by FlyingHigh » Thu Dec 17, 2009 8:51 am
by Dutchy » Thu Dec 17, 2009 9:32 am
Stumps wrote:Dutchy wrote:2 tons in 25 digs...outstanding?
rephrase to very good.runs dont lie and hes made plenty of them of late. i think you made a big comment early about him and your trying to justify it dutchy
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Dec 17, 2009 9:39 am
FlyingHigh wrote:WI - day one @ Perth - 90 overs. 11 minutes overtime taken up with four delays for Ponting to receive Physio treatment, ie what the extra 1/2 hour was designed for. One challenge, three wickets.
AUS - day one @ Adelaide - 85 overs including 30 minutes overtime. 6 wickets, 3 (?) challenges.
How come the Windies can do it but we can't?
by Bum Crack » Thu Dec 17, 2009 9:57 am
by Dirko » Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:00 am
Bum Crack wrote:Is it just me, or do other people think Justin Langer is a terrible commentator?? Everytime I hear his voice, I just want to smash him.
by FlyingHigh » Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:03 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:FlyingHigh wrote:WI - day one @ Perth - 90 overs. 11 minutes overtime taken up with four delays for Ponting to receive Physio treatment, ie what the extra 1/2 hour was designed for. One challenge, three wickets.
AUS - day one @ Adelaide - 85 overs including 30 minutes overtime. 6 wickets, 3 (?) challenges.
How come the Windies can do it but we can't?
More overs of spin but still inexcusable, we should stop throwing the ball back to Haddin when it's hit to mid-on or covers, Pup is the worse offender.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:24 am
FlyingHigh wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:FlyingHigh wrote:WI - day one @ Perth - 90 overs. 11 minutes overtime taken up with four delays for Ponting to receive Physio treatment, ie what the extra 1/2 hour was designed for. One challenge, three wickets.
AUS - day one @ Adelaide - 85 overs including 30 minutes overtime. 6 wickets, 3 (?) challenges.
How come the Windies can do it but we can't?
More overs of spin but still inexcusable, we should stop throwing the ball back to Haddin when it's hit to mid-on or covers, Pup is the worse offender.
True, but that is something that seems to have crept into the game over the last 20 years. I suppose it's all to do with team disciplines? Or designed to help the quick bowlers recover? Probably a fairly minor thing, but still wasting time.
by Pottsy » Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:45 am
SJABC wrote:Bum Crack wrote:Is it just me, or do other people think Justin Langer is a terrible commentator?? Everytime I hear his voice, I just want to smash him.
Sounds like he's talking while holding his nose whilst dunking his head into a bucket of water....
by silicone skyline » Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:47 am
by mal » Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:53 am
by Pottsy » Thu Dec 17, 2009 11:27 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:It certainly has, I think it has a direct relation to the slow over rates, even the Windies in the 80's with 4 quicks bowling all day were able to meet the deadline.
by Lightning McQueen » Thu Dec 17, 2009 11:43 am
Pottsy wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:It certainly has, I think it has a direct relation to the slow over rates, even the Windies in the 80's with 4 quicks bowling all day were able to meet the deadline.
I'm pretty sure I remember Ian Chappell talking about the abysmal over rates by the windies of the 70s and 80s. He was saying that it was a major part of the difficulty in playing them, as they didn't bowl enough overs for a big score to be able to happen even on those rare occasions where they were on top of the bowling attack. Talking about over rates of under 80 a day at times IIRC.
I've had a quick scour around, but can't find any stats to back up my memory. Anyone know?
by Rik E Boy » Thu Dec 17, 2009 11:57 am
Dutchy wrote:2 tons in 25 digs...outstanding?
by FlyingHigh » Thu Dec 17, 2009 12:02 pm
Lightning McQueen wrote:Pottsy wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:It certainly has, I think it has a direct relation to the slow over rates, even the Windies in the 80's with 4 quicks bowling all day were able to meet the deadline.
I'm pretty sure I remember Ian Chappell talking about the abysmal over rates by the windies of the 70s and 80s. He was saying that it was a major part of the difficulty in playing them, as they didn't bowl enough overs for a big score to be able to happen even on those rare occasions where they were on top of the bowling attack. Talking about over rates of under 80 a day at times IIRC.
I've had a quick scour around, but can't find any stats to back up my memory. Anyone know?
I do recall them having to chuck Gomes and Viv on during one-dayers to speed it up, probably not the best example.
by Swamp Donkey » Thu Dec 17, 2009 12:03 pm
Dutchy wrote:Stumps wrote:Dutchy wrote:2 tons in 25 digs...outstanding?
rephrase to very good.runs dont lie and hes made plenty of them of late. i think you made a big comment early about him and your trying to justify it dutchy
Never said he couldnt bat or make runs, its turning them into big scores to help your country out....stats dont lie...this bloke gets so many starts but continues to fail to make it count and hurt teams...
by westcoastpanther » Thu Dec 17, 2009 12:10 pm
by FlyingHigh » Thu Dec 17, 2009 12:11 pm
mal wrote:I wonder who will open the bowling this morning
SARWAN + GAYLE
No doubt if that was the case SARWAN would be bowling into the wind
Fair dinkum
Will ROACH bowl with the wind today ?
by Booney » Thu Dec 17, 2009 12:11 pm
Dutchy wrote:...this bloke gets so many starts ...
by The Jack » Thu Dec 17, 2009 1:13 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |