Adelaide Footy League Division 2 - 2019

[whufc]

Whilst I don’t condone what our lad did and he will be dealt with by the tribunal.However he received a free for A high tackle not against him for holding the ball, just to clear that up.

What is his record like, has he been reported previously?

[TIRED TIGER]

Not sure only his 2nd year back at broadies.

[the joker]

Heard talk of a sling tackle but nothing else.

Red card was withdrawn by the ump once he saw the video apparently.

Is it this one?

https://www.dartfish.tv/Player?CR=p1320 ... 01m4770466

@ 41:16.

Hard to see un umpire watching that and changing his mind.

why hard to see? Wasn’t a sling. Didn’t have his arms held. And didn’t get hurt


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[The Big Shrek]

I think it’s worth about 8-10. If the Seaton guy wasn’t hurt then it shouldn’t be instant deregistration. I know people will say his intent is obviously very relevant here, however the actual injury seems to carry more weight than intent these days (see Andrew Gaff). If he’s got no prior record that gives him a second shot after a lengthy suspension.

[whufc]

I think it’s worth about 8-10. If the Seaton guy wasn’t hurt then it shouldn’t be instant deregistration. I know people will say his intent is obviously very relevant here, however the actual injury seems to carry more weight than intent these days (see Andrew Gaff). If he’s got no prior record that gives him a second shot after a lengthy suspension.

I could live with that but would have no issue if they did deregister.

[The Bedge]

I think it’s worth about 8-10. If the Seaton guy wasn’t hurt then it shouldn’t be instant deregistration. I know people will say his intent is obviously very relevant here, however the actual injury seems to carry more weight than intent these days (see Andrew Gaff). If he’s got no prior record that gives him a second shot after a lengthy suspension.

You should be a lawyer!

[jo172]

Interesting to note Rule 10.26 "The League retains the right to withdraw or rescind a player’s registration or transfer" that sits there, for the moment unused

[The Bedge]

https://www.dartfish.tv/Player?CR=p132071c307101m4770473 around the 17 minute mark first quarter

17:20 - 17:22.. watching Harris, inspects his right hand and shows the umpire.. why would you show the umpire your hand - unless perhaps you were bitten?

Although Harris might also be in a bit of trouble for the sneaky little right hand jab he lands at 17:04.

Ah good fun, never a dull moment.

[shoe boy]

Heard talk of a sling tackle but nothing else.

Red card was withdrawn by the ump once he saw the video apparently.

Is it this one?

https://www.dartfish.tv/Player?CR=p1320 ... 01m4770466

@ 41:16.

Hard to see un umpire watching that and changing his mind.

why hard to see? Wasn’t a sling. Didn’t have his arms held. And didn’t get hurt


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Who signed off on the ground report with a slips cradle behind the point post? (accident waiting to happen)

[Lightning McQueen]

Who signed off on the ground report with a slips cradle behind the point post? (accident waiting to happen)

That's the mobile stretcher mate, the driver must've ducked out for a durry.

[Senor Moto Gadili]

I think it’s worth about 8-10. If the Seaton guy wasn’t hurt then it shouldn’t be instant deregistration. I know people will say his intent is obviously very relevant here, however the actual injury seems to carry more weight than intent these days (see Andrew Gaff). If he’s got no prior record that gives him a second shot after a lengthy suspension.

Intentional/High/High is 6-8 weeks, so I reckon they might go the upper end and give him 8. Hopefully he learns a lesson and keeps his nose clean because he's a very good player.

[The Big Shrek]

Would have been heard last night. Anyone know the outcome?

[The Bedge]

Would have been heard last night. Anyone know the outcome?

5

[jake the snake]

Wow that is super low.

You get 4 for calling the umpire a cheat

[jo172]

How does Intentional/Medium/High lead to only 5? Note a bloke from Henley got intentional/high/high and only got 6?

League seems to be going backwards.

[Eagles2014]

How does Intentional/Medium/High lead to only 5? Note a bloke from Henley got intentional/high/high and only got 6?

League seems to be going backwards.

Think that Henley B Grader was behind play too, just unlucky got caught on video by someone from Districts.

Both appear light on to how they have been dealing with these incidents last couple of years!

[Trader]

Piss-weak by the league.
@Jimmy_041 buggers off to Sydney and the clowns at HQ loose their balls to do what's right.

[Wasim1]

How does Intentional/Medium/High lead to only 5? Note a bloke from Henley got intentional/high/high and only got 6?

League seems to be going backwards.

Think that Henley B Grader was behind play too, just unlucky got caught on video by someone from Districts.

Both appear light on to how they have been dealing with these incidents last couple of years!


/quot

Depends on who is sitting around the table by the looks of it.
Six should have been minimum but maybe they felt sorry for him

[The Bedge]

Depends on who is sitting around the table by the looks of it.
Six should have been minimum but maybe they felt sorry for him

Maybe some credit should be given to whoever was representing him at the Tribunal, clearly they were able to prove that the impact was medium and the penalty guidelines do indicate that's a guideline match penalty of 4-6wks.

[footys the winner]

Depends on who is sitting around the table by the looks of it.
Six should have been minimum but maybe they felt sorry for him

Maybe some credit should be given to whoever was representing him at the Tribunal, clearly they were able to prove that the impact was medium and the penalty guidelines do indicate that's a guideline match penalty of 4-6wks.

If he was to punch once instead of 3 times would he have only received 2 weeks? Genuine question