Page 74 of 153

Re: Ashes 2023

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 1:38 am
by DOC
mickey wrote:Have the rules changed and bowled is no longer a valid dismissal??

Sent from my SM-G781B using Tapatalk


Yep. Include LBW as well.

Win, lose or draw, we need to learn a lot about better bowling tactics.

Re: Ashes 2023

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 1:40 am
by PatowalongaPirate
Dick in your arse England.

Re: Ashes 2023

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 1:40 am
by RB
What's Ronald doing with the walkie talkie?

And as I write that England are over and out.

Re: Ashes 2023

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 1:41 am
by DOC
SAME OLD AUSSIES
ALWAYS WINNING

Re: Ashes 2023

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 1:41 am
by Jim05
I’m sure England will claim they are the real winners here just like they were in the first test.
And to think these clowns were making fun of our lower order when they have 4 genuine number 11’s

Re: Ashes 2023

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 1:41 am
by am Bays
Finally we put one on the stumps

Re: Ashes 2023

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 1:41 am
by spell_check
And three no.11s gone

Re: Ashes 2023

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 1:42 am
by DOC
knock a couple over as you go through the members

Re: Ashes 2023

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 1:44 am
by Senor Moto Gadili
Aussies were a bit like a cat playing with a moise. Just wanted to rough up the tail a bit. Good win.

Re: Ashes 2023

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 1:54 am
by Jim05
Usman not holding back

Re: Ashes 2023

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 2:00 am
by DOC
MOTM Steve Smith. Surprising.

Re: Ashes 2023

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 2:00 am
by Jim05
Smith MOTM
That should wind the crowd up even more

Re: Ashes 2023

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 2:14 am
by DOC
The iCC taking the absolute piss with the umpiring appointments.

The next three tests will see a rotation of Joel Wilson (not even first class standard), Niton Menin Ok and Kumar Dharmasena. There will be numerous reviews.

We deserve the best umpires. Gaffney and Raza terribly inconsistent on the wides called today and not called yesterday.

Gaffney is simply not up to it. He is the same standard as Wilson.

Raza like Erasmus is just too unfit to concentrate for five days.

Re: Ashes 2023

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 2:17 am
by LaughingKookaburra
Great innings by Stokes, however his decision to send us in and let us pile on over 400 has clearly cost England the game.

Re: Ashes 2023

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 8:25 am
by gazzamagoo
whufc wrote:
Jim05 wrote:Usman wasn’t happy at a couple of the old cronies in the long room and looked like he wanted to belt one. Wonder what was said


Yeah noticed that…hopefully it was in regards to the bairstow dismissal and not anything more personal or upsetting.


Probably told him to choke on a ham sanga.

Re: Ashes 2023

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 8:50 am
by Jim05
gazzamagoo wrote:
whufc wrote:
Jim05 wrote:Usman wasn’t happy at a couple of the old cronies in the long room and looked like he wanted to belt one. Wonder what was said


Yeah noticed that…hopefully it was in regards to the bairstow dismissal and not anything more personal or upsetting.


Probably told him to choke on a ham sanga.
The English use the term “Paki” in everyday talk and don’t think there is anything wrong with it.
I’d say they probably threw that at him

Re: Ashes 2023

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 8:53 am
by Jim05
IMG_3451.jpeg
IMG_3451.jpeg (15.97 KiB) Viewed 2248 times

Re: Ashes 2023

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 9:44 am
by mighty_tiger_79
The catch was rightly called Not Out
That decision of Bairstow should have been withdrawn before being adjudicated on. He wasn't gaining an advantage, trying to take a run etc. That situation would happen at the end of nearly every over.
Now the game gets slower as batsman wait for the call of Over.

Re: Ashes 2023

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 9:47 am
by Kahuna
For anyone who can be bothered searching, it has just been mentioned on the radio that Bairstow tried a similar stumping dismissal on Labushagne day 4 when he was 7. Hypocrite, thy name is Johnny.

Re: Ashes 2023

PostPosted: Mon Jul 03, 2023 9:50 am
by Booney
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:The catch was rightly called Not Out
That decision of Bairstow should have been withdrawn before being adjudicated on. He wasn't gaining an advantage, trying to take a run etc. That situation would happen at the end of nearly every over.
Now the game gets slower as batsman wait for the call of Over.


Image