The current rule states that as long as you cough up the cash and you can safely play on the oval, then you're eligible.
The other rule that you need to be selling and sponsored by West End isn't usually adhered to though

Thoughts?
by Footy Chick » Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:17 pm
by Pag » Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:20 pm
Falcon Chick wrote:Discussion on another thread has questioned whether some clubs should be the recipients of home finals.
The current rule states that as long as you cough up the cash and you can safely play on the oval, then you're eligible.
The other rule that you need to be selling and sponsored by West End isn't usually adhered to though![]()
Thoughts?
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:22 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:22 pm
Pag wrote:Falcon Chick wrote:Discussion on another thread has questioned whether some clubs should be the recipients of home finals.
The current rule states that as long as you cough up the cash and you can safely play on the oval, then you're eligible.
The other rule that you need to be selling and sponsored by West End isn't usually adhered to though![]()
Thoughts?
Isn't the rule that you need to have West End on tap? Bit stiff, I think as long as it's being sold in can or stubbie form there shouldn't be any problem...
by Felch » Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:24 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:I think it's a bit wrong that it stops after the 2nd week of finals, minor premiers should have the easiest run as they earnt the right.
by Iron Fist » Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:26 pm
Pag wrote:Falcon Chick wrote:Discussion on another thread has questioned whether some clubs should be the recipients of home finals.
The current rule states that as long as you cough up the cash and you can safely play on the oval, then you're eligible.
The other rule that you need to be selling and sponsored by West End isn't usually adhered to though![]()
Thoughts?
Isn't the rule that you need to have West End on tap? Bit stiff, I think as long as it's being sold in can or stubbie form there shouldn't be any problem...
by Pag » Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:31 pm
Felch wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:I think it's a bit wrong that it stops after the 2nd week of finals, minor premiers should have the easiest run as they earnt the right.
I dont think it does, im pretty sure clubs can have home prelim finals.
by Robran » Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:34 pm
Falcon Chick wrote:Discussion on another thread has questioned whether some clubs should be the recipients of home finals.
The current rule states that as long as you cough up the cash and you can safely play on the oval, then you're eligible.
The other rule that you need to be selling and sponsored by West End isn't usually adhered to though![]()
Thoughts?
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:38 pm
Pag wrote:Felch wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:I think it's a bit wrong that it stops after the 2nd week of finals, minor premiers should have the easiest run as they earnt the right.
I dont think it does, im pretty sure clubs can have home prelim finals.
We had a home prelim final last year, stops at the GF.
by piccachu » Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:40 pm
it should be a rule that west end should be readily available all season at every club!!!!
by Pag » Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:42 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Pag wrote:Felch wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:I think it's a bit wrong that it stops after the 2nd week of finals, minor premiers should have the easiest run as they earnt the right.
I dont think it does, im pretty sure clubs can have home prelim finals.
We had a home prelim final last year, stops at the GF.
Oh well, I'll shut keep quiet and then people will only think I'm stupid
by BigDaddy » Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:42 pm
by Footy Chick » Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:45 pm
BigDaddy wrote:FC, the West End sponsorship rule is definitely adhered to. TTG haven't had a home final for years for that exact reason. We have had to play all home finals at neutral grounds for as long as I can remember (which isn't long mind you!!)
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:53 pm
by The Ash Man » Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:54 pm
Falcon Chick wrote:BigDaddy wrote:FC, the West End sponsorship rule is definitely adhered to. TTG haven't had a home final for years for that exact reason. We have had to play all home finals at neutral grounds for as long as I can remember (which isn't long mind you!!)
Well they must pick and choose who they apply it to then, because I can tell you PNU got stiffed in 2006 because Pembroke are sponsored by Coopers and still got a home final.
by Pag » Tue Jul 29, 2008 12:56 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Thanks Pag, I know what you look like, gotta love the budget
by Felch » Tue Jul 29, 2008 1:01 pm
by Iron Fist » Tue Jul 29, 2008 1:06 pm
Felch wrote:PAOC wouldnt have to worry about the West End issue - they dont even have a bar !!!![]()
All the top 5 D4 teams facilities are ok though, other than the condition of Mitcham's oval, and PAOC's lack of toilets/clubrooms.
Played a final at Pooraka last year, and they had a good set-up.
by Lightning McQueen » Wed Jul 30, 2008 10:13 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |