by Push in the Back » Thu Jan 22, 2009 2:01 pm
by panther » Thu Jan 22, 2009 2:10 pm
by Dutchy » Thu Jan 22, 2009 2:18 pm
by wycbloods » Thu Jan 22, 2009 2:19 pm
by Booney » Thu Jan 22, 2009 2:30 pm
by Pup » Thu Jan 22, 2009 2:47 pm
Dutchy wrote:Pure Bullshit that they can bring in a player for the Grand Final
Im tipping this will backfire though and the Vics will tear them a new one
by Dutchy » Thu Jan 22, 2009 6:13 pm
Pup wrote:Dutchy wrote:Pure Bullshit that they can bring in a player for the Grand Final
Im tipping this will backfire though and the Vics will tear them a new one
I dont have a problem with what NSW have done, If it is in the rules why not utilise it..?
by Pup » Thu Jan 22, 2009 6:38 pm
by Dutchy » Thu Jan 22, 2009 6:40 pm
Pup wrote:I agree
But it is, so there is nothing wrong with it.
by smac » Fri Jan 23, 2009 9:28 am
by Footy Smart » Fri Jan 23, 2009 9:30 am
smac wrote:How is it different to Redbacks recruitment of Tanveer for the few games he was available? The fact it is a final is irrelevant, IMO. If it improves the cricket we see, then it's all good.
by brod » Fri Jan 23, 2009 9:43 am
Footy Smart wrote:smac wrote:How is it different to Redbacks recruitment of Tanveer for the few games he was available? The fact it is a final is irrelevant, IMO. If it improves the cricket we see, then it's all good.
I have particular problems with the player coming in just for the final.... Tanveer and Gull came and played lead up games and im sure if available and their state was in the final they would have played. But to boost your team for 1 game and leave a player out is p*ss weak.
by smac » Fri Jan 23, 2009 9:35 pm
by Dutchy » Fri Jan 23, 2009 9:42 pm
brod wrote:Footy Smart wrote:smac wrote:How is it different to Redbacks recruitment of Tanveer for the few games he was available? The fact it is a final is irrelevant, IMO. If it improves the cricket we see, then it's all good.
I have particular problems with the player coming in just for the final.... Tanveer and Gull came and played lead up games and im sure if available and their state was in the final they would have played. But to boost your team for 1 game and leave a player out is p*ss weak.
Spot on. These players are a part of the TEAM for the competition not just hired guns for the final
by wycbloods » Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:37 pm
by dinglinga » Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:04 am
by Punk Rooster » Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:13 pm
bayman wrote:interesting but if it's in the rules then so be it
it reminds me back to 1969 when royce hart played his 1 & only game for glenelg in the grand final.....it cost glenelg $4,000 but i wonder what it cost nsw to get him
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:11 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:Teeball. Who gives a s***t. They could get Ivan Milat for all I care.
regards,
REB
by Lightning McQueen » Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:13 pm
Dutchy wrote:Pure Bullshit that they can bring in a player for the Grand Final
Im tipping this will backfire though and the Vics will tear them a new one
by Gozu » Tue Jan 27, 2009 2:30 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |