westozfalcon wrote:I'm not surprised that Tendulkar was annoyed after being fired on that LBW.
It was a poor decision which crushed any hopes India had of making a fightback in the match.
why was it a poor decision?
by RustyCage » Sat Jan 14, 2012 11:08 pm
westozfalcon wrote:I'm not surprised that Tendulkar was annoyed after being fired on that LBW.
It was a poor decision which crushed any hopes India had of making a fightback in the match.
by Yardy Lard » Sat Jan 14, 2012 11:08 pm
westozfalcon wrote:I'm not surprised that Tendulkar was annoyed after being fired on that LBW.
It was a poor decision which crushed any hopes India had of making a fightback in the match.
by Jim05 » Sat Jan 14, 2012 11:10 pm
westozfalcon wrote:I'm not surprised that Tendulkar was annoyed after being fired on that LBW.
It was a poor decision which crushed any hopes India had of making a fightback in the match.
by Jim05 » Sat Jan 14, 2012 11:14 pm
Yardy Lard wrote:westozfalcon wrote:I'm not surprised that Tendulkar was annoyed after being fired on that LBW.
It was a poor decision which crushed any hopes India had of making a fightback in the match.
How was it a poor decision? - even when using DRS, he would have been given out.
He is only unhappy about being given out LBW, as in the last 23 years he has played Test Cricket, it would be inconceivable that he given out LBW by either Indian umpires, or when playing in India under neutral umpires.
by Rik E Boy » Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:02 am
am Bays wrote:rod_rooster wrote:I reckon Marsh is the only Australian hoping India fight it out and build a lead tomorrow. If he doesn't get another innings his spot is surely gone. If he gets picked again what message is that sending to blokes who actually perform at first class level?
Who's currently performing at first class level demanding to be picked??? That is a problem we have at the moment, whilst we are travelling allright bowling stocks wise we have no depth in the batting.
by Rik E Boy » Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:04 am
westozfalcon wrote:I'm not surprised that Tendulkar was annoyed after being fired on that LBW.
It was a poor decision which crushed any hopes India had of making a fightback in the match.
by The Sleeping Giant » Sun Jan 15, 2012 2:48 am
westozfalcon wrote:I'm not surprised that Tendulkar was annoyed after being fired on that LBW.
It was a poor decision which crushed any hopes India had of making a fightback in the match.
by locky801 » Sun Jan 15, 2012 4:29 am
Rik E Boy wrote:westozfalcon wrote:I'm not surprised that Tendulkar was annoyed after being fired on that LBW.
It was a poor decision which crushed any hopes India had of making a fightback in the match.
Nothing wrong with that decision. DRS would have confirmed the umpires call. He tossed the toys out of the cot and lost a lot of respect in the process.
regards,
REB
by Jimmy » Sun Jan 15, 2012 6:19 am
by stan » Sun Jan 15, 2012 8:08 am
Jimmy wrote:Tendulkars reaction was pathetic. What a sook!
by Squids » Sun Jan 15, 2012 10:25 am
by mal » Sun Jan 15, 2012 10:46 am
by rod_rooster » Sun Jan 15, 2012 11:26 am
Rik E Boy wrote:am Bays wrote:rod_rooster wrote:I reckon Marsh is the only Australian hoping India fight it out and build a lead tomorrow. If he doesn't get another innings his spot is surely gone. If he gets picked again what message is that sending to blokes who actually perform at first class level?
Who's currently performing at first class level demanding to be picked??? That is a problem we have at the moment, whilst we are travelling allright bowling stocks wise we have no depth in the batting.
The question should be who at first class level has scored more than 14 runs in four knocks...
the line begins here.
regards,
REB
by mal » Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:41 pm
by locky801 » Sun Jan 15, 2012 1:23 pm
by westozfalcon » Sun Jan 15, 2012 1:59 pm
Yardy Lard wrote:westozfalcon wrote:I'm not surprised that Tendulkar was annoyed after being fired on that LBW.
It was a poor decision which crushed any hopes India had of making a fightback in the match.
How was it a poor decision? - even when using DRS, he would have been given out.
.
by locky801 » Sun Jan 15, 2012 2:01 pm
by rod_rooster » Sun Jan 15, 2012 2:17 pm
mal wrote:Shaun Marsh
Verdict
Deserves a few more opportunities given the ample chances some of team mates have had in this team when they struggled
by locky801 » Sun Jan 15, 2012 2:20 pm
by rod_rooster » Sun Jan 15, 2012 2:21 pm
westozfalcon wrote:Yardy Lard wrote:westozfalcon wrote:I'm not surprised that Tendulkar was annoyed after being fired on that LBW.
It was a poor decision which crushed any hopes India had of making a fightback in the match.
How was it a poor decision? - even when using DRS, he would have been given out.
.
I feel that it was a poor decision because from where the umpire stood he must surely have considered that the ball was going to miss leg stump.
In the absence of DRS, the overriding principle has always been that the batsman gets the benefit of the doubt and there should have been enough doubt for the umpire to keep the finger down.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |