Page 34 of 169

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

PostPosted: Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:50 am
by Footy Chick
not just Henley, all clubs have until the end of the month to finalise C/D grade nominations.

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

PostPosted: Mon Feb 23, 2015 11:15 am
by ROOBOY18
carey wrote:
Q. wrote:My weekend mail has Phil Dudley jumping ship to Angle Vale.

Must be flush with coin out there with Varcoe on $600 a game.


Varcoe ain't on anywhere near $600 a game.

$1000 ;)

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

PostPosted: Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:01 pm
by Q.
Wingfield goneski?

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

PostPosted: Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:33 pm
by scottroo
confirmed wingfield gone

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 8:09 am
by jo172
scottroo wrote:confirmed wingfield gone


So does this put Chris Newman's kill count at 2 clubs? (Ovingham and Wingfield)

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 8:12 am
by Dogwatcher
I'm sure there's someone here who might post in response to that.

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 8:21 am
by Mr Beefy
Who is Chris Newman?

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 8:37 am
by Arch44
scottroo wrote:confirmed wingfield gone

That's very sad.

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 10:04 am
by laser
Arch44 wrote:
scottroo wrote:confirmed wingfield gone

That's very sad.


Result was 12 in favour of granting them an exemption vs. 20 against. That means a lot abstained. The bloke from Wingies indicated they had enough players for a team, so they may have to think laterally to stay together. If there are enough lads wanting to play footy, let em play I say.

They mentioned a few single team clubs from last year, who will I assume feel some considerable pressure if they have to forfeit any games this season.

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 10:04 am
by ROOBOY18
Mr Beefy wrote:Who is Chris Newman?

Defender for Richmond ;)

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 10:06 am
by Arch44
So out of 60 clubs only 32 voted and 20 of those voted them out. Poor form by those that voted Wingies out IMO and why did the rest sit on there hands and not vote?

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 12:57 pm
by Esteban Vihaio
I wonder if the outcome would have been different if another club was subject to the same voteI have never played against Wingfield and do not know any of their players. I have only heard of their reputation.

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 1:03 pm
by Mr Beefy
Arch44 wrote:So out of 60 clubs only 32 voted and 20 of those voted them out. Poor form by those that voted Wingies out IMO and why did the rest sit on there hands and not vote?

You might pick up a few players.

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 1:08 pm
by jo172
Esteban Vihaio wrote:I wonder if the outcome would have been different if another club was subject to the same voteI have never played against Wingfield and do not know any of their players. I have only heard of their reputation.


Last time I played them a gentleman walked off the field screaming he was going to his car to get his 9mm to shoot our captain.

He returned without a pistol, but waited with several team mates around the other side of the clubroom to assault said captain and his 13 year old son after the game.

I cry no tears for them.

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 1:57 pm
by Arch44
Mr Beefy wrote:
Arch44 wrote:So out of 60 clubs only 32 voted and 20 of those voted them out. Poor form by those that voted Wingies out IMO and why did the rest sit on there hands and not vote?

You might pick up a few players.

You guys could too ;)

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 2:00 pm
by Arch44
Esteban Vihaio wrote:I wonder if the outcome would have been different if another club was subject to the same voteI have never played against Wingfield and do not know any of their players. I have only heard of their reputation.


More than likely

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 2:03 pm
by Arch44
jo172 wrote:
Esteban Vihaio wrote:I wonder if the outcome would have been different if another club was subject to the same voteI have never played against Wingfield and do not know any of their players. I have only heard of their reputation.


Last time I played them a gentleman walked off the field screaming he was going to his car to get his 9mm to shoot our captain.

He returned without a pistol, but waited with several team mates around the other side of the clubroom to assault said captain and his 13 year old son after the game.

I cry no tears for them.

Doesn't mean the whole club is like that and they should fold.

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 2:34 pm
by jo172
Arch44 wrote:
jo172 wrote:
Esteban Vihaio wrote:I wonder if the outcome would have been different if another club was subject to the same voteI have never played against Wingfield and do not know any of their players. I have only heard of their reputation.


Last time I played them a gentleman walked off the field screaming he was going to his car to get his 9mm to shoot our captain.

He returned without a pistol, but waited with several team mates around the other side of the clubroom to assault said captain and his 13 year old son after the game.

I cry no tears for them.

Doesn't mean the whole club is like that and they should fold.


How many chances should they get?

Honest question

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 2:37 pm
by twobob
Arch44 wrote:
Mr Beefy wrote:
Arch44 wrote:So out of 60 clubs only 32 voted and 20 of those voted them out. Poor form by those that voted Wingies out IMO and why did the rest sit on there hands and not vote?

You might pick up a few players.

You guys could too ;)


I would say that the vote went that way because if Wingfield were allowed exemption then it would of set a precedence for future clubs to be granted the same exemption. While i feel bad for Wingfield i think the correct decision was made.

Re: Ch9 AFL Division 7 - 2015

PostPosted: Tue Feb 24, 2015 2:38 pm
by jo172
twobob wrote:
Arch44 wrote:
Mr Beefy wrote:
Arch44 wrote:So out of 60 clubs only 32 voted and 20 of those voted them out. Poor form by those that voted Wingies out IMO and why did the rest sit on there hands and not vote?

You might pick up a few players.

You guys could too ;)


I would say that the vote went that way because if Wingfield were allowed exemption then it would of set a precedence for future clubs to be granted the same exemption. While i feel bad for Wingfield i think the correct decision was made.


If we're going to have the 2 team rule, but grant an exemption for the longest standing side with just 1 team it would seem a bit silly imo