Page 1 of 1

Jacques heading over to South Efrica

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 4:55 pm
by stan
Jacques is on his way there due to injuries to ponting, symonds and others.

Heres the article from cricket Austrlia website:

New South Wales opener Phil Jaques has been added to Australia's one-day international squad for the series against South Africa.

With Ricky Ponting struggling with an abdominal strain, the National Selection Panel has opted to fly Jaques in as cover for the reaming four matches.

"As we're two batsmen down for the time being, due to the injuries to Ricky Ponting and Andrew Symonds, the selectors feel it is essential to fly Phil Jaques in as cover," he said.

"There's no doubt Phil's form has been great this Summer and we've every confidence in him if his services are called upon," NSP Chairman, Trevor Hohns said.

Hohns said that a decision on squad numbers will be made when more is known about the nature of Ponting's injury.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 5:58 pm
by Rik E Boy
Should have gone in the first place...

regards,

REB

PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2006 11:22 pm
by RustyCage
He must have inproved his fielding a lot in the space of a week. He should have been in the team from day 1. Trever Hohns is a joke.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 10:33 am
by Blue Boy
This announcement made a day after the domestic one day final - no way that there is a little bit of a conspiracy with the selectors - hmmmmmmm

PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 10:50 am
by Booney
Spot on REB,should have gone in the first place.

Jaques
Gilchrist
Ponting
Hussey
Clarke
Symonds
Katich
Hogg
Lee
Bracken
Tait

PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 10:51 am
by blink
Well they should be giving Shaun Tait a ticket as well to join him over there! I still can't believe the selectors continue to play Mick Lewis, when Tait is over here demolishing arguably the best batting line-up in domestic one-day cricket.

Should Ponting not front for the 2nd ODI, who will bat 1st drop? Surely Gilchrist & Jaques will open, and I guess either Martyn or Katich to come in at 3??

PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 10:57 am
by blink
Booney wrote:Spot on REB,should have gone in the first place.

Jaques
Gilchrist
Ponting
Hussey
Clarke
Symonds
Katich
Hogg
Lee
Bracken
Tait


I 100% agree with the players in your side there Booney!

If i was a selector, I would adjust the order just a bit:

Gilchrist
Jaques
Ponting
Clarke
Symonds
Katich
Hussey
Watson
Hogg
Lee
Tait

12th Man Bracken

I have to leave Bracken out to make way for Watson/Tait, but should one dip in form, Bracken in straight away. Also if a seaming pitch, drop Hogg for Bracken, but i still think they should go in with Hogg 100% of the time.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 12:08 pm
by Booney
I dont rate Watson at all.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 12:33 pm
by MW
Booney wrote:I dont rate Watson at all.


Good to see we agree on something Booney

PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 12:34 pm
by Maddogmike
If Brad Hogg leads Australia's spin attack into the 2007 World Cup We are in big trouble.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 12:38 pm
by MW
Maddogmike wrote:If Brad Hogg leads Australia's spin attack into the 2007 World Cup We are in big trouble.


Besides Warne who will obviously not play, who else could fill the position? Cullen is too young and inexperienced unless they put him in the ODI side right now. Please do not say Cameron White otherwise I may just throw up.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 2:27 pm
by blink
Booney wrote:I dont rate Watson at all.


I rate him higher than Bracken. I can see where you are coming from though. I think Watson gets in ahead only on his batting skills.

As for the Hogg issue, who would be a better replacement? MacGill springs to mind, but the selectors obviously will over look him for shite "spinner" in Cameron White. Bring in Cullen ASAP I say.

PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 2:55 pm
by Booney
blink wrote:
Booney wrote:I dont rate Watson at all.


I rate him higher than Bracken. I can see where you are coming from though. I think Watson gets in ahead only on his batting skills.

As for the Hogg issue, who would be a better replacement? MacGill springs to mind, but the selectors obviously will over look him for shite "spinner" in Cameron White. Bring in Cullen ASAP I say.


Shane Watson

Test: Batting
M I Runs NO Avg HS 0s 50s 100s SR C St
3 4 81 0 20.25 31 0 0 0 38.2 - -
Recent scores: 31, 24, 10, 16. [20.25]

For his batting then hey? pffft

PostPosted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 3:49 pm
by blink
Shane Watson - ODI's:

Mat Inns no Runs HS Ave SR
41 26 11 476 77* 31.73 70.41

Fair enough his test record sucks, but fair go he has only played 4 digs. In ODI's his record is a little better. Not bad too for a bloke coming in at 7 or 8 most of the time. His domestic record is even better.