by Rik E Boy » Sat Oct 05, 2013 12:00 am
am Bays wrote:SA beaten by NT yesterday.
virtually a full strength SA side (Klinger, Head, Ferguson, Ludeman, Putland, Botha, Richardson, Zampa, Sayers) made 234 off their 50 overs. had NT 5/43 after 17 but lost by 3 wickets with six overs to spare.
Sack Chuck FFS!
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Oct 09, 2013 11:53 pm
by Coach Bombay » Sat Oct 12, 2013 5:43 pm
by stampy » Wed Oct 23, 2013 12:58 pm
by scoob » Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:31 pm
by Booney » Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:46 pm
scoob wrote:FFS.. Think we can discuss for real now... another year yet another pathetic performance... FFS!!!!
by heater31 » Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:49 pm
Booney wrote:scoob wrote:FFS.. Think we can discuss for real now... another year yet another pathetic performance... FFS!!!!
3 of the top 4 get past 20, the other past 50. In my book, they're set.
Please explain how this is Chucks fault?
by scoob » Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:55 pm
Booney wrote:scoob wrote:FFS.. Think we can discuss for real now... another year yet another pathetic performance... FFS!!!!
3 of the top 4 get past 20, the other past 50. In my book, they're set.
Please explain how this is Chucks fault?
by heater31 » Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:58 pm
scoob wrote:Booney wrote:scoob wrote:FFS.. Think we can discuss for real now... another year yet another pathetic performance... FFS!!!!
3 of the top 4 get past 20, the other past 50. In my book, they're set.
Please explain how this is Chucks fault?
So the coach holds no responsibilty of how his team is performing? Sounds like the worlds best coaching job!!!! He will be employed for life if he survives these repeat performances.
WTF - how can people defend his record and say its none of his fault.
by whufc » Wed Nov 06, 2013 5:01 pm
by scoob » Wed Nov 06, 2013 5:02 pm
heater31 wrote:scoob wrote:Booney wrote:scoob wrote:FFS.. Think we can discuss for real now... another year yet another pathetic performance... FFS!!!!
3 of the top 4 get past 20, the other past 50. In my book, they're set.
Please explain how this is Chucks fault?
So the coach holds no responsibilty of how his team is performing? Sounds like the worlds best coaching job!!!! He will be employed for life if he survives these repeat performances.
WTF - how can people defend his record and say its none of his fault.
Would have thought the coach is responsible for technique and tactical advice. Not mental application that is a player responsibility. If a player is mentally weak what can the coach do about it other than rant and rave that he is piss weak....
by Jim05 » Wed Nov 06, 2013 5:23 pm
whufc wrote:Umm not play him, not re sign his contract
by whufc » Wed Nov 06, 2013 5:32 pm
by dedja » Wed Nov 06, 2013 7:12 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |