Page 1 of 4
England in India

Posted:
Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:59 pm
by brod
England had a couple of warm up games, one a LOT better than the other
ENGLAND XI vs MUMBAI (England XI won by 122 runs)
England XI 4/297A Flintoff 100*
OA Shah 83
IR Bell 58
Mumbai 8/175JM Anderson 3/15
SR Patel 2/38
MUMBAI CRICKET ASSOCIATION XI vs ENGLAND XI (Mumbai Cricket Ass won by 124 runs)
Mumbai CA XI 7/222SJ Harmison 2/38
SR Patel 2/50
England XI 98
GP Swann 24*
JM Anderson 20
(34 for the 10th wicket)
Re: England in India

Posted:
Fri Nov 14, 2008 9:10 pm
by brod
India vs England
1st ODIIndia lead 7 match series 1-0India won by 158 runsIndia 5/387Yuvraj Singh 138* (78 balls) 16 fours 6 sixes
V Sehwag 85 (73)
G Gambhir 51 (63)
SK Raina 43 (44)
MS Dohni 39 (32)
RG Sharma 11* (8)
YK Pathan 0 (2)
SJ Harmison 2/75 (10 overs)
SR Patel 2/78 (9)
A Flintoff 1/67 (10)
PD Collingwood 0/15 (1)
KP Pietersen 0/16 (2)
JM Anderson 0/52 (8)
SCJ Broad 0/74 (10)
England 229 (37.4 overs)KP Pietersen 63 (56 balls)
RS Bopara 54* (38) 2 fours 5 sixes
SR Patel 28 (28)
SCJ Broad 26 (25)
IR Bell 25 (35)
PD Collingwood 19 (23)
A Flintoff 4 (3)
MJ Prior 4 (9)
SJ Harmison 0 (0)
OA Shah 0 (5)
JM Anderson 0 (4)
Z Khan 3/26 (7 overs)
MM Patel 1/20 (6)
RP Singh 1/25 (4)
YK Pathan 1/41 (3.4)
Harbhajan Singh 1/47 (8)
V Sehwag 1/68 (9)
Re: England in India

Posted:
Fri Nov 14, 2008 9:11 pm
by stampy
reading the scorecard you might think its india v inda A

Re: England in India

Posted:
Thu Nov 27, 2008 5:48 pm
by the joker
England are going home after the bombs last night. spewing they wont lose the onedayers 7 nil and tests 2 nil

Re: England in India

Posted:
Thu Nov 27, 2008 6:00 pm
by rod_rooster
The events in Mumbai are not something to be taken lightly. England doing the right thing in leaving. Hopefully there are no more lives lost in India as a result of the current situation.
Re: England in India

Posted:
Thu Nov 27, 2008 7:45 pm
by the joker
rod_rooster wrote:The events in Mumbai are not something to be taken lightly. England doing the right thing in leaving. Hopefully there are no more lives lost in India as a result of the current situation.
dont take my comments that way. of coarse the bombs are bad. all i was saying is that it would have been good to see the poms get smashed with the ashes closing in fast
Re: England in India

Posted:
Thu Nov 27, 2008 8:43 pm
by rod_rooster
the joker wrote:rod_rooster wrote:The events in Mumbai are not something to be taken lightly. England doing the right thing in leaving. Hopefully there are no more lives lost in India as a result of the current situation.
dont take my comments that way. of coarse the bombs are bad. all i was saying is that it would have been good to see the poms get smashed with the ashes closing in fast
Fair enough. I wasn't so much taking what you said the wrong way i could just see this opening up into a thread that was very distasteful.
Re: England in India

Posted:
Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:04 am
by brod
Back to the cricket
INDIA vs ENGLAND
1st TestStumps Day One
ENGLAND 5/229 (2.54 RPO)
AJ Strauss 123
AN Cook 52
IR Bell 17
KP Pietersen 4
PD Collingwood 9
A Flintoff 18*
JM Anderson 2*
Z Khan 2/36
Harbhajan Singh 2/67
A Mishra 1/63
England have brought in debutant Graeme Swann, the off break bowler from Notts, 9 years after he was in the England squad for a test against NZ, without making the final XI.
Re: England in India

Posted:
Fri Dec 12, 2008 8:09 am
by rod_rooster
brod wrote:Back to the cricket
INDIA vs ENGLAND
1st TestStumps Day One
ENGLAND 5/229 (2.54 RPO)
AJ Strauss 123
AN Cook 52
IR Bell 17
KP Pietersen 4
PD Collingwood 9
A Flintoff 18*
JM Anderson 2*
Z Khan 2/36
Harbhajan Singh 2/67
A Mishra 1/63
England have brought in debutant Graeme Swann, the off break bowler from Notts, 9 years after he was in the England squad for a test against NZ, without making the final XI.
So it appears as though England are using a nightwatchman to protect the number 7 batsman

That is unless Anderson is geniunley batting at 7 which simply couldn't be the case surely.
Re: England in India

Posted:
Fri Dec 12, 2008 8:42 am
by Rik E Boy
Not too happy with the lack of coverage on FOX. Has the BCCI tried to get the execs to giftwrap their balls as part of the rights deal? Last night we had ******* Poker on while the Poms were doing battle against India. **** sake the novelty has worn off watching Poker. Put the ******* Cricket on you dipshits.
regards,
REB
Re: England in India

Posted:
Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:01 pm
by brod
rod_rooster wrote:brod wrote:Back to the cricket
INDIA vs ENGLAND
1st TestStumps Day One
ENGLAND 5/229 (2.54 RPO)
AJ Strauss 123
AN Cook 52
IR Bell 17
KP Pietersen 4
PD Collingwood 9
A Flintoff 18*
JM Anderson 2*
Z Khan 2/36
Harbhajan Singh 2/67
A Mishra 1/63
England have brought in debutant Graeme Swann, the off break bowler from Notts, 9 years after he was in the England squad for a test against NZ, without making the final XI.
So it appears as though England are using a nightwatchman to protect the number 7 batsman

That is unless Anderson is geniunley batting at 7 which simply couldn't be the case surely.
Prior would have to batting ahead of him
Re: England in India

Posted:
Fri Dec 12, 2008 1:34 pm
by MAY-Z
Rik E Boy wrote:Not too happy with the lack of coverage on FOX. Has the BCCI tried to get the execs to giftwrap their balls as part of the rights deal? Last night we had f****** Poker on while the Poms were doing battle against India. f*** sake the novelty has worn off watching Poker. Put the f****** Cricket on you dipshits.
regards,
REB
its on setanta sports - not sure weather fox sports didnt bid or whether setanta get first choice.
Re: England in India

Posted:
Fri Dec 12, 2008 2:21 pm
by silicone skyline
It was on while I was in Thailand. Super Sports 2!
Agree REB. Poker has done it's dash and needs to be dealt out.
What about celebrity poker? How boring is that?
Give me Poms battling the Punjab's any day.
Re: England in India

Posted:
Fri Dec 12, 2008 3:44 pm
by Rik E Boy
MAY-Z wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:Not too happy with the lack of coverage on FOX. Has the BCCI tried to get the execs to giftwrap their balls as part of the rights deal? Last night we had f****** Poker on while the Poms were doing battle against India. f*** sake the novelty has worn off watching Poker. Put the f****** Cricket on you dipshits.
regards,
REB
its on setanta sports - not sure weather fox sports didnt bid or whether setanta get first choice.
I wish it would just stick to Soccer. I'm not paying for that shit.
regards,
REB
Re: England in India

Posted:
Fri Dec 12, 2008 4:54 pm
by MAY-Z
Rik E Boy wrote:MAY-Z wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:Not too happy with the lack of coverage on FOX. Has the BCCI tried to get the execs to giftwrap their balls as part of the rights deal? Last night we had f****** Poker on while the Poms were doing battle against India. f*** sake the novelty has worn off watching Poker. Put the f****** Cricket on you dipshits.
regards,
REB
its on setanta sports - not sure weather fox sports didnt bid or whether setanta get first choice.
I wish it would just stick to Soccer. I'm not paying for that s***t.
regards,
REB
its actually had quite a bit of cricket on it lately
Re: England in India

Posted:
Fri Dec 12, 2008 5:40 pm
by brod
brod wrote:rod_rooster wrote:brod wrote:Back to the cricket
INDIA vs ENGLAND
1st TestStumps Day One
ENGLAND 5/229 (2.54 RPO)
AJ Strauss 123
AN Cook 52
IR Bell 17
KP Pietersen 4
PD Collingwood 9
A Flintoff 18*
JM Anderson 2*
Z Khan 2/36
Harbhajan Singh 2/67
A Mishra 1/63
England have brought in debutant Graeme Swann, the off break bowler from Notts, 9 years after he was in the England squad for a test against NZ, without making the final XI.
So it appears as though England are using a nightwatchman to protect the number 7 batsman

That is unless Anderson is geniunley batting at 7 which simply couldn't be the case surely.
Prior would have to batting ahead of him
Prior just brought up his 50
Re: England in India

Posted:
Fri Dec 12, 2008 8:03 pm
by brod
INDIA vs ENGLAND
1st Test
Day 2 - Session 3
ENGLAND 316
AJ Strauss 123
MJ Prior 53*
AM Cook 52
Harbhajan Singh 3/96
A Mishra 3/99
Z Khan 2/41
INDIA 3/63 (21 overs)
G Gambhir 19
V Sehwag 9
R Dravid 3
SR Tendulkar 13*
VVS Laxman 14*
GP Swann 2/21
JM Anderson 1/16
Swann took two wickets in his first over in test cricket (Gambhir then Dravid)
Re: England in India

Posted:
Fri Dec 12, 2008 8:30 pm
by wycbloods
brod wrote:INDIA vs ENGLAND
1st Test
Day 2 - Session 3
ENGLAND 316
AJ Strauss 123
MJ Prior 53*
AM Cook 52
Harbhajan Singh 3/96
A Mishra 3/99
Z Khan 2/41
INDIA 3/63 (21 overs)
G Gambhir 19
V Sehwag 9
R Dravid 3
SR Tendulkar 13*
VVS Laxman 14*
GP Swann 2/21
JM Anderson 1/16
Swann took two wickets in his first over in test cricket (Gambhir then Dravid)
The joys of debuting in India as a spinner

Re: England in India

Posted:
Fri Dec 12, 2008 9:04 pm
by brod
India now 5/102, Tendulkar and Laxman both out
Re: England in India

Posted:
Fri Dec 12, 2008 11:08 pm
by brod
INDIA vs ENGLAND
1st Test
Day 2 - Stumps
ENGLAND 316
AJ Strauss 123
MJ Prior 53*
AM Cook 52
Harbhajan Singh 3/96
A Mishra 3/99
Z Khan 2/41
INDIA 6/155 (45 overs)
G Gambhir 19
V Sehwag 9
R Dravid 3
SR Tendulkar 37
VVS Laxman 24
Yuvraj Singh 14
MS Dohni 24*
Harbhajan Singh 13* (6 balls)
GP Swann 2/35 (7 overs)
A Flintoff 1/26
JM Anderson 1/26
SJ Harmison 1/29
MS Panesar 1/30