Page 1 of 2

AU V NZ ADELAIDE OVAL 14/12/07 o/d game

PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 5:29 pm
by mal
Appears to be one sided but on a flatter track NZ can be competitive
In Ross Taylor and Jacob ORgasAM they have 2 wonderful later order hitters
Much depends on Lou Vincent to kick start thier innings.
Kyle Mills is a very underated bowler.

Watched the Kiwis all day today, fielding drills and then the nets.
Lou Vicent was extremely close to playing for SA this season.
Lou and I had had a chat today, he really enjoys the faster bouncier
wickets in Australia, and his batting efforts here vindicate that.
And yes he wants a stint back in Australia.

Mason and Martin looked very quick in the nets, but the best of them
was Mills who bowls about 15 km slower but got good bounce and movement.
Of the batsman, none stood out today.

As for the Aussies do we risk Roy ?

Re: AU V NZ ADELAIDE OVAL 14/12/07 o/d game

PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 5:33 pm
by stan
mal wrote:Appears to be one sided but on a flatter track NZ can be competitive
In Ross Taylor and Jacob ORgasAM they have 2 wonderful later order hitters
Much depends on Lou Vincent to kick start thier innings.
Kyle Mills is a very underated bowler.

Watched the Kiwis all day today, fielding drills and then the nets.
Lou Vicent was extremely close to playing for SA this season.
Lou and I had had a chat today, he really enjoys the faster bouncier
wickets in Australia, and his batting efforts here vindicate that.
And yes he wants a stint back in Australia.

Mason and Martin looked very quick in the nets, but the best of them
was Mills who bowls about 15 km slower but got good bounce and movement.
Of the batsman, none stood out today.

As for the Aussies do we risk Roy ?



Never underestimate the hatered that NZ have for Australia...
They will be competative without a doubt. There batsmen will find something over here, they always do.

Re: AU V NZ ADELAIDE OVAL 14/12/07 o/d game

PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 8:30 pm
by Keefy
Looking at the TV guide for tomorrow's game, it looks like only the first 2 hours of the match is televised here in Adelaide.

Looks like i'll have to load up Cricket TV on the 3 mobile to get the full coverage. Unfortunately I can't make it tomorrow has have other committments for several hours after work.

Re: AU V NZ ADELAIDE OVAL 14/12/07 o/d game

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:17 am
by locky801
Rain is evidently on the way, (believe it when I see it) so might be yet another shortened match

Re: AU V NZ ADELAIDE OVAL 14/12/07 o/d game

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:19 am
by Dirko
locky801 wrote:Rain is evidently on the way, (believe it when I see it) so might be yet another shortened match


What's rain ?? Tait to bowl with heat after the Kiwi's have questioned his action...

Re: AU V NZ ADELAIDE OVAL 14/12/07 o/d game

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:02 am
by blink
Should be an interesting series. Australia will regain the trophy though, after the 3-0 whitewash spanking that they received in NZ. Neither Ponting or Symonds were available for that series, so their inclusions are massive for Australia.

Does anyone know if Bond, Shane Bond will be fit to play in any of these three matches??

Re: AU V NZ ADELAIDE OVAL 14/12/07 o/d game

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:41 am
by mal
blink wrote:Should be an interesting series. Australia will regain the trophy though, after the 3-0 whitewash spanking that they received in NZ. Neither Ponting or Symonds were available for that series, so their inclusions are massive for Australia.

Does anyone know if Bond, Shane Bond will be fit to play in any of these three matches??


Someone who looked like Shane Bond batted in the nets yesterday.
I didnt see him bowl and I watched nearly all the net sessions.
Dont tell me hes injured, must be the christian name....

Re: AU V NZ ADELAIDE OVAL 14/12/07 o/d game

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:54 am
by RustyCage
mal wrote:
blink wrote:Should be an interesting series. Australia will regain the trophy though, after the 3-0 whitewash spanking that they received in NZ. Neither Ponting or Symonds were available for that series, so their inclusions are massive for Australia.

Does anyone know if Bond, Shane Bond will be fit to play in any of these three matches??


Someone who looked like Shane Bond batted in the nets yesterday.
I didnt see him bowl and I watched nearly all the net sessions.
Dont tell me hes injured, must be the christian name....


Bond tore a muscle in some part of his body just before the series so will be a no show. Sad because he is the best non Australian fast bowler in the world.

Re: AU V NZ ADELAIDE OVAL 14/12/07 o/d game

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 12:06 pm
by mal
AU $1-22
NZ $4-00
TAB sportsbet
Nearly tempted to back NZ with tornado TAYLOR + Jacob ORgasAM in the line up

Re: AU V NZ ADELAIDE OVAL 14/12/07 o/d game

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 12:30 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
$2.75 NZ to hit more sixes great value

Re: AU V NZ ADELAIDE OVAL 14/12/07 o/d game

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 12:59 pm
by mal
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:$2.75 NZ to hit more sixes great value


Should be

AU $1-40
ORgasAM $2-75

Re: AU V NZ ADELAIDE OVAL 14/12/07 o/d game

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 5:10 pm
by blink
Jake the Muss has been in for 25 deliveries and only hit one 4....

He had better start doing something!

Re: AU V NZ ADELAIDE OVAL 14/12/07 o/d game

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 5:54 pm
by rod_rooster
NZ 7/254 after their 50 overs. Nowhere near enough IMHO. Aussies will reel that in without a worry in the world. Had Shane Bond been playing it might be a different story but unfortunately for the Kiwis, Bond is more injury prone than our good friend Watto.

PS - Watch for this comment to come back and bite me on the ar5e later tonight if the Kiwis get up :lol:

Re: AU V NZ ADELAIDE OVAL 14/12/07 o/d game

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 6:44 pm
by locky801
rod_rooster wrote:NZ 7/254 after their 50 overs. Nowhere near enough IMHO. Aussies will reel that in without a worry in the world. Had Shane Bond been playing it might be a different story but unfortunately for the Kiwis, Bond is more injury prone than our good friend Watto.

PS - Watch for this comment to come back and bite me on the ar5e later tonight if the Kiwis get up :lol:




I thought that it was you or me that was more injury prone, just we dont hit the headlines cause we have retired :D

Re: AU V NZ ADELAIDE OVAL 14/12/07 o/d game

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 6:50 pm
by rod_rooster
locky801 wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:NZ 7/254 after their 50 overs. Nowhere near enough IMHO. Aussies will reel that in without a worry in the world. Had Shane Bond been playing it might be a different story but unfortunately for the Kiwis, Bond is more injury prone than our good friend Watto.

PS - Watch for this comment to come back and bite me on the ar5e later tonight if the Kiwis get up :lol:




I thought that it was you or me that was more injury prone, just we dont hit the headlines cause we have retired :D


You might be onto something there locky :lol: I'm not quite retired yet though :wink:

Re: AU V NZ ADELAIDE OVAL 14/12/07 o/d game

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 6:51 pm
by rod_rooster
Well Gilly was smashing them. 51 off 29 balls. Hayden 17 off 17. Ponting and Clarke in now. Aus 2/75 after 9 overs. Should be no problem at all.

Re: AU V NZ ADELAIDE OVAL 14/12/07 o/d game

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 6:52 pm
by locky801
rod_rooster wrote:
locky801 wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:NZ 7/254 after their 50 overs. Nowhere near enough IMHO. Aussies will reel that in without a worry in the world. Had Shane Bond been playing it might be a different story but unfortunately for the Kiwis, Bond is more injury prone than our good friend Watto.

PS - Watch for this comment to come back and bite me on the ar5e later tonight if the Kiwis get up :lol:




I thought that it was you or me that was more injury prone, just we dont hit the headlines cause we have retired :D


You might be onto something there locky :lol: I'm not quite retired yet though :wink:




ahhh so you dye your hair on footy season. thought you looked a lot like Watto but with black hair :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:

Re: AU V NZ ADELAIDE OVAL 14/12/07 o/d game

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 7:00 pm
by rod_rooster
locky801 wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:
locky801 wrote:
rod_rooster wrote:NZ 7/254 after their 50 overs. Nowhere near enough IMHO. Aussies will reel that in without a worry in the world. Had Shane Bond been playing it might be a different story but unfortunately for the Kiwis, Bond is more injury prone than our good friend Watto.

PS - Watch for this comment to come back and bite me on the ar5e later tonight if the Kiwis get up :lol:




I thought that it was you or me that was more injury prone, just we dont hit the headlines cause we have retired :D


You might be onto something there locky :lol: I'm not quite retired yet though :wink:




ahhh so you dye your hair on footy season. thought you looked a lot like Watto but with black hair :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:


Nah, i can bowl better than Watto and i'm no bowler :wink:

Re: AU V NZ ADELAIDE OVAL 14/12/07 o/d game

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 7:14 pm
by locky801
Getting back to reality

Aust 2/91 after 14

Re: AU V NZ ADELAIDE OVAL 14/12/07 o/d game

PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 7:34 pm
by locky801
Australia need 142 runs from 191 balls 8 wickets in hand