SA Footy • View topic - SA v WA 18/12-21/12

by **Pup** » Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:53 pm

Mal's man dropped a regulation chance from Klinger on 0.

While his batting has been much improved this year his keeping is still a major let down which is his most important role in this side.

by **bloods08** » Sat Dec 19, 2009 5:15 pm

3/117 (54). Borgas 2no Klinger 42no

by **locky801** » Sat Dec 19, 2009 5:18 pm

SA batting terribly slowly :roll:

by **Adelaide Hawk** » Sat Dec 19, 2009 5:29 pm

bloods08 wrote:3/99 Cosgrove threw his innings away

Really? That doesn't sound like Cosgrove at all.

by **bloods08** » Sat Dec 19, 2009 5:39 pm

4/139. Borgas out for 14. Klinger 52no.

by **locky801** » Sat Dec 19, 2009 5:44 pm

Klinger 53 off of 160 balls :roll:

by **bloods08** » Sat Dec 19, 2009 5:50 pm

locky801 wrote:Klinger 53 off of 160 balls

At least he is still out there. The longer he bats, the quicker he scores.

by **mighty_tiger_79** » Sat Dec 19, 2009 5:56 pm

looks like this game will just be for first innings points

by **mal** » Sat Dec 19, 2009 6:18 pm

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:looks like this game will just be for first innings points

good tactics by SA
score at 2 an over
use up time
make WA inevitably set us a toal of 371 off 88 overs day 4

RONCHI man of the match
0 RUNS
dropped Klinger on 0

Klinger has been dropped on 0 2 games in a row
And by Mals mates RONCHI and HODGEY
:roll:

Heard at the oval today
MANOU has requested the games start at 11-00 not 10-30
Request granted

by **Media Park** » Sat Dec 19, 2009 8:25 pm

Only 'Backs batsman that can bat for so long... D Harris notwithstanding...

by **spell_check** » Sat Dec 19, 2009 8:37 pm

Sounds like a regulation hangover after a big win at the MCG (mode of match does not matter, of course)

by **magpie in the 80's** » Sat Dec 19, 2009 9:56 pm

S.A. 4/167

Michael Klinger 64*
Graham Manou 13*

by **Adelaide Hawk** » Sun Dec 20, 2009 7:36 am

spell_check wrote:Sounds like a regulation hangover after a big win at the MCG (mode of match does not matter, of course)

I think it goes further than that Spelly, I said at the time that the loss to Victoria in the recent Shield game may have an adverse effect on the players in terms of confidence, and this may result in some disappointing perfromances. We lost more than 6 points in that match.

by **redandblack** » Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:33 am

AH, I think there's a fair chance that WA will declare its second innings in this game to set a target.

Declarations are part and parcel of these games now. The reward of 6 points instead of 2 is worth the risk.

by **mal** » Sun Dec 20, 2009 10:21 am

redandblack wrote:AH, I think there's a fair chance that WA will declare its second innings in this game to set a target.

Declarations are part and parcel of these games now. The reward of 6 points instead of 2 is worth the risk.

So true
Too often a dominating team does not have the playing time to mentally disintigrate its opposition

They might as well roll up on day 1
Look at the pitch
Devise a fair target
Agree to a target of say 389 off 90 overs
Then toss a coin to see who bats and bowls
All over in the day
3 days extra rest for the bowlers ...

by **Thiele** » Sun Dec 20, 2009 11:58 am

SA 5/202

MAnou out for 16

by **locky801** » Sun Dec 20, 2009 12:24 pm

SA 5/213

Klinger 92*
O'Brien 13*

by **locky801** » Sun Dec 20, 2009 12:39 pm

100 to Klinger

S.A. 5/229

Klinger 101*

O'Brien 20*

by **Adelaide Hawk** » Sun Dec 20, 2009 12:41 pm

redandblack wrote:AH, I think there's a fair chance that WA will declare its second innings in this game to set a target.

Declarations are part and parcel of these games now. The reward of 6 points instead of 2 is worth the risk.

Yep, but you can guarantee WA won't give a soft declaration like SA hands out. They'll give us something we'll have to work our rings off to get.

by **locky801** » Sun Dec 20, 2009 12:45 pm

6/233
O'Brien gone for 24

SA v WA 18/12-21/12

Re: SA v WA 18/12-21/12

Re: SA v WA 18/12-21/12

Re: SA v WA 18/12-21/12

Re: SA v WA 18/12-21/12

Re: SA v WA 18/12-21/12

Re: SA v WA 18/12-21/12

Re: SA v WA 18/12-21/12

Re: SA v WA 18/12-21/12

Re: SA v WA 18/12-21/12

Re: SA v WA 18/12-21/12

Re: SA v WA 18/12-21/12

Re: SA v WA 18/12-21/12

Re: SA v WA 18/12-21/12

Re: SA v WA 18/12-21/12

Re: SA v WA 18/12-21/12

Re: SA v WA 18/12-21/12

Re: SA v WA 18/12-21/12

Re: SA v WA 18/12-21/12

Re: SA v WA 18/12-21/12

Re: SA v WA 18/12-21/12

Who is online

Around the place

SA v WA 18/12-21/12

Around the place

Join us