SA Footy

SA 0/0 after 9 balls then 5 fours off next 8 balls

0/23 off 4 overs

2/24

Ludes gone for 13. Raphael gone 2nd ball for 0

2/24 now, Head and Ferguson in
Ludeman 13
Raphael 0 why is he in the team, why is he at 3 in a one day team, isnt he just a plodder more suited to shield cricket?
No Lehman who made progress at the end of last year

Zampa at 7, Ross at 6, pretty thin batting line up when you consider Ludeman is opening.

Brodlach wrote:Tiny oval so I reckon we will get them

This isnt a SS game, we dont have 2 innings to make them

daysofourlives wrote:2/24 now, Head and Ferguson in
Ludeman 13
Raphael 0 why is he in the team, why is he at 3 in a one day team, isnt he just a plodder more suited to shield cricket?
No Lehman who made progress at the end of last year

Zampa at 7, Ross at 6, pretty thin batting line up when you consider Ludeman is opening.

Couldnt agree more.
Terribly balance side.
I dont have the answers but nothing seems to be changing. How the hell does a piss ant state like Tasmania have 10 times the success as SA ?

OK Here we go, the only 2 decent batsmen in the team, Head and Ferg to put on a 300 stand to take SA to victory

2/60, current partnership 36 of which ferg has contributed 1

Shambles comp. NSW opening game vs the Kids at North Sydney oval

50 to trav, 2/66

NSW 3/338

Maddison 108 (120)
Smith 143 (122)

CA XI 3/10

Hopefully head gets his second one day ton

jackpot jim wrote:SA 0/0 after 9 balls then 5 fours off next 8 balls

0/23 off 4 overs

RustyCage wrote:2/24

Ludes gone for 13. Raphael gone 2nd ball for 0

has there ever been a better summation of the last two decades of SA cricket than these two posts?

daysofourlives wrote:2/24 now, Head and Ferguson in
Ludeman 13
Raphael 0 why is he in the team, why is he at 3 in a one day team, isnt he just a plodder more suited to shield cricket?
No Lehman who made progress at the end of last year

Zampa at 7, Ross at 6, pretty thin batting line up when you consider Ludeman is opening.

Get a ******* clue.....

Raphael is one of the better limited overs players in club cricket and did ok in the trial games so why not pick him?

heater31 wrote:

daysofourlives wrote:2/24 now, Head and Ferguson in
Ludeman 13
Raphael 0 why is he in the team, why is he at 3 in a one day team, isnt he just a plodder more suited to shield cricket?
No Lehman who made progress at the end of last year

Zampa at 7, Ross at 6, pretty thin batting line up when you consider Ludeman is opening.

Get a ******* clue.....

Raphael is one of the better limited overs players in club cricket and did ok in the trial games so why not pick him?

Thats why there was a question mark at the end of the sentence. Learn how to read ****!!
Club cricket is shit, thats no guide. No surprise you defended him but the proof is in the pudding

CXI 5/17

RustyCage wrote:CXI 5/17

What a great innovation, they'll beat the redbacks though

daysofourlives wrote:

heater31 wrote:Get a ******* clue.....

Raphael is one of the better limited overs players in club cricket and did ok in the trial games so why not pick him?

Thats why there was a question mark at the end of the sentence. Learn how to read ****!!
Club cricket is shit, thats no guide. No surprise you defended him but the proof is in the pudding

Raphael has proven to be a very capable cricketer at club and futures, but has obviously struggled a bit to find his feet at first class level.

Club cricket may be shit, but along with futures & PL it's the only guide we have to select blokes, so not really sure what you're on about?

RustyCage wrote:CXI 5/17

I have my doubts they've picked the best squad possible though for this group

If Head and Ferguson can bat most of this innings, I still think the Redbacks are a decent sniff to chase this total down.

Ferg has been in exceptional form as well in the PL, hopefully that continues today!

Zartan wrote:

daysofourlives wrote:

heater31 wrote:Get a ******* clue.....

Raphael is one of the better limited overs players in club cricket and did ok in the trial games so why not pick him?

Thats why there was a question mark at the end of the sentence. Learn how to read ****!!
Club cricket is shit, thats no guide. No surprise you defended him but the proof is in the pudding

Raphael has proven to be a very capable cricketer at club and futures, but has obviously struggled a bit to find his feet at first class level.

Club cricket may be shit, but along with futures & PL it's the only guide we have to select blokes, so not really sure what you're on about?

Better standard and guide than county cricket obviously