Page 1 of 7
SA v Tas

Posted:
Thu Feb 07, 2008 4:29 pm
by Thiele
4 day game starts tomorrow and 1 day Wednesday
Re: SA v Tas

Posted:
Fri Feb 08, 2008 9:09 am
by jackpot jim
With cool and overcast conditions leading into this match there may be a bit of Greeness and a bit more moisture than NorMAL in the Pitch. Interesting to see what the Toss Winning Captain does.

I Feel another Redback Capitulation is on the cards with the Bat if they Bat 1st although they are signifigantly strengthened without Adcock.

Re: SA v Tas

Posted:
Fri Feb 08, 2008 9:17 am
by Bob Loblaw
weather also means we will probably play 4 quicks?
anyone in the top order who bowls part time spin now that adcocks gone?
Re: SA v Tas

Posted:
Fri Feb 08, 2008 9:26 am
by Rik E Boy
The Tigers have struggled to bowl out sides this season so perhaps some runs might be on the cards for the Redbacks batsmen.......maybe.
regards,
REB
Re: SA v Tas

Posted:
Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:55 am
by Bob Loblaw
SA 2/13
here we go again...
Re: SA v Tas

Posted:
Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:03 am
by rod_rooster
SA 2/15
Elliott c. Birt b. Geeves 13
Cosgrove lbw. Geeves 0
Harris not out 1
Ferguson not out 0
Re: SA v Tas

Posted:
Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:05 am
by rod_rooster
Bob Loblaw wrote:weather also means we will probably play 4 quicks?
anyone in the top order who bowls part time spin now that adcocks gone?
Dan Cullen in the side. No Cleary.
FFS why drop Cleary? Easily as good a bowler as Rofe and he can bat. Makes no sense at all
Re: SA v Tas

Posted:
Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:05 am
by westcoastpanther
Deitz at 6 is a good move. Hopefully he can get settled with the old ball and make a big one today. Could still be a new one though....
Fergs also needs a score today. Returned to the side in good nick but has had a couple of failures since.
Re: SA v Tas

Posted:
Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:06 am
by westcoastpanther
rod_rooster wrote:Bob Loblaw wrote:weather also means we will probably play 4 quicks?
anyone in the top order who bowls part time spin now that adcocks gone?
Dan Cullen in the side. No Cleary.
FFS why drop Cleary? Easily as good a bowler as Rofe and he can bat. Makes no sense at all
Agreed, ridiculous decision....
Re: SA v Tas

Posted:
Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:07 am
by rod_rooster
westcoastpanther wrote:Deitz at 6 is a good move.
Agree with that.
Mal will be very very pleased

Re: SA v Tas

Posted:
Fri Feb 08, 2008 11:40 am
by westcoastpanther
Over 14.5: Duval to Ferguson, FOUR, what a blistering stroke! pitched up and Ferguson murders it to the deep cover point rope
Love some of their commentart!!
Another failure for Herb in the 4 day game. Could he be in danger of making way so the Plant can be re-potted.....Time to give some of these guys a go I think, can't make the final so nothing to lose.
Re: SA v Tas

Posted:
Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:01 pm
by NFC
Why was Cleary dropped? JOKE!

Re: SA v Tas

Posted:
Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:04 pm
by schimma
NFC wrote:Why was Cleary dropped? JOKE!

because he was playing to well. think the saca are trying to finish dead last and move the side to the Gold Coast. (Eg Major League the movie style)
Re: SA v Tas

Posted:
Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:13 pm
by locky801
rod_rooster wrote:SA 2/15
Elliott c. Birt b. Geeves 13
Cosgrove lbw. Geeves 0
Harris not out 1
Ferguson not out 0
And I had just been reading a media story where Cosgrove was due for a big score, reckon he and RR's best mate Watto are on par for the most ducks in a season

Re: SA v Tas

Posted:
Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:17 pm
by schimma
South Australia 1st innings R M B 4s 6s SR
MTG Elliott c Birt b Geeves 13 17 17 2 0 76.47
DJ Harris not out 25 101 72 4 0 34.72
MJ Cosgrove lbw b Geeves 0 2 2 0 0 0.00
CJ Ferguson not out 35 78 59 6 0 59.32
Extras (lb 1, w 1, nb 2) 4
Total (2 wickets; 24.4 overs) 77 (3.12 runs per over)
Did not bat DT Christian, SA Deitz, GA Manou, RJ Harris, JN Gillespie, DJ Cullen, PC Rofe
Fall of wickets1-13 (Elliott, 5.1 ov), 2-13 (Cosgrove, 5.3 ov)
Bowling O M R W Econ
BW Hilfenhaus 7 1 21 0 3.00
B Geeves 8 4 10 2 1.25 (2nb)
CJ Duval 4 0 18 0 4.50 (1w)
LR Butterworth 3.4 1 14 0 3.81
JJ Krejza 2 1 13 0 6.50
Re: SA v Tas

Posted:
Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:21 pm
by westcoastpanther
3/77 Fergs bowled by a Butterworth jaffa!! Limp to 200 now.....
Re: SA v Tas

Posted:
Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:26 pm
by NFC
westcoastpanther wrote:3/77 Fergs bowled by a Butterworth jaffa!! Limp to 200 now.....
Ferg's average.
Re: SA v Tas

Posted:
Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:33 pm
by locky801
Fergy always seems to get a solid start but we need big hundreds from him not just between 30 and 70, obviously has the potential just has to work alot harder on concentration one thinks

Re: SA v Tas

Posted:
Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:45 pm
by westcoastpanther
NFC wrote:westcoastpanther wrote:3/77 Fergs bowled by a Butterworth jaffa!! Limp to 200 now.....
Ferg's average.
Says the man who wakes up hangin out of Watto.......

Re: SA v Tas

Posted:
Fri Feb 08, 2008 1:05 pm
by MagicKiwi
Mark Cleary must be wondering what he has to do.