SAAFL Tribunal

[valleys07]

The tribunal decision with the st pauls bloke is a bit confusing at the end of the day, how does he get a 2 1/2 year ban but is still eligible to play again, yet the paralowie player from last year is suspended for less than half the amount of games, but is banned for life??? am i missing something here, please correct me if im wrong

My guess would be that he can play again in 2012, but not in the SAAFL

Yeah could be, it just reads that he is open to play in the saafl again in 2012. If so, then if i was the paralowie player id be feeling a little hard done by

[Bradman]

10/6/09 Andrew MacFarlan D7R St Pauls OS Striking an umpire Guilty – suspended until start of 2012

10 games plus finals.

North Pines guy goes up next week - if he bothers

Where did you blokes find this info?? How did the Ovies bloke go??
Well thats why they changed it because he couldnt. Probably shouldnt have bothered changing it, not sure if it will matter if he is there or not after that case

Elma got off the striking charge.

The 'contact' your player made is quite different to the contact the Saints player made, judging from descriptions on here. Although I still think they will be heavy handed, even on a squirt of water and tip of a cap.

The penalty they have handed down so far basically says that under NO circumstances is deliberate contact to be made with an umpire.

I Jorgy from Rosewater getting 9 games for squirting umpire 3 years ago
things have tightened up more now regarding umpires!
Could be another one in trouble

[jointman]

whats the difference between abusing an umpire and threating an umpire?

[Jimmy_041]

whats the difference between abusing an umpire and threating an umpire?

You're a blind c***

You're f****** dead, you blind c***

[jointman]

whats the difference between abusing an umpire and threating an umpire?

You're a blind c***

You're f****** dead, you blind c***

ha wankstain...

[carey]

with all this being said i dont care if people agree with me or not when you front the tribunal your result or outcome will depend on what club your from and what club you were playing against.

[woodublieve12]

with all this being said i dont care if people agree with me or not when you front the tribunal your result or outcome will depend on what club your from and what club you were playing against.

can't agree (i know you don't care) but surely it depends on the situation... however seeing the reports on the website, almost 3/4 of the reports made are from northern clubs.... what does that tell you???????

[carey18]

You tell us?

[woodublieve12]

You tell us?

poor discipline!!!!!

[woodublieve12]

The tribunal decision with the st pauls bloke is a bit confusing at the end of the day, how does he get a 2 1/2 year ban but is still eligible to play again, yet the paralowie player from last year is suspended for less than half the amount of games, but is banned for life??? am i missing something here, please correct me if im wrong

My guess would be that he can play again in 2012, but not in the SAAFL

Yeah could be, it just reads that he is open to play in the saafl again in 2012. If so, then if i was the paralowie player id be feeling a little hard done by

can't believe the st pauls bloke didn't get life...... DISGRACEFUL!!!

[carey18]

And you know this by?. We have had one guy suspended all season.

[woodublieve12]

And you know this by?. We have had one guy suspended all season.

i wasn't signalling one club, i was talking as a whole..... i was going on the stats...

[carey18]

Yeah and i was saying not to put our club in that bracket. Interesting thing today in our game when one of the opposition players called one our blokes a racial degrading name. You deserved to get smacked in the head every time u say that.

[Keepitreal]

Yeah and i was saying not to put our club in that bracket. Interesting thing today in our game when one of the opposition players called one our blokes a racial degrading name. You will get smacked in the head every time u say that.

Who called you a short old white guy?

[oldslow]

with all this being said i dont care if people agree with me or not when you front the tribunal your result or outcome will depend on what club your from and what club you were playing against.

Always has been

[Keepitreal]

with all this being said i dont care if people agree with me or not when you front the tribunal your result or outcome will depend on what club your from and what club you were playing against.

Always has been

And for some very good reasons for some particular clubs.

[oldslow]

with all this being said i dont care if people agree with me or not when you front the tribunal your result or outcome will depend on what club your from and what club you were playing against.

Always has been

And for some very good reasons for some particular clubs.

Bullshit should be the same for everyone

[woodublieve12]

Yeah and i was saying not to put our club in that bracket. Interesting thing today in our game when one of the opposition players called one our blokes a racial degrading name. You deserved to get smacked in the head every time u say that.

i do agree with that.....

[Keepitreal]

with all this being said i dont care if people agree with me or not when you front the tribunal your result or outcome will depend on what club your from and what club you were playing against.

Always has been

And for some very good reasons for some particular clubs.

Bullshit should be the same for everyone

Agree, but some clubs do build a reputation by the minority that effect the majority that stand by past deeds even when the club in question is trying to change.

[aceman]

with all this being said i dont care if people agree with me or not when you front the tribunal your result or outcome will depend on what club your from and what club you were playing against.

can't agree (i know you don't care) but surely it depends on the situation... however seeing the reports on the website, almost 3/4 of the reports made are from northern clubs.... what does that tell you???????

It doesn't tell you anything much at all. Maybe your perception of those clubs needs a revamp and possibly so too does the perception of some umpires who seem to take delight in reporting people just to get the $30 tea money for a Wed night out.
In my extended time in the SAAFL, I have never seen a worse group of umpires nor a bigger crop of overpowering people in charge of a footy game. Saw one yesterday in a Div 1 game, absolutely NFI but thought he was Ray Chamberlain and umpired just as poorly as he does.