Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015
Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:50 am
not just Henley, all clubs have until the end of the month to finalise C/D grade nominations.
carey wrote:Q. wrote:My weekend mail has Phil Dudley jumping ship to Angle Vale.
Must be flush with coin out there with Varcoe on $600 a game.
Varcoe ain't on anywhere near $600 a game.
scottroo wrote:confirmed wingfield gone
scottroo wrote:confirmed wingfield gone
Arch44 wrote:scottroo wrote:confirmed wingfield gone
That's very sad.
Mr Beefy wrote:Who is Chris Newman?
Arch44 wrote:So out of 60 clubs only 32 voted and 20 of those voted them out. Poor form by those that voted Wingies out IMO and why did the rest sit on there hands and not vote?
Esteban Vihaio wrote:I wonder if the outcome would have been different if another club was subject to the same voteI have never played against Wingfield and do not know any of their players. I have only heard of their reputation.
Mr Beefy wrote:Arch44 wrote:So out of 60 clubs only 32 voted and 20 of those voted them out. Poor form by those that voted Wingies out IMO and why did the rest sit on there hands and not vote?
You might pick up a few players.
Esteban Vihaio wrote:I wonder if the outcome would have been different if another club was subject to the same voteI have never played against Wingfield and do not know any of their players. I have only heard of their reputation.
jo172 wrote:Esteban Vihaio wrote:I wonder if the outcome would have been different if another club was subject to the same voteI have never played against Wingfield and do not know any of their players. I have only heard of their reputation.
Last time I played them a gentleman walked off the field screaming he was going to his car to get his 9mm to shoot our captain.
He returned without a pistol, but waited with several team mates around the other side of the clubroom to assault said captain and his 13 year old son after the game.
I cry no tears for them.
Arch44 wrote:jo172 wrote:Esteban Vihaio wrote:I wonder if the outcome would have been different if another club was subject to the same voteI have never played against Wingfield and do not know any of their players. I have only heard of their reputation.
Last time I played them a gentleman walked off the field screaming he was going to his car to get his 9mm to shoot our captain.
He returned without a pistol, but waited with several team mates around the other side of the clubroom to assault said captain and his 13 year old son after the game.
I cry no tears for them.
Doesn't mean the whole club is like that and they should fold.
Arch44 wrote:Mr Beefy wrote:Arch44 wrote:So out of 60 clubs only 32 voted and 20 of those voted them out. Poor form by those that voted Wingies out IMO and why did the rest sit on there hands and not vote?
You might pick up a few players.
You guys could too
twobob wrote:Arch44 wrote:Mr Beefy wrote:Arch44 wrote:So out of 60 clubs only 32 voted and 20 of those voted them out. Poor form by those that voted Wingies out IMO and why did the rest sit on there hands and not vote?
You might pick up a few players.
You guys could too
I would say that the vote went that way because if Wingfield were allowed exemption then it would of set a precedence for future clubs to be granted the same exemption. While i feel bad for Wingfield i think the correct decision was made.