are the shield sides better than most test teams ?
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 6:41 pmseeing hussey averages about 88 in tests & about 41 in shield matches you'd have to say yes 
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 6:41 pmRe: are the shield sides better than most test teams ?
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 6:45 pmSurely this is a joke
Re: are the shield sides better than most test teams ?
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 7:05 pmI Wouldn't say better BUT NSW, QLD and WA at FULL Strength would match it with Most countries at Test Level and even the SA DUDbacks could upset Bangladesh especially if Dizzy played.
Re: are the shield sides better than most test teams ?
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 7:11 pmbayman wrote:seeing hussey averages about 88 in tests & about 41 in shield matches you'd have to say yes
its not a true representation of his career he has played over 195 first class games and only 17 test matches, so to come to the conclusion that sheild cricket is better than international cricket is outrageous
Re: are the shield sides better than most test teams ?
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:13 amjackpot jim wrote:I Wouldn't say better BUT NSW, QLD and WA at FULL Strength would match it with Most countries at Test Level and even the SA DUDbacks could upset Bangladesh especially if Dizzy played.
Piss off. Half the bangladesh team could walk into our top order! They'd probably make more runs!
Re: are the shield sides better than most test teams ?
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 8:35 amstan wrote:jackpot jim wrote:I Wouldn't say better BUT NSW, QLD and WA at FULL Strength would match it with Most countries at Test Level and even the SA DUDbacks could upset Bangladesh especially if Dizzy played.
Piss off. Half the bangladesh team could walk into our top order! They'd probably make more runs!
At the moment that would be right. do u know if the bangy keeper is any good the redbacks need a good one, and maybe we should send cosi over there for a year they all seem so skinny maybe he could lose so weight in bangladesh