SA Footy

I note with interest that on the agenda of the next SAAFL delegates meeting an item relating to the current Chairperson is to be discussed and voted on.
Anybody got anything they can add or know about this? A particular reason or conflict maybe!

I heard something similar ace, David Green will be accompanied by his lawyer Greg Griffen to Amateur House next week.
Look out someone down there.

Before anyone wants to start throwing around bullshit or bagging the league, I'm putting everyone on their first warning right now.

This matter will be discussed in a civil manner and SAFooty Admin and moderators WILL NOT TOLERATE any slagging off of any member of the SAAFL executive committee or any rumour-milling relating to this subject.

Facts, as they come to hand are more than welcome to be discussed.

Anyone NOT complying with the above will have their post removed and receive an automatic ban as SAFooty will not be held responsible for any comment deemed slanderous or libelious.

Thanks in advance for your co-operation.

I watch with interest! Oh also, gday Ash.

aceman wrote:I note with interest that on the agenda of the next SAAFL delegates meeting an item relating to the current Chairperson is to be discussed and voted on.
Anybody got anything they can add or know about this? A particular reason or conflict maybe!

Oops sorry!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Forget I asked.

Bad Aceman

You have the right to remain silent anything you do say can and will be used in the SAAFL court of law.

Footy Chick wrote:Before anyone wants to start throwing around bullshit or bagging the league, I'm putting everyone on their first warning right now.

This matter will be discussed in a civil manner and SAFooty Admin and moderators WILL NOT TOLERATE any slagging off of any member of the SAAFL executive committee or any rumour-milling relating to this subject.

Facts, as they come to hand are more than welcome to be discussed.

Anyone NOT complying with the above will have their post removed and receive an automatic ban as SAFooty will not be held responsible for any comment deemed slanderous or libelious.

Thanks in advance for your co-operation.

One thinks one has a vested interest????
Our are we in a nazi state????????

Fishing again Shoe Boy?

I have no vested interest, I don't hold a position on the SAAFL board, nor am I a league delegate.

This was a decision made and agreed upon by admin and mods.

As usual, you're just taking every opportunity to shoot this messenger.

shoe boy

Any comments like that again, and you're banned. For good.

Smarten up.

perhaps this weeks delegates meeting has the theme; bring a friend night.
but more importantly if there truly is a problem? will there still be pies and pasties for the delegates.
im sure the saafl wont miss a beat and if there is/was any problem itll be smoothed out in no time.after all we all have the common goal of having the best amateur league in australia

shoe boy wrote:

Footy Chick wrote:Before anyone wants to start throwing around bullshit or bagging the league, I'm putting everyone on their first warning right now.

This matter will be discussed in a civil manner and SAFooty Admin and moderators WILL NOT TOLERATE any slagging off of any member of the SAAFL executive committee or any rumour-milling relating to this subject.

Facts, as they come to hand are more than welcome to be discussed.

Anyone NOT complying with the above will have their post removed and receive an automatic ban as SAFooty will not be held responsible for any comment deemed slanderous or libelious.

Thanks in advance for your co-operation.

One thinks one has a vested interest????
Our are we in a nazi state????????

I deeply apologise if I offended anyone with my comments and will restrain from making an opinion that some disagree with.

Sincerly
Shoe Boy

Your smart arse reply, even when warned by another moderator shows the lack of respect you have.

1 : No, the "one" does not have a "vested interst"

2 : No, we do not live in a "Nazi state"

3 : If this site is drawn into legal proceedings by such topics being discussed when the out come has yet to be resloved, is it fair to say you would be happy to be held liable for such proceedings?

I take it you will be more than happy to accept and fight any potential legal disputes. From all the Moderators, thankyou for accepting this responsibility.

Question to the mods ...if this topic is potentially 'hot' why not just remove it ?? That way any possibility of poor or ill informed comment is eliminated.

turk186 wrote:Question to the mods ...if this topic is potentially 'hot' why not just remove it ?? That way any possibility of poor or ill informed comment is eliminated.

Just keeping people informed as to whats going on mate.
If we didnt put up a post like this and just started deleting stuff people would wonder what the hell is going on.

Wedgie wrote:

turk186 wrote:Question to the mods ...if this topic is potentially 'hot' why not just remove it ?? That way any possibility of poor or ill informed comment is eliminated.

Just keeping people informed as to whats going on mate.
If we didnt put up a post like this and just started deleting stuff people would wonder what the hell is going on.

Maybe people want it to come out but don't want to be involved ???
Just a theory??

Good theory.

People aren't going discuss which way they're going to vote on here anyway, lets face it.

Let Humphrey Bear talk about it all he wants

Mr Magoo wrote:Let Humphrey Bear talk about it all he wants

He can't afford to

what is the issue any way. Im not trying to cause an all out verbal war. Is there like an AGM happening? Is it like how Canberra works with a certain amount of time in the job and then have to move on