SA Footy

Markrams mrs had a ‘Sharon Stone’ moment!

carey wrote:Markrams mrs had a ‘Sharon Stone’ moment!

The biggest travesty of this ball tampering saga is the cameramen forgetting what their job entails in South Africa:)

SA 2/203. No real penetration from our bowlers. It's been a long day!

4/268

Cummins again has 3 wickets, has bowled beautifully on this tour

How much is Shane Warne getting paid by "Dukes" to continually bag the shit out of Kookaburra balls and tell everyone how the Dukes ball is the best in the world?
Just STFD of hearing the same whinge over and over again FFS

Sayers with his 1st getting AB who immediately reviewed the caught behind decision.
DRS showed a clear edge so not sure what AB was thinking?
Well done to the Idiot commentators bagging the shit out of Paine for giving the 2nd new ball to Sayers instead of Cummins

And immediately a 2nd for Chad getting Rabada 2nd ball !!!!!

6/299

Sayers bowled well on a pitch that offered very little. 2/64 from 26 overs was solid, be did his bit. Bowled good lines and removed AB. Solid first day from him.

Faf should stick to ball tampering because he can’t bat!
That was a terrible dismissal for a top order batter

Jim05 wrote:Faf should stick to ball tampering because he can’t bat!
That was a terrible dismissal for a top order batter

Fair to say he hasnt set the world on fire this series with the bat

Nice to see sayers do well. He might not be fast but hes consistently testing you just like philander. Maybe warney might stop bagging him after taking a couple of wickets.

batmanbegins wrote:Nice to see sayers do well. He might not be fast but hes consistently testing you just like philander. Maybe warney might stop bagging him after taking a couple of wickets.

Honestly he bowled good lines. The pitch offered very little as Hazelwood struggled out there as well. Sayers just kept hitting the lines and eventually it paid off.

Early on he created a few chances so wasnt too bad. As I said 2/64 from 26 on debut under the circumstances isnt bad at all. Kept it tight and has a few wickets including the big ome of AB.

stan wrote:

batmanbegins wrote:Nice to see sayers do well. He might not be fast but hes consistently testing you just like philander. Maybe warney might stop bagging him after taking a couple of wickets.

Honestly he bowled good lines. The pitch offered very little as Hazelwood struggled out there as well. Sayers just kept hitting the lines and eventually it paid off.

Early on he created a few chances so wasnt too bad. As I said 2/64 from 26 on debut under the circumstances isnt bad at all. Kept it tight and has a few wickets including the big ome of AB.

Have to agree thought he bowled very well a majority of the time.

As for Warne, he was a pain last night, complaining about everything from the balls to Sayers repeatedly

The Toad's press conference is coming up in the next hour or so, I hope whoever wrote it for him used lots of small words.

Grenville wrote:The Toad's press conference is coming up in the next hour or so, I hope whoever wrote it for him used lots of small words.

More people new about this than just the 3 he ain't giving anyone up.

Piss weak presso Warner.

Grenville wrote:The Toad's press conference is coming up in the next hour or so, I hope whoever wrote it for him used lots of small words.

And pictures. Lots of pictures.

Ring leader = warner
And smith is weak for not stopping it and going along with it.

Wedgie wrote:Piss weak presso Warner.

And that is being kind.

Personally can't stand Warner but clearly we haven't been given the full,true and correct story on this.

Also anyone who verbal abuses a family member of these 3 needs there head checked....disgraceful

Wedgie wrote:Piss weak presso Warner.

Obviously a prepared speech written by a legal representative.

He continually referred to my actions but not one journalist asked, what were those actions