SA Footy

A couple of interesting discussions last night on some "touchy" subjects. I reckon this fella might have been a visitor there too!

Sorry, I didnt see any rabbits there Ace, maybe a few turkeys, but no rabbits

Footy Chick wrote:Sorry, I didnt see any rabbits there Ace, maybe a few turkeys, but no rabbits

Well FC, all I can say is that you were obviously not looking in the same direction as I was!

aceman wrote:

Footy Chick wrote:Sorry, I didnt see any rabbits there Ace, maybe a few turkeys, but no rabbits

Well FC, all I can say is that you were obviously not looking in the same direction as I was!

Oh, the penny just dropped.

aceman wrote:A couple of interesting discussions last night on some "touchy" subjects. I reckon this fella might have been a visitor there too!

Are you going to say what these interesting discussions were or just talk in riddles?

Mr Beefy wrote:

aceman wrote:A couple of interesting discussions last night on some "touchy" subjects. I reckon this fella might have been a visitor there too!

Are you going to say what these interesting discussions were or just talk in riddles?

My thoughts exactly, i keep checking back hoping someone took the BS mask off and actually put something up here that is readable.

Mr Beefy wrote:

aceman wrote:A couple of interesting discussions last night on some "touchy" subjects. I reckon this fella might have been a visitor there too!

Are you going to say what these interesting discussions were or just talk in riddles?

Noone 'talking in riddles' here!

The delegates spoke out about several issues "en masse". They made it quite clear that several agenda items they would not be bluffed with;

Rep game v/s Broken Hill - cost excessive
Advertising - sponsorship not as advised at AGM
Community Football Board - the clubs will not accept being dictated to by the CFB
1/ CFB uniform logos not to apply in SAAFL
2/ Points system to be trialled over a 3 year period, not 1 year

That's a start for you blokes to work with.

Oh, I should have known that is what the rabbit meant...

Mr Beefy wrote:Oh, I should have known that is what the rabbit meant...

You had to be there to get the gist of that, my apologies.

Refer http://www.safooty.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=26804&start=0

aceman wrote:

Mr Beefy wrote:

aceman wrote:A couple of interesting discussions last night on some "touchy" subjects. I reckon this fella might have been a visitor there too!

Are you going to say what these interesting discussions were or just talk in riddles?

Noone 'talking in riddles' here!

The delegates spoke out about several issues "en masse". They made it quite clear that several agenda items they would not be bluffed with;

Rep game v/s Broken Hill - cost excessive
Advertising - sponsorship not as advised at AGM
Community Football Board - the clubs will not accept being dictated to by the CFB
1/ CFB uniform logos not to apply in SAAFL
2/ Points system to be trialled over a 3 year period, not 1 year

That's a start for you blokes to work with.

agreed ace, there was some healthy open discussion with even differed opinions between clubs. i sense those at the front table representing exec were feeling the heat but i reckon the meeting went in the right direction.
the advertising s'ship questions were not handled well and raised some concern as to where that is headed and how media will be funded.
can anyone remind me of the outcome of the division by division medal count dinner, did it get voted down?

yeah it was - thank god for that.

Another casualty from themeeting with J Schultz resigning over the way it is run..when will these clowns learn to keep MS away from a keyboard.

If true John will be be sadly missed

turk186 wrote:Another casualty from themeeting with J Schultz resigning over the way it is run..when will these clowns learn to keep MS away from a keyboard.

If true John will be be sadly missed

It is correct, sadly!

That is a bad outcome only winner from that will be Kenilworth he'll have more time to plot their resurgence.

There is only one resignation that I would be happy with ...

Guess who??

turk186 wrote:There is only one resignation that I would be happy with ...

Guess who??

May well be a "second one" on that list.
There are a couple of very strong pieces of communication doing the rounds.