Re: Aus v Ind Test Series
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 1:45 pm
Q. wrote:Ishant is a tossbag
Why's that Q?
Q. wrote:Ishant is a tossbag
Bombers4EVA wrote:Jim05 wrote:Bombers4EVA wrote:So my question is as ive already mentioned earlier. Who is in-line to take over from Haddin?
Hartley, Ludeman or my man Nevill.
They will go with that spud Wade though, shocking glovesman but can bat ok.
What type of wicket keeper would you prefer? One who is good with the gloves and bats at no 7. Or one that is average with the gloves and can bat? Its extremely rare to find a wicket keeper that can do both.
What's your opinion on Adam Gilchrist?
Bombers4EVA wrote:Q. wrote:Ishant is a tossbag
Why's that Q?
Jim05 wrote:Bombers4EVA wrote:Jim05 wrote:Bombers4EVA wrote:So my question is as ive already mentioned earlier. Who is in-line to take over from Haddin?
Hartley, Ludeman or my man Nevill.
They will go with that spud Wade though, shocking glovesman but can bat ok.
What type of wicket keeper would you prefer? One who is good with the gloves and bats at no 7. Or one that is average with the gloves and can bat? Its extremely rare to find a wicket keeper that can do both.
What's your opinion on Adam Gilchrist?
Gilchrist wasnt the best glovesman ever but he did a wonderful job especially to Warne. Gilly got better as time went on and became great.
Wade can bat but his glovework is horrendous, guaranteed a drop or missed catch every game. Worse against the spin. Warner would do a better job keeping than Wade.
Ive said for ages Nevill is the best keeper in the country and he has opened the bat for NSW in the shield, more than handy batter
Q. wrote:Bombers4EVA wrote:Q. wrote:Ishant is a tossbag
Why's that Q?
Giving Johnson shit after he got a couple past his bat. Mate, he's been carting you since he got to the crease.
Bombers4EVA wrote:How old is this Nevill bloke and how come Cricket Australia hasn't given him a opportunity yet?
Dogwatcher wrote:I cannot stand Sharma. He's a peaheart. Limping on day one of the first Test when his team needed him, fielding sub-standard and then charges down the wicket when his team needed him to at least attempt to bat out the evening (unlikely, but he could've at least had a crack). A soft, soft cricketer with all the tools in the world, but fails to choose to use them and, instead, acts like a tool.
Bombers4EVA wrote:Jim05 wrote:Bombers4EVA wrote:Jim05 wrote:[quote="Bombers4EVA"]So my question is as ive already mentioned earlier. Who is in-line to take over from Haddin?
Hartley, Ludeman or my man Nevill.
They will go with that spud Wade though, shocking glovesman but can bat ok.
What type of wicket keeper would you prefer? One who is good with the gloves and bats at no 7. Or one that is average with the gloves and can bat? Its extremely rare to find a wicket keeper that can do both.
What's your opinion on Adam Gilchrist?
Gilchrist wasnt the best glovesman ever but he did a wonderful job especially to Warne. Gilly got better as time went on and became great.
Wade can bat but his glovework is horrendous, guaranteed a drop or missed catch every game. Worse against the spin. Warner would do a better job keeping than Wade.
Ive said for ages Nevill is the best keeper in the country and he has opened the bat for NSW in the shield, more than handy batter
Bombers4EVA wrote:MJ is really having a good crack at it. When was his last ton? I think if he can get to 100 against India in our predicament earlier. It will be one of his greatest knocks.
bennymacca wrote:Bombers4EVA wrote:MJ is really having a good crack at it. When was his last ton? I think if he can get to 100 against India in our predicament earlier. It will be one of his greatest knocks.
Jinxed him
bennymacca wrote:Because he is probably the best bat out of the keepers and in the post Gilchrist era that is about as important.
I think with MJ in the team batting is of less importance.