SAAFL C1 2008

Adelaide Footy League Talk

Who do you think will win C1 in 2008?

Adelaide University
5
36%
Broadview
1
7%
Gaza
1
7%
Gepps Cross
0
No votes
Goodwood Saints
0
No votes
Port District
0
No votes
Rostrevor OC
0
No votes
Salisbury North
1
7%
Seaton Ramblers
1
7%
Tea Tree Gully
5
36%
 
Total votes : 14

SAAFL C1 2008

Postby Punk Rooster » Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:05 pm

Start your banter here...
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Re: SAAFL C1 2008

Postby BigDaddy » Thu Mar 20, 2008 9:26 am

Just out of curiosity... anyone know why Henley play in Div 7 as opposed to playing in C1?

Should be a cracker of a year!!
User avatar
BigDaddy
Under 16s
 
 
Posts: 350
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 10:55 am
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 7 times
Grassroots Team: Tea Tree Gully

Re: SAAFL C1 2008

Postby Punk Rooster » Thu Mar 20, 2008 10:02 am

BigDaddy wrote:Just out of curiosity... anyone know why Henley play in Div 7 as opposed to playing in C1?

Should be a cracker of a year!!

because they have a C & D grade?
ie Div 7 requires a 1st & 2nd side...
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Re: SAAFL C1 2008

Postby finn » Thu Mar 20, 2008 12:18 pm

BigDaddy wrote:Just out of curiosity... anyone know why Henley play in Div 7 as opposed to playing in C1?

Should be a cracker of a year!!


because they've been in div 7 for the at least the last three years and have nominated as a club to be in that division. just because a club has a c & d grade doesn't mean that they have to play div7 (or higher) - mitcham have c4 & c5, tea tree gully have c1 & c5, modbury c2 & c5 for some examples.
but, yes, 2008 should be another good year in c1 which can have some pretty handy players running around in it.
always forgive your enemies...nothing annoys them so much
finn
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: adelaide
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 22 times
Grassroots Team: Adelaide University

Re: SAAFL C1 2008

Postby NO-MERCY » Thu Mar 20, 2008 8:03 pm

Who's coaching Seaton C grade & how are the numbers look'n?
NO-MERCY
Coach
 
Posts: 5336
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:21 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 15 times

Re: SAAFL C1 2008

Postby finn » Tue Apr 08, 2008 1:33 pm

Gaza v Seaton Ramblers
Broadview v Salisbury North
Tea Tree Gully v Rostrevor OC
Goodwood Saints v Gepps Cross
Adelaide University v Port District
always forgive your enemies...nothing annoys them so much
finn
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: adelaide
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 22 times
Grassroots Team: Adelaide University

Re: SAAFL C1 2008

Postby LMA » Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:24 am

Shouldn't Uni's be in C2 coinciding with their A's

I see they do have a C2 side, that would explain !
User avatar
LMA
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:37 pm
Has liked: 387 times
Been liked: 714 times
Grassroots Team: Port District

Re: SAAFL C1 2008

Postby Punk Rooster » Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:14 pm

LMA wrote:Shouldn't Uni's be in C2 coinciding with their A's

I see they do have a C2 side, that would explain !

UNI's should have (imo)-
D2 & Reserves
D4 & Reserves
D6 & Reerves
D7 & Reserves or C2 & C4
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Re: SAAFL C1 2008

Postby finn » Wed Apr 16, 2008 4:01 pm

Punk Rooster wrote:
LMA wrote:Shouldn't Uni's be in C2 coinciding with their A's

I see they do have a C2 side, that would explain !

UNI's should have (imo)-
D2 & Reserves
D4 & Reserves
D6 & Reerves
D7 & Reserves or C2 & C4


um no. we've had div 6 for a few years as our c grade and they've often made the five but not the gf, we've had div 3-5 teams (c grade sides) in the late 80's but came religiously near the bottom - now with greater talent in these grades i'd suggest the results would see uni finish bottom.

last year we were relegated to div 7 from div 6, won c1 but finished outside the finals in c3, fourth or fifth in c4 and bottom in c6.

c1 sees out our fifth side take on div 1 c grade sides.

to answer the div 2 grades and c2 - the amateur league stuffed that one up with shoc's, athelstone, smosh and henley joining uni in runnin g their c grade in div 7. i'd have been happy for that system to continue as i believe it's been the best system in the many that the amateur league has tried over the years.

by the way how unusual were last saturday's results with 40 points being the smallest winning margin then 73 then 3 well over 100 points.
always forgive your enemies...nothing annoys them so much
finn
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: adelaide
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 22 times
Grassroots Team: Adelaide University

Re: SAAFL C1 2008

Postby S Demon » Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:42 pm

Punk Rooster wrote:
LMA wrote:Shouldn't Uni's be in C2 coinciding with their A's

I see they do have a C2 side, that would explain !

UNI's should have (imo)-
D2 & Reserves
D4 & Reserves
D6 & Reerves
D7 & Reserves or C2 & C4


Their C grade would get killed in div 4
User avatar
S Demon
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4611
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 11:44 am
Location: The Doghouse
Has liked: 314 times
Been liked: 372 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: SAAFL C1 2008

Postby roosters1 » Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:45 pm

Salisbury North have about 40 blokes to choose from.Ant word on any of the other teams.
I can't see broadys c's seeing out the year they are a joke, waste of time even playing.
They were kicking the ball the wrong way half the time
roosters1
Mini-League
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 12:56 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: SAAFL C1 2008

Postby finn » Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:03 pm

roosters1 wrote:Salisbury North have about 40 blokes to choose from.Ant word on any of the other teams.
I can't see broadys c's seeing out the year they are a joke, waste of time even playing.
They were kicking the ball the wrong way half the time


are salisbury north much different to last year though?
i'd expect tea tree gully and goodwood to be strong.
port districts had some very handy players but the team seems to lack a little depth.
always forgive your enemies...nothing annoys them so much
finn
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: adelaide
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 22 times
Grassroots Team: Adelaide University

Re: SAAFL C1 2008

Postby Shirtfront » Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:19 am

roosters1 wrote:Salisbury North have about 40 blokes to choose from.Ant word on any of the other teams.
I can't see broadys c's seeing out the year they are a joke, waste of time even playing.
They were kicking the ball the wrong way half the time


Cos they were made up of deaf guys. Good on em for having a go i reckon, just a percentage booster for other teams. No harm. they applied for a C7 position but in the amateur League's wisdom they denied it.
Shirtfront
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1139
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:17 pm
Location: Right up the middle
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Broadview

Re: SAAFL C1 2008

Postby LMA » Thu Apr 17, 2008 12:38 pm

finn wrote:
roosters1 wrote:Salisbury North have about 40 blokes to choose from.Ant word on any of the other teams.
I can't see broadys c's seeing out the year they are a joke, waste of time even playing.
They were kicking the ball the wrong way half the time


are salisbury north much different to last year though?
i'd expect tea tree gully and goodwood to be strong.
port districts had some very handy players but the team seems to lack a little depth.


Yeah i heard districts are struggling for numbers, should be alright with all the port magpies juniors being pushed thru the higher grades, expect to see them in the finals mix
User avatar
LMA
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:37 pm
Has liked: 387 times
Been liked: 714 times
Grassroots Team: Port District

Re: SAAFL C1 2008

Postby roosters1 » Thu Apr 17, 2008 2:42 pm

finn wrote:
roosters1 wrote:Salisbury North have about 40 blokes to choose from.Ant word on any of the other teams.
I can't see broadys c's seeing out the year they are a joke, waste of time even playing.
They were kicking the ball the wrong way half the time


are salisbury north much different to last year though?
i'd expect tea tree gully and goodwood to be strong.
port districts had some very handy players but the team seems to lack a little depth.

Yeah there's a few old boys that have come back to the club but I have not seen any other teams to compare them against.
roosters1
Mini-League
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 12:56 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: SAAFL C1 2008

Postby finn » Sun May 04, 2008 11:23 pm

travesty that amateur league forced the broadview club to play c1 with their mostly deaf side. they try hard and have some fun but getting pounded week in, week out will only demolish any confidence or spirit that they may have originally had. i'd think they'd still struggle even in c5 but at least they'd be in the game and probably win a few.
always forgive your enemies...nothing annoys them so much
finn
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: adelaide
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 22 times
Grassroots Team: Adelaide University

Re: SAAFL C1 2008

Postby Shirtfront » Mon May 12, 2008 12:21 pm

finn wrote:travesty that amateur league forced the broadview club to play c1 with their mostly deaf side. they try hard and have some fun but getting pounded week in, week out will only demolish any confidence or spirit that they may have originally had. i'd think they'd still struggle even in c5 but at least they'd be in the game and probably win a few.


Agreed, they are still enjoying it and great numbers back at the club on Sat nights but if the league won't change their stance next year, i think it could be all over, which is a shame cos it is a great initiative from both parties.
Shirtfront
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1139
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:17 pm
Location: Right up the middle
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Broadview

Re: SAAFL C1 2008

Postby finn » Mon May 12, 2008 7:42 pm

Shirtfront wrote:
finn wrote:travesty that amateur league forced the broadview club to play c1 with their mostly deaf side. they try hard and have some fun but getting pounded week in, week out will only demolish any confidence or spirit that they may have originally had. i'd think they'd still struggle even in c5 but at least they'd be in the game and probably win a few.


Agreed, they are still enjoying it and great numbers back at the club on Sat nights but if the league won't change their stance next year, i think it could be all over, which is a shame cos it is a great initiative from both parties.


i'd like to see them in perhaps c5 if c7 is considered too low for the occasional non-deaf player.
always forgive your enemies...nothing annoys them so much
finn
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: adelaide
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 22 times
Grassroots Team: Adelaide University


Board index   Football  Other Footy Leagues  Adelaide Footy League

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |