Footy Smart wrote:NFC wrote:Moffat sucks, anyone else we got?
Plant, Smith, Moffat, next please.
Your and Idiot!
I will second that, give the bloke a chance, nice lad Mof.
by Bulls forever » Thu Dec 09, 2010 5:50 pm
Footy Smart wrote:NFC wrote:Moffat sucks, anyone else we got?
Plant, Smith, Moffat, next please.
Your and Idiot!
by Bulls forever » Thu Dec 09, 2010 5:51 pm
mal wrote:valleys07 wrote:Bit harsh on moffat for the lads first game.....if we can persist with harris/smith for however many failures we can at least give him 3-4 matches to prove his worth/gain him some experience....besides its not like we have openers cracking ton after ton in the domestic comp...
Agree, every rookie cricketer should be judged after 5-6 games , not on one game
I made 4 in my first game, and ended up one of the greatest self proclaimed cricketers Ive seen in a mirror
by Bulls forever » Thu Dec 09, 2010 5:53 pm
mal wrote:NFC good comaparism
Heres some comparisms of my own
COOPER = MARK WAUGH
FERGUSON = D HUSSEY
COOPER and THE FERG , can you think of anything more graceful than to see these 2 guys in full fight
Lets hope today is the day, otherwise REB will be unbearable
SA 2/44
COOPER 19*
THE FERG 1 *
COPELAND 1/13
CAMERON 0/15
CLARK 1/5
THE NATH 0/10
I think SA are in strife
by mal » Thu Dec 09, 2010 6:27 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Thu Dec 09, 2010 6:50 pm
by NFC » Thu Dec 09, 2010 7:09 pm
by Bulls forever » Thu Dec 09, 2010 8:03 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:I've seen a bit of Moffat. He has a good temperament, sound technique and is well organised at the crease. The only thing that concerns me is he has limited shot range, and in 1st class cricket you need to make the shot more than you do in grade cricket. I'm prepared to give him a go.
by mal » Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:36 am
by Lightning McQueen » Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:39 am
mal wrote:SA 4/206
FERG 70* [160]
THE DAN 55*[135]
These 2 multi talented players have so far made 104 partnership, and might be substantially more
The 2nd new ball is the key
Just like in Hobart, this team refuses to give in, a draw or freakish win out of this would be a great result
SMITH 2/67, looks like these 2 are feasting on him b4 the 2nd new egg
by cripple » Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:42 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:mal wrote:SA 4/206
FERG 70* [160]
THE DAN 55*[135]
These 2 multi talented players have so far made 104 partnership, and might be substantially more
The 2nd new ball is the key
Just like in Hobart, this team refuses to give in, a draw or freakish win out of this would be a great result
SMITH 2/67, looks like these 2 are feasting on him b4 the 2nd new egg
Give me some mal.......please.
by smithy » Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:47 am
mal wrote:SA 4/206
FERG 70* [160]
THE DAN 55*[135]
These 2 multi talented players have so far made 104 partnership, and might be substantially more
The 2nd new ball is the key
Just like in Hobart, this team refuses to give in, a draw or freakish win out of this would be a great result
SMITH 2/67, looks like these 2 are feasting on him b4 the 2nd new egg
by Footy Smart » Fri Dec 10, 2010 11:53 am
smithy wrote:mal wrote:SA 4/206
FERG 70* [160]
THE DAN 55*[135]
These 2 multi talented players have so far made 104 partnership, and might be substantially more
The 2nd new ball is the key
Just like in Hobart, this team refuses to give in, a draw or freakish win out of this would be a great result
SMITH 2/67, looks like these 2 are feasting on him b4 the 2nd new egg
NM Hauritz 13.0 0 44 0 3.38 1st Innings
NM Hauritz 10.0 1 26 0 2.60 2nd Innings
No wickets and by the looks no faith from his captain with lack of overs bowled.
SPD Smith 12.5 2 57 4
SPD Smith 20.5 2 87 2
6 wickets @ 24 for the match so far.
by locky801 » Fri Dec 10, 2010 12:01 pm
by mal » Fri Dec 10, 2010 12:14 pm
by Footy Smart » Fri Dec 10, 2010 12:17 pm
Are the oppostion skippers underestimating the mighty South Aussies?
by Jim05 » Fri Dec 10, 2010 12:20 pm
mal wrote:SA 4/265
FERG 91*[198]
THE DAN 93* [171]
NS lead by 8 runs
This makes a mockery of the declaration now
Last game a follow on, this game a declaration
Are the oppostion skippers underestimating the mighty South Aussies?
by Jim05 » Fri Dec 10, 2010 12:21 pm
Footy Smart wrote:Are the oppostion skippers underestimating the mighty South Aussies?
We lure them into a false sense of security, we really arent that bad
by Brodlach » Fri Dec 10, 2010 12:24 pm
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Brodlach » Fri Dec 10, 2010 12:25 pm
Jim05 wrote:mal wrote:SA 4/265
FERG 91*[198]
THE DAN 93* [171]
NS lead by 8 runs
This makes a mockery of the declaration now
Last game a follow on, this game a declaration
Are the oppostion skippers underestimating the mighty South Aussies?
Dont get too cocky. We are a batsman short and if we lose a wicket soon the game will be over in a hour
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Mr Beefy » Fri Dec 10, 2010 12:27 pm
Brodlach wrote:Jim05 wrote:mal wrote:SA 4/265
FERG 91*[198]
THE DAN 93* [171]
NS lead by 8 runs
This makes a mockery of the declaration now
Last game a follow on, this game a declaration
Are the oppostion skippers underestimating the mighty South Aussies?
Dont get too cocky. We are a batsman short and if we lose a wicket soon the game will be over in a hour
Manou is next in
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |