SA Footy

Any feedback on Eastern Park and Salisbury ?

panthers wrote:Any feedback on Eastern Park and Salisbury ?

They won and we lost.

Pag wrote:

panthers wrote:Any feedback on Eastern Park and Salisbury ?

They won and we lost.

Love the detailed summary....lol

Pag wrote:

panthers wrote:Any feedback on Eastern Park and Salisbury ?

They won and we lost.

Star forward Josh Mann tells me he may miss this week with sore shoulders

beef wrote:

Pag wrote:

panthers wrote:Any feedback on Eastern Park and Salisbury ?

They won and we lost.

Star forward Josh Mann tells me he may miss this week with sore shoulders

Sore knees I would've thought, drops them enough.

Nice little % boster for the Dees on the weekend

watchdog wrote:Nice little % boster for the Dees on the weekend

Why Smithfield get their score wiped?

Mr Beefy wrote:

watchdog wrote:Nice little % boster for the Dees on the weekend

Why Smithfield get their score wiped?

Lockleys snitched...

Refer to whufc post on previous page, that'll give a bit more of an idea.

The Bedge wrote:

Mr Beefy wrote:

watchdog wrote:Nice little % boster for the Dees on the weekend

Why Smithfield get their score wiped?

Lockleys snitched...

Refer to whufc post on previous page, that'll give a bit more of an idea.

.

Hope my footy tips total gets adjusted to reflect this. That's the most important thing in this situation.

beef wrote:Hope my footy tips total gets adjusted to reflect this. That's the most important thing in this situation.

No.

Exceeding player points is my guess. Team sheet shows Smithfield had no points on the park which is presumably incorrect. But you wouldn't lose points for that if you were still under. Just a memo from the league or fine at worse to ensure correct player points are entered. So one suspects they exceeded the 15 points with the players they put on the park. The league sent the below message to clubs on 27 March so not much comeback for any club.

- Please don’t wait until the Thursday before the first match to audit or edit your APPS values
- There’ll be 67 A grade teams all doing the same thing. As at the time of pressing send, Tony tells me only 9 clubs have updated their APPS Values from 2018. The problem with that is come Thursday Night on the 4th of April, once your entered players tally 15 points, no more APPS rated players can be added to the team sheet.
- Player’s values do not auto reduce from one year to the next
- Send Tony a list of all players you’d like assessed
- If you’re happy self-assessing, that’s fine too but since 2011, 5 AdFL Clubs have lost premiership points if applicable for a breach of the APPS.
- We’ve said it before and we’ll say it again. It’s far better for you if Tony makes a blue with an APPS value than you accepting that responsibility yourself.

Down the Hill wrote:Exceeding player points is my guess. Team sheet shows Smithfield had no points on the park which is presumably incorrect. But you wouldn't lose points for that if you were still under. Just a memo from the league or fine at worse to ensure correct player points are entered. So one suspects they exceeded the 15 points with the players they put on the park. The league sent the below message to clubs on 27 March so not much comeback for any club.

- Please don’t wait until the Thursday before the first match to audit or edit your APPS values
- There’ll be 67 A grade teams all doing the same thing. As at the time of pressing send, Tony tells me only 9 clubs have updated their APPS Values from 2018. The problem with that is come Thursday Night on the 4th of April, once your entered players tally 15 points, no more APPS rated players can be added to the team sheet.
- Player’s values do not auto reduce from one year to the next
- Send Tony a list of all players you’d like assessed
- If you’re happy self-assessing, that’s fine too but since 2011, 5 AdFL Clubs have lost premiership points if applicable for a breach of the APPS.
- We’ve said it before and we’ll say it again. It’s far better for you if Tony makes a blue with an APPS value than you accepting that responsibility yourself.

There's a little more to it than that at a guess, I don't think this one is done and dusted yet.

Can't wait until Rd 10

Honestly though, must say i'm filthy - Lockleys had the toughest start to the year, this has given them a bit of a leg up as well as the percentage, and Smithfield will be fuming from this so no doubt it'll bring them closer and more committed to the cause which spells bad news for everyone else.

Any reports from weekend?

Mr Beefy wrote:Any reports from weekend?

Here's a report for you - $7.50 for a can of Furphy is highway robbery!!

S Demon wrote:

Mr Beefy wrote:Any reports from weekend?

Here's a report for you - $7.50 for a can of Furphy is highway robbery!!

Can't argue with that but I dont drink the rubbish

The Bedge wrote:

Mr Beefy wrote:

watchdog wrote:Nice little % boster for the Dees on the weekend

Why Smithfield get their score wiped?

Lockleys snitched...

Refer to whufc post on previous page, that'll give a bit more of an idea.

Need Zedman or Giffo to confirm this - not great start to year if so??

Mr Beefy wrote:

S Demon wrote:

Mr Beefy wrote:Any reports from weekend?

Here's a report for you - $7.50 for a can of Furphy is highway robbery!!

Can't argue with that but I dont drink the rubbish

Neither did any of us!

Not sure I'd have the balls to snitch on Smithfield.