pafc1870 wrote:Adelaide Hawk wrote:locky801 wrote:Hawk it was clearly off the glove in the slow Mo replay
Clearly? How can you say that?

Maybe when you call an optometrist for Katich, you can call one for yourself too

Gee, another smart arse who never gets anything wrong.
Come on guys, that decision was no more "clear" than the Hauritz run out earlier in the day. I certainly don't think it was clear enough to reverse the umpire's decision under the current referral system rules. We all know it probably hit the gloves, but did we see it? The answer is NO. The same as Hauritz's run out. We all knew it was probably out, but the evidence was inconclusive frame by frame.
As for Katich, he was a metre from the bat and it was hit into the ground, surely he would have seen that from where he was. Nothing wrong with my eyes, I just know the difference between what I actually did see, what I think I saw, what others tell me happened, and what I assumed happened.