by mal » Sun Jan 31, 2016 10:06 pm
by carey » Sun Jan 31, 2016 10:07 pm
mal wrote:Great over by Watto
5 off over 19
Bowled well all series, even before the dead rubber
by mal » Sun Jan 31, 2016 10:12 pm
by bennymacca » Sun Jan 31, 2016 10:13 pm
by Q. » Sun Jan 31, 2016 10:13 pm
by Spargo » Sun Jan 31, 2016 10:14 pm
Q. wrote:Possibly the worst last over I've seen anyone bowl.
by bennymacca » Sun Jan 31, 2016 10:16 pm
Q. wrote:Possibly the worst last over I've seen anyone bowl.
by Eagles2014 » Sun Jan 31, 2016 10:21 pm
Spargo wrote:Q. wrote:Possibly the worst last over I've seen anyone bowl.
No argument here.
by bennymacca » Sun Jan 31, 2016 10:22 pm
Eagles2014 wrote:Spargo wrote:Q. wrote:Possibly the worst last over I've seen anyone bowl.
No argument here.
Few blokes who were excellent in Big Bash have been showed up at the next level.
Makes picking the final team of 15 very interesting.
Tait probably gone, Tye and Boland be nervous, Lyon unlikely, even Lynn against spin a worry, not sure about Head.
Lots of interesting decisions ahead!
by daysofourlives » Sun Jan 31, 2016 10:25 pm
Eagles2014 wrote:Spargo wrote:Q. wrote:Possibly the worst last over I've seen anyone bowl.
No argument here.
Few blokes who were excellent in Big Bash have been showed up at the next level.
Makes picking the final team of 15 very interesting.
Tait probably gone, Tye and Boland be nervous, Lyon unlikely, even Lynn against spin a worry, not sure about Head.
Lots of interesting decisions ahead!
by carey » Sun Jan 31, 2016 10:29 pm
daysofourlives wrote:Eagles2014 wrote:Spargo wrote:Q. wrote:Possibly the worst last over I've seen anyone bowl.
No argument here.
Few blokes who were excellent in Big Bash have been showed up at the next level.
Makes picking the final team of 15 very interesting.
Tait probably gone, Tye and Boland be nervous, Lyon unlikely, even Lynn against spin a worry, not sure about Head.
Lots of interesting decisions ahead!
Yep just shows how much weaker the BBL is for having 8 teams in it
by carey » Sun Jan 31, 2016 10:30 pm
by daysofourlives » Sun Jan 31, 2016 10:38 pm
carey wrote:Or maybe the
Adelaide Red Cans
by mal » Sun Jan 31, 2016 11:02 pm
Spargo wrote:mal wrote:mal wrote:Shane Watson is one of the most destructive opening batting short form batters in the universe
Should be opening , not getting embarrassed by spin in the middle order
Shaun Marsh 23 off 23 balls is not the answer up the top
Making runs in a dead rubber, when it doesn't matter - AGAIN!
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Feb 01, 2016 9:00 am
by Booney » Mon Feb 01, 2016 9:34 am
by helicopterking » Mon Feb 01, 2016 10:02 am
Lightning McQueen wrote:I think we're missing the real issue here, India has a population of 1.3 billion compared to our 24 million, they sent over a team that is better at T20 than ours.
We had no Starc which IMO weakens our bowling attack considerably with not only him not being there, the pressure it releases from the other end too.
We need a keeper that can bat at a quick rate and I really think Behrendorf should be considered, Dan Christian was one of the in-form allrounders during the BBL so if they were going to roll the dice on bringing a couple of hasbeens back in, he probably should've been in the mix.
I think more good than harm will come out of this series, hopefully the selectors can acknowledge their flaws.
by Booney » Mon Feb 01, 2016 10:12 am
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Feb 01, 2016 12:26 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Feb 01, 2016 12:33 pm
helicopterking wrote:
Behrendorff has been diagnosed with stress fractures in his back again.
Wouldn't hurt to find some bowlers who swing the ball. That's why we failed to get through their top order. Raw speed plays very little part in T20 cricket, especially when you are such flat decks, it just makes batting easier as it hits the bat harder.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |