odi game 3 australia v sri lanka

well will this game get washed out ? some chance you'd think 

hearts on fire wrote:this odi series is a waste of time, a possible 3 wash outs in the first 3 games. We are going to be left with each side playing each other once, maybe not even that.
GWW wrote:Think i heard somewhere that if we dont make the finals of this one day tournament we lose the number 1 one day ranking to Sri Lanka.
stan wrote:hearts on fire wrote:this odi series is a waste of time, a possible 3 wash outs in the first 3 games. We are going to be left with each side playing each other once, maybe not even that.
But hey at least we are getting rain.
rod_rooster wrote:Murali just copped one right in the teeth. Might make an improvement![]()
Might have to go to a dentist for the first time![]()
smithy wrote:Australia 3/140
32 overs
Gilly 61 LBW to a ball that pitched well outside off to a delivery bowled from wide around the wicket.
Does the ball have to PITCH in line with the stumps or HIT in line with the stumps?
My understanding is that you can't (shouldn't) be given out LBW playing a shot to a ball that PITCHES outside the line.
redden whites wrote:smithy wrote:Australia 3/140
32 overs
Gilly 61 LBW to a ball that pitched well outside off to a delivery bowled from wide around the wicket.
Does the ball have to PITCH in line with the stumps or HIT in line with the stumps?
My understanding is that you can't (shouldn't) be given out LBW playing a shot to a ball that PITCHES outside the line.
Better grab a rule book ol son
smithy wrote:
Gilly 61 LBW to a ball that pitched well outside off to a delivery bowled from wide around the wicket.
My understanding is that you can't (shouldn't) be given out LBW playing a shot to a ball that PITCHES outside the line.
I have, I'm sorryredden whites wrote:smithy wrote:
Gilly 61 LBW to a ball that pitched well outside off to a delivery bowled from wide around the wicket.
My understanding is that you can't (shouldn't) be given out LBW playing a shot to a ball that PITCHES outside the line.
better have a re-read