SA Footy

locky801 wrote:

Jimmy_041 wrote:

locky801 wrote:

Bluedemon wrote:
12 games I think

thought it was 16 but might be wrong

You're out of the AdFL with =/>12 games and all AFL with =/>16 games

thanks for the clarification Jim

I reckon you knew that - playing possum Locky?

The Bedge wrote:Game total by week:
Trial: 9
Wk 1: 14
Wk 2: 8
Wk 3: 26
Wk 4: 16
Wk 5: 16
Wk 6: 22
Wk 7: 20
Wk 8: 43* (Cam Matters incident still to be heard)

Your original prediction for Round 8 was massive unders, Bedge!! Can't believe how many 'dangerous tackles' are still occurring every round.

MoP wrote:

The Bedge wrote:Game total by week:
Trial: 9
Wk 1: 14
Wk 2: 8
Wk 3: 26
Wk 4: 16
Wk 5: 16
Wk 6: 22
Wk 7: 20
Wk 8: 43* (Cam Matters incident still to be heard)

Your original prediction for Round 8 was massive unders, Bedge!! Can't believe how many 'dangerous tackles' are still occurring every round.

We had a fella get weeks for a ‘dangerous tackle’ and there was absolutely nothing in it , game wasn’t even recorded so not sure how they’ve decided to come up with the suspension

Burner wrote:

MoP wrote:

The Bedge wrote:Game total by week:
Trial: 9
Wk 1: 14
Wk 2: 8
Wk 3: 26
Wk 4: 16
Wk 5: 16
Wk 6: 22
Wk 7: 20
Wk 8: 43* (Cam Matters incident still to be heard)

Your original prediction for Round 8 was massive unders, Bedge!! Can't believe how many 'dangerous tackles' are still occurring every round.

We had a fella get weeks for a ‘dangerous tackle’ and there was absolutely nothing in it , game wasn’t even recorded so not sure how they’ve decided to come up with the suspension

I'm with you, Burner. I think there has been a massive over-correction with the 'dangerous tackle'.

We had a fella get weeks for a ‘dangerous tackle’ and there was absolutely nothing in it , game wasn’t even recorded so not sure how they’ve decided to come up with the suspension

Appeal it?

The Bedge wrote:Game total by week:
Trial: 9
Wk 1: 14
Wk 2: 8
Wk 3: 26
Wk 4: 16
Wk 5: 16
Wk 6: 22
Wk 7: 20
Wk 8: 43* (Cam Matters incident still to be heard)

I am intrigued in something, with Cam Matters incident of striking being delayed until next week, wouldnt it be risky to play him this week in case he does something silly again

Bluedemon wrote:

The Bedge wrote:Game total by week:
Trial: 9
Wk 1: 14
Wk 2: 8
Wk 3: 26
Wk 4: 16
Wk 5: 16
Wk 6: 22
Wk 7: 20
Wk 8: 43* (Cam Matters incident still to be heard)

I am intrigued in something, with Cam Matters incident of striking being delayed until next week, wouldnt it be risky to play him this week in case he does something silly again

I thought there was a rule prohibiting playing players awaiting their hearing?

(may be mistaken, but if not, there should be)

redyellow&blue wrote:

We had a fella get weeks for a ‘dangerous tackle’ and there was absolutely nothing in it , game wasn’t even recorded so not sure how they’ve decided to come up with the suspension

Appeal it?

The flip side of the game not being recorded is we have no vision to back our case, not worth copping extra weeks on the small chance we’d be able to over turn it

tribunal from round 9


Week 9
28/05/2022 15/06/2022 Cameron Matters Trinity OS 6 Men Striking Intentional Body Low Guilty 2
04/06/2022 MRP Nick Gillard Walkerville 4 Men Striking Careless High Low Accept 2 + (1)
04/06/2022 MRP James O’Loughlin Central United 6 Men Dangerous Tackle Careless Body Medium Accept 2 + (1)
04/06/2022 MRP Reece Johnston West Croydon 6 Men Striking Intentional High Low Accept 4
04/06/2022 Prescribed Jordan Dienelt Mitchell Park 7R Men Undue Rough Play Accept 1 + (1)
04/06/2022 MRP Jarrod Grove PHOS C2 Men Striking Intentional High Low Accept 3 + (1)

am Bays wrote:What was the Brighton bloke thinking after he had a team mate suspended in Rd 7 and all the hoo ha from rd 1, Slow learner??

The tackle did get paid holding the ball and 50 paid for carry on from the opponent. Non controlling umpire called the dangerous tackle. One of the worst display of umpiring I've seen

can anyone link this weeks (round 10) tribunal?

It’s not released until Thursday

scottroo wrote:It’s not released until Thursday

Has it been released yet or do they release it Thursday night?

When the weekly update is released, generally mid afternoon

Seems an unusual feature of dangerous tackle suspensions is that they seem to be clustered within one game (and often within one team within that game) on a week to week basis.

Presumably there's some psychology underlying this but it's certainly a feature this year (noting two Goodwood players and three North Haven Players were done this week)

Irony too with the Goodwood blokes getting done in the return match against Brighton.

Week 10
18/06/2022 MRP Raeth Wordingham (Coach) Hope Valley 3 Women Intimidation of Umpire 5 games
Raeth Wordingham (Coach) Hope Valley 3 Women 2 Suspended from previous Charge 2 games
18/06/2022 Inv (Complaint) Matthew Brunoli Old Ignatians 1 Men Front on Contact Careless High Low Accept 2 + (1)
18/06/2022 MRP Reece Slape Goodwood 1 Men Dangerous Tackle Careless High Medium Accept 3 + (1)
18/06/2022 MRP Harrison Nolen Goodwood 1 Men Dangerous Tackle Careless High Low Accept 2
Harrison Nolen Goodwood 1 Men 2 Suspended from previous Charge 2
18/06/2022 MRP Kyran Dickson North Haven 2 Men Dangerous Tackle Careless High Low Accept 2 + (1)
18/06/2022 MRP Matthew Reed North Haven 2 Men Dangerous Tackle Careless High Low Accept 2 + (1)
18/06/2022 MRP Brett Pederson North Haven 2 Men Dangerous Tackle Careless High Low 2 + (1)
18/06/2022 MRP Jack McCafferty North Haven 2 Men Striking Careless High Low Accept 2 + (1)
18/06/2022 MRP Brett Bow Kilburn 5R Men Dangerous Tackle Careless High Low Accept 2 + (1)
18/06/2022 Inv (Complaint) Nathan Scott Brahma Lodge 6 Men Undue Rough Play Careless Body Low Accept 2 + (1)
18/06/2022 MRP Matthew Paine Hackham 7 Men Undue Rough Play Intentional Body Low Accept 3
Matthew Paine Hackham 7 Men 1 Suspended from previous Charge 1
18/06/2022 MRP Dean Faulkner North Haven C2 Men Striking Careless Body Low Accept 2 + (1)

jo172 wrote:Seems an unusual feature of dangerous tackle suspensions is that they seem to be clustered within one game (and often within one team within that game) on a week to week basis.

I'm curious how the dangerous tackles are found/reported etc. - does an umpire highlight in his report to review it? Do clubs "dob" in opposition tackles?

I know of a game on the weekend received 4x yellow cards for dangerous tackles, but not one report.. yet sides like North Haven and Goodwood have been slammed.

On another note, surely the Hope Valley Women's coach is tapped on the shoulder and told don't bother coming back.. twice in the same season for umpire intimidation / abuse charges.

Reflecting it might be circumstances where if there's 2 or 3 dangerous tackles where blokes get hurt/rattled you might be more inclined to look over the video, whereas if it's only one it doesn't stick out in anybody's memory enough to warrant a review.

And twice in one season for anyone for umpire abuse is deplorable. But particularly for women's footy in that it's still a lot of teaching rather than win at all costs going on. Most disturbing.

I know north haven used 3 tackles from the same game from the opposition as examples to try and help get theirs off, some of which were called holding the ball, and were told they to would also be suspended if a complaint was lodged, so clearly the umpires can’t differentiate between a dangerous tackle and a good one. Beyond a joke

Out of curiosity are these 'dangerous tackles' that are seeing players get suspended 'sling' tackles or are they ones where blokes are driving players into the ground (generally head first).