by The Informer » Wed Aug 06, 2014 10:31 am
by jo172 » Wed Aug 06, 2014 10:47 am
The_Informer wrote:Whats everyones thoughts on this?
How will it be managed from a SAAFL level?
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 7014550342
by jo172 » Wed Aug 06, 2014 10:47 am
The_Informer wrote:Whats everyones thoughts on this?
How will it be managed from a SAAFL level?
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 7014550342
by SATCHEL » Wed Aug 06, 2014 12:03 pm
jo172 wrote:The_Informer wrote:Whats everyones thoughts on this?
How will it be managed from a SAAFL level?
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 7014550342
Seems bound to cause some tension with Uni's constitutional obligation not to pay players
by wristwatcher » Wed Aug 06, 2014 12:11 pm
jo172 wrote:The_Informer wrote:Whats everyones thoughts on this?
How will it be managed from a SAAFL level?
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 7014550342
Seems bound to cause some tension with Uni's constitutional obligation not to pay players
by Slots It Through » Wed Aug 06, 2014 2:01 pm
bird of prey wrote:Without sounding like I'm just trying to stir the pot here, but what's the story behind the scenes with port districts?
I'm hearing there's a lot of crap going on, which is the main reason for their "form slump".
Anyone heard anything, or is it just rumours?
by Look Good In Leather » Wed Aug 06, 2014 2:08 pm
SATCHEL wrote:jo172 wrote:The_Informer wrote:Whats everyones thoughts on this?
How will it be managed from a SAAFL level?
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... 7014550342
Seems bound to cause some tension with Uni's constitutional obligation not to pay players
I doubt this will get through. After the sh!t storm the initial proposal of having both sides in the SAAFL prior to the SANFL inclusion. Why would it be Pt Districts when the Power lose there zoning. Too much going on down there to be gifted this type of arrangement . Stranger things have happened.
by Alan » Wed Aug 06, 2014 2:15 pm
Slots It Through wrote:bird of prey wrote:Without sounding like I'm just trying to stir the pot here, but what's the story behind the scenes with port districts?
I'm hearing there's a lot of crap going on, which is the main reason for their "form slump".
Anyone heard anything, or is it just rumours?
What have you heard BOP? The list of players they have there, would suggest they should be going better than what they are?
by Fricky » Wed Aug 06, 2014 2:47 pm
Alan wrote:Slots It Through wrote:bird of prey wrote:Without sounding like I'm just trying to stir the pot here, but what's the story behind the scenes with port districts?
I'm hearing there's a lot of crap going on, which is the main reason for their "form slump".
Anyone heard anything, or is it just rumours?
What have you heard BOP? The list of players they have there, would suggest they should be going better than what they are?
I was told that there were a lot of players not happy with some of the selections, one in particular.
by bird of prey » Wed Aug 06, 2014 2:53 pm
Alan wrote:Slots It Through wrote:bird of prey wrote:Without sounding like I'm just trying to stir the pot here, but what's the story behind the scenes with port districts?
I'm hearing there's a lot of crap going on, which is the main reason for their "form slump".
Anyone heard anything, or is it just rumours?
What have you heard BOP? The list of players they have there, would suggest they should be going better than what they are?
I was told that there were a lot of players not happy with some of the selections, one in particular.
by Slots It Through » Wed Aug 06, 2014 3:03 pm
bird of prey wrote:Alan wrote:Slots It Through wrote:bird of prey wrote:Without sounding like I'm just trying to stir the pot here, but what's the story behind the scenes with port districts?
I'm hearing there's a lot of crap going on, which is the main reason for their "form slump".
Anyone heard anything, or is it just rumours?
What have you heard BOP? The list of players they have there, would suggest they should be going better than what they are?
I was told that there were a lot of players not happy with some of the selections, one in particular.
Yeah it's something along the lines of players taking issue with the coaching staff. I actually don't know any more than that. Just what I've heard through a friend of a friend of a friend, etc.....
Just wondering if it had any credibility or not.
by Cohiba » Wed Aug 06, 2014 4:50 pm
Slots It Through wrote:bird of prey wrote:Alan wrote:Slots It Through wrote:
What have you heard BOP? The list of players they have there, would suggest they should be going better than what they are?
I was told that there were a lot of players not happy with some of the selections, one in particular.
Yeah it's something along the lines of players taking issue with the coaching staff. I actually don't know any more than that. Just what I've heard through a friend of a friend of a friend, etc.....
Just wondering if it had any credibility or not.
I think you would find most clubs would have some issues in terms of players being selected, but are you referring to coach Mark Tylor selecting son Sam Tylor.
I saw Sam was in the best players on the weekend, so that would justify the selection wouldnt it?
by Footy Chick » Wed Aug 06, 2014 4:55 pm
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by marbles » Wed Aug 06, 2014 5:36 pm
by zedman » Wed Aug 06, 2014 5:41 pm
marbles wrote:i doubt the uni agrade coach would be happy, yeah sure crows take our best players
and what happens when uni get relegated to div 2
to make it fair all the div 1 clubs can be the reserves for the sanfl sides
adelaide - uni
port - port districts
norwood - rostrevor
sturt - goodwood
etc etc
by heater31 » Wed Aug 06, 2014 5:44 pm
zedman wrote:marbles wrote:i doubt the uni agrade coach would be happy, yeah sure crows take our best players
and what happens when uni get relegated to div 2
to make it fair all the div 1 clubs can be the reserves for the sanfl sides
adelaide - uni
port - port districts
norwood - rostrevor
sturt - goodwood
etc etc
goodwood is zoned to westies i think..
by Cohiba » Wed Aug 06, 2014 6:29 pm
Footy Chick wrote:I doubt it.. most clubs would have a myriad of selected folk giving their 3, 2, 1's.
Why punish your own kid by not naming him in the best players if he clearly was?
My mum was our netball coach in year 6 and was probably harder on me than everyone else, probably for that reason.
by bird of prey » Wed Aug 06, 2014 6:59 pm
Slots It Through wrote:bird of prey wrote:Alan wrote:Slots It Through wrote:
What have you heard BOP? The list of players they have there, would suggest they should be going better than what they are?
I was told that there were a lot of players not happy with some of the selections, one in particular.
Yeah it's something along the lines of players taking issue with the coaching staff. I actually don't know any more than that. Just what I've heard through a friend of a friend of a friend, etc.....
Just wondering if it had any credibility or not.
I think you would find most clubs would have some issues in terms of players being selected, but are you referring to coach Mark Tylor selecting son Sam Tylor.
I saw Sam was in the best players on the weekend, so that would justify the selection wouldnt it?
by marbles » Wed Aug 06, 2014 7:17 pm
by Boosh » Thu Aug 07, 2014 10:10 am
marbles wrote:yeah their agrade can play sanfl reserves & their bgrade div 7, cgrade div 7 reserves
but its bye bye div 1 for them
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |