SA Footy

SA superstar batsman Darren Boof Lehmann is according
to sources and confirmed in some posts on SAFOOTY
retiring from cricket in the o/d game v WA next Wednesday

A sad but inevitable day.
Boof is arguably in the top 3 left handed batsman ever produced in SA


MY TOP 3
----------

1 CLEM HILL
2 DAVID HOOKES
3 DARREN LEHMANN

3 great left handed batsman to represent the state

G SOBERS
would be the best lefty to ever bat for SA

BOOF = LEGEND

Surely you would have Matthew Minnegall in that list..

smithy wrote:Surely you would have Matthew Minnegall in that list..

Younis Ahmed....

mal wrote:

smithy wrote:Surely you would have Matthew Minnegall in that list..

Younis Ahmed....

Did he play for SA ?

YOUNIS AHMED
Yes was a Pakastani Test cricketer who performed ordinary in his stay in SA
About 30 years ago

Another 2 good leftys

KG CUNNINGHAM
WAYNE PHILLIPS

from the NSW game thread on 09/11/07 wrote:Looking at Boof on Wednesday night he looked to be in some serious discomfort from either back/Achilles and I don't think that they are telling us the full story.

Well they weren't telling us the full story but I didn't expect him to be told to pull the pin so soon.

Cricket in this state is now right royally screwed with out D.S Lehmann in the selected XI.

A extremely sad end to a fantastic career.

from the NSW game thread on 09/11/07 wrote:I'm tipping he will miss at least the next one also

sorry lads I can't get everything right

I rate Lehmann above Hookes.

That's a BIG call....

Not a real lot of difference in my opinion between Hookes and Lehmann both very brutal batsman when they got going, sad way for Boof to bow out, no doubt it appears as though he has been shown the gate

locky801 wrote:Not a real lot of difference in my opinion between Hookes and Lehmann both very brutal batsman when they got going, sad way for Boof to bow out, no doubt it appears as though he has been PUSHED

Hmmmm at first read ... that looked like an intended pun!

Dissident wrote:

locky801 wrote:Not a real lot of difference in my opinion between Hookes and Lehmann both very brutal batsman when they got going, sad way for Boof to bow out, no doubt it appears as though he has been PUSHED

Hmmmm at first read ... that looked like an intended pun!

whoops definately not a pun as usual wasnt thinking

GWW wrote:I rate Lehmann above Hookes.

I totally agree and well above at that .

redden whites wrote:

GWW wrote:I rate Lehmann above Hookes.

I totally agree and well above at that .

Yep, that makes at least three of us.

GWW wrote:I rate Lehmann above Hookes.

''Irate Lehmann above Hookes''.

I didnt think Boof was that angry or that close to Hookesy ....

rod_rooster wrote:

redden whites wrote:

GWW wrote:I rate Lehmann above Hookes.

I totally agree and well above at that .

Yep, that makes at least three of us.

Four

Lehmann was able to get it together at test level as well as dominating domestic bowling attacks

In his own words IIRC Hookesy said he 'just wasn't good enough' to make it at test level

Both great champions

HOOKES for me.
He could massacre good bowlers more often than Boof at the highest level.
At state level about even.

Is just my suspicious mind or does Boof's premptive injury retirement have anything to do with the new coach worried about senior player disharmony and Sorrell trying to keep one step ahead.

Thanks and Good Luck Boof, You are a dead set legend!!!

mal wrote:HOOKES for me.
He could massacre good bowlers more often than Boof at the highest level.
At state level about even.

Disagree there Mal, Lehmann did much better in a similar number of tests to Hookes.

http://content-aus.cricinfo.com/austral ... /6285.html

http://content-aus.cricinfo.com/austral ... /5696.html

The stats don't lie...

Hazbeen wrote:Is just my suspicious mind or does Boof's premptive injury retirement have anything to do with the new coach worried about senior player disharmony and Sorrell trying to keep one step ahead.

Thanks and Good Luck Boof, You are a dead set legend!!!

I doubt it. Verrrry good mates.

youngster wrote:

mal wrote:HOOKES for me.
He could massacre good bowlers more often than Boof at the highest level.
At state level about even.

Disagree there Mal, Lehmann did much better in a similar number of tests to Hookes.

http://content-aus.cricinfo.com/austral ... /6285.html

http://content-aus.cricinfo.com/austral ... /5696.html

The stats don't lie...

They do lie sometimes
Hookes played a lot of cricket against far far far superior bowlers at test level
At state level that is not applicable
Dont worry about Boofs ave compared to Hookseys its the opposition.