by Punk Rooster » Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:52 am
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by rod_rooster » Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:56 am
by Punk Rooster » Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:02 am
rod_rooster wrote:My comments regarding Johnson bowling crap have nothing to do with Tait. Johnson has talent and a lot of potential but of late he has been bowling crap. Simple as that. Tait has nothing to do with it. For what it's worth Tait was also guilty of bowling crap yesterday.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by mal » Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:30 am
SJABC wrote:MAY-Z wrote:Booney wrote:Australia in front.Laxman and Dravid should be hauled over the coals for the manner of their dismissals in the last half hour of day 1.
which is a half hour that shouldnt even be played- the over rates are terrible yet the icc continue to do nothing about it- 84 overs in 6 and a half hours of cricket is pathetic.
every team in world cricket is guilty of this but nothing is ever done about it
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Piss weak effort in the over rate...BOTH teams this series have been jokes in that regard. Forget the other carp that's been going on, and get the teams to play the 90 overs....
Ponting erred IMO in not allowing Tait to bowl with the wind in his back early on. Tait...relex...and the wickets will come.
Australia just in fron. Will need to bowl India out well and truly by lunch....
by Dirko » Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:41 am
by MAY-Z » Thu Jan 17, 2008 11:48 am
mal wrote:SJABC wrote:MAY-Z wrote:Booney wrote:Australia in front.Laxman and Dravid should be hauled over the coals for the manner of their dismissals in the last half hour of day 1.
which is a half hour that shouldnt even be played- the over rates are terrible yet the icc continue to do nothing about it- 84 overs in 6 and a half hours of cricket is pathetic.
every team in world cricket is guilty of this but nothing is ever done about it
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Piss weak effort in the over rate...BOTH teams this series have been jokes in that regard. Forget the other carp that's been going on, and get the teams to play the 90 overs....
Ponting erred IMO in not allowing Tait to bowl with the wind in his back early on. Tait...relex...and the wickets will come.
Australia just in fron. Will need to bowl India out well and truly by lunch....
PERSPECTIVE
second innings this test
lets not bowl one of TAIT or MJ or LEE or CLARK for the innings
lets bowl SYMONDS/CLARKE or HUSSEY
lets get the 90 overs in
lets give the batsman all the luxuries that modern cricket has afforded
?????????????
quite simply the game may never allow 4 quicks to bowl all day in Test Matches ?
by am Bays » Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:21 pm
MAY-Z wrote:the wonder elephant wrote:do they still fine teams 4 slow overrates ? if they do its should be a big one otherwise its not worth it with all the money around in todays game.maybe they should think off a penalty in runs ie.for overs not bowled the batting side should be given runs at there scoring rate ..eg..yesterday aust bowled 84 overs 6 short ...india scored at 3.5 per over therefore penilise aust 21 runs for slow overate ....thoughts
i think that is on teh right line- runs will be the only way that teams will learn- although it would be more than what you have suggested there as at scheduled stumps they wouldve only bowled about 78 overs so it should be 12 overs of penalties
by westcoastpanther » Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:40 pm
by Pup » Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:40 pm
RoosterMarty wrote:Brilliant catch by Tait,
by BIG SEXY » Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:57 pm
westcoastpanther wrote:Slow over rate is good for the Perth test, gives you more to watch after work with a coldie.....
by mal » Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:01 pm
by RustyCage » Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:03 pm
by Pup » Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:30 pm
by Stumps » Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:34 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:MAY-Z wrote:Booney wrote:Australia in front.Laxman and Dravid should be hauled over the coals for the manner of their dismissals in the last half hour of day 1.
which is a half hour that shouldnt even be played- the over rates are terrible yet the icc continue to do nothing about it- 84 overs in 6 and a half hours of cricket is pathetic.
every team in world cricket is guilty of this but nothing is ever done about it
One of the commentators during the West Indies v Sth Africa Test suggest a three match suspension for the offending skipper! Still, I don't buy the 'half an hour that shouldn't have been played' bit though. Most Test cricketers have learnt to ration out there concentration reserves for when it is required (i.e. When the ball is live) for 90 overs.
Another interesting comment was the diminishing level of concentration world wide by Test cricketers caused by One day and now 20 Twenty 'cricket'.
So who does have the power of concentration?
Hayden
Ponting
Hussey
Dravid
Tendulkar
Laxman
Bell
Collingwood
Chanderpaul
Kallis
Sangakarra
Jawayadenre ((!$%%#@!!!) great spelling....
Any others? That's not many in World Cricket is it?
It wasn't the over rate or additional time that caused those wickets to fall, only a momentary lapse of reason (There'll be no sleep in here tonight
regards,
REB
by rod_rooster » Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:40 pm
Pup wrote:I like Pathan
He is energetic, You can see he wants to score runs, runs really hard between the wickets and forces his partner to go with him. Exactly what India need IMO. I hope he scores some runs.
by mal » Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:42 pm
rod_rooster wrote:Pup wrote:I like Pathan
He is energetic, You can see he wants to score runs, runs really hard between the wickets and forces his partner to go with him. Exactly what India need IMO. I hope he scores some runs.
I've always thought he was an excellent cricketer and i cannot understand why he didn't play the first two tests.
by Pup » Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:01 pm
by Pup » Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:04 pm
by mal » Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:05 pm
by rod_rooster » Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:06 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |