kilburns %

Amateur League have to now step in, this is a lose lose situation for everyone concerned, the sides playing Kilburn are getting nothing apart from % out of games. I hate to see sides with so much history go under but this has to be addressed.

As for the comments re a Aldinga Sharks/Kilburn game prior to an AFL game, totally disagree with it, put some Div 1 sides on show so the public can see that there is decent footy being played out there

wristwatcher wrote:

FOURTH ESTATE wrote:Pembroke 19.5 30.12 49.28 67.34 (436)
Kilburn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 (1)

Tommy "Tucker" Evans a lazy 23 goals

Kilburn, 4 inside 50's for the day the 1st one was Pembroke kicking backwards in the 1st quarter.


Never ever thought I would see 67 goals kicked in an SAAFL match but I have now and probably never again!!!

That's going to really hurt Kilburns %

It sits at 1.75%

FOURTH ESTATE wrote:Pembroke 19.5 30.12 49.28 67.34 (436)
Kilburn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 (1)

Tommy "Tucker" Evans a lazy 23 goals

Kilburn, 4 inside 50's for the day the 1st one was Pembroke kicking backwards in the 1st quarter.


Never ever thought I would see 67 goals kicked in an SAAFL match but I have now and probably never again!!!

I hope Pembroke didn't give up the point in the perception they wouldn't get any percentage for the win!

Where are the 18 people that voted for a Kilburn premiership win?

gadj1976 wrote:

FOURTH ESTATE wrote:Pembroke 19.5 30.12 49.28 67.34 (436)
Kilburn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 (1)

Tommy "Tucker" Evans a lazy 23 goals

Kilburn, 4 inside 50's for the day the 1st one was Pembroke kicking backwards in the 1st quarter.


Never ever thought I would see 67 goals kicked in an SAAFL match but I have now and probably never again!!!

I hope Pembroke didn't give up the point in the perception they wouldn't get any percentage for the win!

If it was a genuine shot on goal then its the first time Kilburn have missed all season......

FOURTH ESTATE wrote:Pembroke 19.5 30.12 49.28 67.34 (436)
Kilburn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 (1)

Tommy "Tucker" Evans a lazy 23 goals

Kilburn, 4 inside 50's for the day the 1st one was Pembroke kicking backwards in the 1st quarter.


Never ever thought I would see 67 goals kicked in an SAAFL match but I have now and probably never again!!!

Poor second quarter by Pembroke, could of kicked 70 lol.
Im presuming the quarters are 25min?
Amazing to have 101 shots on goal in 100 minutes of football.
Cant be good for anyone

Jim05 wrote:

FOURTH ESTATE wrote:Pembroke 19.5 30.12 49.28 67.34 (436)
Kilburn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 (1)

Tommy "Tucker" Evans a lazy 23 goals

Kilburn, 4 inside 50's for the day the 1st one was Pembroke kicking backwards in the 1st quarter.


Never ever thought I would see 67 goals kicked in an SAAFL match but I have now and probably never again!!!

Poor second quarter by Pembroke, could of kicked 70 lol.
Im presuming the quarters are 25min?
Amazing to have 101 shots on goal in 100 minutes of football.
Cant be good for anyone

Think its 20 plus time on.

Forget putting them in the C grade divisions.

I think Friday Night Grasshoppers.

Never ever thought I would see 67 goals kicked in an SAAFL match but I have now and probably never again!!![/quote]
Poor second quarter by Pembroke, could of kicked 70 lol.
Im presuming the quarters are 25min?
Amazing to have 101 shots on goal in 100 minutes of football.
Cant be good for anyone[/quote]

Think its 20 plus time on.[/quote]


what time the game end?

I always look @ the glass as half full.

@ least we're not going to see a fellow poster on this site's Dad get blow'n, rimmed and get his balls cupped by 3 fully grown men who also post on this site.

There is a positive to everything.....

LaughingKookaburra wrote:I always look @ the glass as half full.

@ least we're not going to see a fellow poster on this site's Dad get blow'n, rimmed and get his balls cupped by 3 fully grown men who also post on this site.

There is a positive to everything.....

Lol

carey wrote:

LaughingKookaburra wrote:I always look @ the glass as half full.

@ least we're not going to see a fellow poster on this site's Dad get blow'n, rimmed and get his balls cupped by 3 fully grown men who also post on this site.

There is a positive to everything.....

Lol

You gotta feel for the Dad a bit

Whilst I hate to see any club go under, the idea of rewarding poor management of any club with a red letter day at the Adelaide Oval is counterintuitive. If we want to promote amateur league "grass roots footy" as a legitimate part of the Aussie Rules landscape then the showcasing should be of the teams/clubs who are doing it right, ie building a club, a culture and a philosophy, not just squandering cash chasing premiership cups.
I agree with the notion of under 18's as curtain raisers or similar, but really, The Aldinga Sharks vs Kilburn? It just makes a mockery. It's a bit like the freakshow concept, it might make people want to have a look but does it do anything to reduce stigma? - nope. It's just sending a message that the SAAFL is just for the old, or incompetent. Not a message I would've thought we'd want to send.

Given Kilburn only have the one side, i'm surprised they haven't looked into playing Friday night or Sat evening matches? Would any of the clubs be interested in that? Surely they could get a few more people down to the club to watch, opposition interested in seeing their opposition play for instance.

Chance to promote the club to the community, make a spectacle of it (sort of lol).

Gives players an extra day off and a chance to enjoy their weekend with family or go and watch another side play.

im picking Old Ignatians to win and to hit the 70 goal mark this week

also on the vote does anyone know what the options put forward to vote on will be ????

Robb_Stark wrote:im picking Old Ignatians to win and to hit the 70 goal mark this week

also on the vote does anyone know what the options put forward to vote on will be ????

I don't think there is a vote as yet mate I believe tonight is a 'discussion' to explore options I believe for a vote they need to give 'sufficient' notice to clubs to properly think through there options.

carey wrote:

Robb_Stark wrote:im picking Old Ignatians to win and to hit the 70 goal mark this week

also on the vote does anyone know what the options put forward to vote on will be ????

I don't think there is a vote as yet mate I believe tonight is a 'discussion' to explore options I believe for a vote they need to give 'sufficient' notice to clubs to properly think through there options.

I think if someone puts forward a motion then it can be voted on straight away. In some instances, depending on the importance, it can be delayed to allow delegates to get club's stance on it. My understanding of the rules is that the SAAFL can withdraw the club because their reserves have forfeited 3 games. I would like to think they wouldn't pull them out altogether but maybe offer them a regrade.

Mr Beefy wrote:I think if someone puts forward a motion then it can be voted on straight away. In some instances, depending on the importance, it can be delayed to allow delegates to get club's stance on it. My understanding of the rules is that the SAAFL can withdraw the club because their reserves have forfeited 3 games. I would like to think they wouldn't pull them out altogether but maybe offer them a regrade.

What if Kilburn decline? Does the SAAFL have the power to just do it, or would it require a majority vote from the clubs?