SA Footy

So, points deduction to follow?

So why do my post get deleted? To close to the truth?

Any word on Stent?

I'd heard on Tuesday the Kangeroo court sorry I mean tribunal had their minds made up on Stent- 2 weeks and if Salisbury Norths lawyer made the umpire look as stupid as he did 2 weeks ago 1 week if not 5 weeks. Tribunals minds were made up well before the tribunal even sat!

Stent is the victim of the league hating the footy budget and Drainer the fact the tribunal got embarrassed by a lawyer 2 weeks ago.

Take that to the bank people.

Didn't a Supreme Court Judge chair the tribunal a fortnight ago? Generally not the type to consider themselves embarassed by a lawyer

carey wrote:I'd heard on Tuesday the Kangeroo court sorry I mean tribunal had their minds made up on Stent- 2 weeks and if Salisbury Norths lawyer made the umpire look as stupid as he did 2 weeks ago 1 week if not 5 weeks. Tribunals minds were made up well before the tribunal even sat!

Stent is the victim of the league hating the footy budget and Drainer the fact the tribunal got embarrassed by a lawyer 2 weeks ago.

Take that to the bank people.

What BILE exists in your gut that you think the League have ANY agenda against any club - they merely ask that ALL clubs and players abide by the stringent rules they (oh, and the CLUBS have voted for) implemented.

This League can hold its head up for eradicating (to the best of their ability) thuggery and miscreants from this competition for the betterment of all.

What a bitter little person you must be....

carey wrote:I'd heard on Tuesday the Kangeroo court sorry I mean tribunal had their minds made up on Stent- 2 weeks and if Salisbury Norths lawyer made the umpire look as stupid as he did 2 weeks ago 1 week if not 5 weeks. Tribunals minds were made up well before the tribunal even sat!

Stent is the victim of the league hating the footy budget and Drainer the fact the tribunal got embarrassed by a lawyer 2 weeks ago.

Take that to the bank people.

Have you got Hosie's hand up your arse?

carey wrote:So why do my post get deleted? To close to the truth?

Get off the cans mate.

Nothing has been deleted from this thread since June 28, you probably didn't even post it properly in the first place

Stent 2, DRAINER 5......

SKUNK wrote:Stent 2, DRAINER 5......

If true i'd expect Drainer & SN to appeal..

Zartan wrote:

SKUNK wrote:Stent 2, DRAINER 5......

If true i'd expect Drainer & SN to appeal..

Pretty sure it is true. What would be the grounds for their appeal? SAAFL didn't waste much time deducting the 5 points off Salisbury North....now sitting on -3. Gotta feel for their players....what are they playing for now?

Not to suggest they would, but given the AAA has pretty much condemned SN to relegation the League might have created a much bigger Alastair Lynch circa 2004 Grand Final problem.

Why is the league so slow in recording tribunal results on their web site?
One hearing from 5/7, still no result.
Let alone yesterday's results.
Carrier pigeon stuff.
This is 2017 not 1967!

jo172 wrote:Not to suggest they would, but given the AAA has pretty much condemned SN to relegation the League might have created a much bigger Alastair Lynch circa 2004 Grand Final problem.

Doubt that will happen. One more incident and they may not be allowed to play the remainder of the season, if they have that attitude then that's what they deserve. Can't believe the amount of people on here on Salisbury North's side, if you saw the video, then 3 to 5 games is fair. Every other Club in comp gets it, why can't they?? See if they can get their act together as a Club in Div 2 next year, get rid of their undisciplined players and play the ball and not the man. Or just continue to whinge on here about how hard done by they are. Will never improve or get better if they keep doing that!

jo172 wrote:Not to suggest they would, but given the AAA has pretty much condemned SN to relegation the League might have created a much bigger Alastair Lynch circa 2004 Grand Final problem.

Wouldn't want to start their A2 campaign on negative points, that would certainly sink the club I would think.....

Senor Moto Gadili wrote:

Zartan wrote:

SKUNK wrote:Stent 2, DRAINER 5......

If true i'd expect Drainer & SN to appeal..

Pretty sure it is true. What would be the grounds for their appeal? SAAFL didn't waste much time deducting the 5 points off Salisbury North....now sitting on -3. Gotta feel for their players....what are they playing for now?

Match payments........

VALE PARK wrote:Why is the league so slow in recording tribunal results on their web site?
One hearing from 5/7, still no result.
Let alone yesterday's results.
Carrier pigeon stuff.
This is 2017 not 1967!

Up now. http://www.adelaidefootball.com.au/wp-c ... ebsite.pdf

laser wrote:

VALE PARK wrote:Why is the league so slow in recording tribunal results on their web site?
One hearing from 5/7, still no result.
Let alone yesterday's results.
Carrier pigeon stuff.
This is 2017 not 1967!

Up now. http://www.adelaidefootball.com.au/wp-c ... ebsite.pdf

The 'league' reads this forum, a lot!

Looking at the games given throughout the whole season the 5 games is what was given for the same offence.

Their only defence for appeal would be video evidence, considering that's what sunk him, appeal board would be closed,