4th Ashes Test : MCG

[spell_check]

Why the bloody hell give it out for first?

[mighty_tiger_79]

nothing wrong with that last referral

[mal]

Why the bloody hell give it out for first?

So if Trott hits a six
Will the umpire call for a review on a no ball
what a load of crabbshit

[mighty_tiger_79]

dont like it dont watch it

[mal]

nothing wrong with that last referral

Frogcrap
360 balls a day usually bowled in Test Cricket
To single out 1 f...g ball is a f....g disgrace
Its all or nothing

[fish]

Why the bloody hell give it out for first?

So if Trott hits a six
Will the umpire call for a review on a no ball

Probably not...

[fish]

The ball was an illegal delivery - not out. Play on.

[mal]

The ball was an illegal delivery - not out. Play on.

Its not the point

YES IT IS AN ILLEGAL DELIVERY
But why dont they reveiw every ball thats bowled in this test match
Why only review the balls where wickets are refered, or as in this case the Umpire referred it

Raffertys rules

[Phantom Gossiper]

Well done to Aleem Dar for having the testicular fortitude to think he may have missed it and look at it. Im sure if he had let it go, he would cop more abuse for missing it etc.

Here's a question, do you think he would have reviewed it if Ponting and co hadn't been all in his face this morning over the Pieterson incident?

[am Bays]

The ball was an illegal delivery - not out. Play on.

Agreed

[mighty_tiger_79]

Well done to Aleem Dar for having the testicular fortitude to think he may have missed it and look at it. Im sure if he had let it go, he would cop more abuse for missing it etc.

Here's a question, do you think he would have reviewed it if Ponting and co hadn't been all in his face this morning over the Pieterson incident?

probably not

[mal]

QUESTION
Would Dar have called for a review if Trott didnt snick the ball ?
Im almost absolutely sure he would not have

[am Bays]

Well done to Aleem Dar for having the testicular fortitude to think he may have missed it and look at it. Im sure if he had let it go, he would cop more abuse for missing it etc.

Here's a question, do you think he would have reviewed it if Ponting and co hadn't been all in his face this morning over the Pieterson incident?

would've reviewed it regardless IMO, test umpires don't let that influence their decision making process, especially the good'uns like Dar.

[mighty_tiger_79]

would he have been dropped for missing a clear no-ball?

[Adelaide Hawk]

QUESTION
Would Dar have called for a review if Trott didnt snick the ball ?
Im almost absolutely sure he would not have

And also, if it wasn't a no ball, does that mean Dar had only 1 referal remaining?

What a farce. Get rid of it.

[locky801]

Now 5/328

lead 230

[locky801]

shock horror Clarke into the attack

[Jim05]

Said it a million times hilfy is rubbish.

[spell_check]

We didn't find out for a couple of years that the ball that dismissed Shane Beer at the WACA was a no-ball - these checks have only come into vogue this year. I wonder how many dismissals have been wrongfully given over the years that you could find out in the archives of the Chanel 9 library?

[Phantom Gossiper]

We didn't find out for a couple of years that the ball that dismissed Shane Beer at the WACA was a no-ball - these checks have only come into vogue this year. I wonder how many dismissals have been wrongfully given over the years that you could find out in the archives of the Chanel 9 library?

Shane Warne v NZ on 99