by smithy » Mon Dec 06, 2010 4:08 pm
by JK » Mon Dec 06, 2010 4:24 pm
by Interceptor » Mon Dec 06, 2010 4:40 pm
by gadj1976 » Mon Dec 06, 2010 5:04 pm
by Interceptor » Mon Dec 06, 2010 5:22 pm
gadj1976 wrote:Surely some mathematician can work out the difference in time the ball was released, versus the time the ball passed the batsman (divided by 22 yards) and work out how fast the delivery was?
SURELY!
by locky801 » Mon Dec 06, 2010 6:43 pm
by GWW » Mon Dec 06, 2010 6:49 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:28 pm
GWW wrote:I'd love to see channel 9 showing some live footage of deliveries as the batsman sees it, they only really do that through slow motion.
by Jimmy » Sat Dec 11, 2010 9:56 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:GWW wrote:I'd love to see channel 9 showing some live footage of deliveries as the batsman sees it, they only really do that through slow motion.
Good point. I went around behind the nets to watch Shaun Tait bowling. There were two nets and a batsman between me and Tait, and I was still flinching. It was rather scary to be honest. I really think a lot of people watching on TV would have no real appreciation of how quick these guys really bowl.
As for Thommo, quickest I've ever seen, without doubt. In the 1974-75 series v England and 1975-76 series v West Indies he bowled like the wind. After injuring his shoulder he was still able to win the quickest bowler in the world competition in Perth in the late 70s.
by am Bays » Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:30 am
by Adelaide Hawk » Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:43 am
by smithy » Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:07 am
Adelaide Hawk wrote:The four quickest bowlers I've seen in Australia since the mid 60s are:
1. Jeff Thomson - unquestionably the quickest and would have easily cracked 170 by today's standards.
2. Shaun Tait
3. Brett Lee
4. Dennis Lillee - prior to his back injury in 1973
You could shuffle the other three around, depending on the day, but Thommo was just a thunderbolt.
There have been others just marginally slower. There was a quick in SA back in the late 60s called Alan Frost who was very swift indeed, toured New Zealand with the Australian 2nd XI, but his career was cut short when they started playing Sheffield Shield Shield on Sundays. Wayne Prior was very quick as well.
by Adelaide Hawk » Mon Dec 13, 2010 5:48 am
smithy wrote:HAWK - I'm interested in your observations on a bowler called Andy Roberts.
From what I've heard he was just as swift as Thommo around the 76-78 period, and the footage of his bouncer hitting Hookesy in the jaw is definitely one sharp delivery.
by Iron Fist » Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:12 am
Jimmy wrote:Adelaide Hawk wrote:GWW wrote:I'd love to see channel 9 showing some live footage of deliveries as the batsman sees it, they only really do that through slow motion.
Good point. I went around behind the nets to watch Shaun Tait bowling. There were two nets and a batsman between me and Tait, and I was still flinching. It was rather scary to be honest. I really think a lot of people watching on TV would have no real appreciation of how quick these guys really bowl.
As for Thommo, quickest I've ever seen, without doubt. In the 1974-75 series v England and 1975-76 series v West Indies he bowled like the wind. After injuring his shoulder he was still able to win the quickest bowler in the world competition in Perth in the late 70s.
In my one and only west end cup game for prossie in 02' (actually the day of the bali bombing) i was lucky enough to be at the non-strikers end vs tait. My partner tickled one to fine leg and we couldn't get a single because it went too bloody quick to the fielder. Luckily, my mate didn't get an opportunity to get a single that over, i honestly couldn't see the ******* thing. We were rolled for about 100 that day. Tait took 5 for about 10.
by JK » Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:32 am
Adelaide Hawk wrote:smithy wrote:HAWK - I'm interested in your observations on a bowler called Andy Roberts.
From what I've heard he was just as swift as Thommo around the 76-78 period, and the footage of his bouncer hitting Hookesy in the jaw is definitely one sharp delivery.
Andy Roberts was the first of the West Indian quick bowlers who terrorised world cricket through the 70s and the 80s. IMHO, rated alongside Malcolm Marshall as the best of the lot. He bowled with great speed, could move the ball both ways, had subtle variation of pace, and had two bouncers .. one quick, one bloody quick. That was what undid Hookesy in WSC. He'd just hit one into the stands, the next one come onto him quicker than he thought.
Andy always had that slight grin on his face, that of a smiling assassin, and I hear he worked as a grave digger in the West Idies ... how apropos![]()
Apparently so far as pace is concerned, we never saw Andy at his quickest in Australia. I hear he was quickest around 1973 and 1974, but he didn't get here until 1975-76. By that time he was flanked by a young Michael Holding who was their quickest bowler. Roberts was around Dennis Lillee pace.
IMHO, the quickest of that group of fast bowlers in the 70s and 80s were Michael Holding and Malcolm Marshall.
by am Bays » Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:44 pm
Iron Fist wrote:I was similar, facing Weeks when iw as at Port a fair few times, he was clocked at 144km but couldnt do that consistently, so say he was bowling about 130, that was still very scary!
You dont even have time to think about what ya doin.
Facing someone like tait bowling 150+ or thommo bowling a possible 170+, i dunno what I would do
thats just ridiculous!
by Iron Fist » Mon Dec 13, 2010 4:52 pm
am Bays wrote:Iron Fist wrote:I was similar, facing Weeks when iw as at Port a fair few times, he was clocked at 144km but couldnt do that consistently, so say he was bowling about 130, that was still very scary!
You dont even have time to think about what ya doin.
Facing someone like tait bowling 150+ or thommo bowling a possible 170+, i dunno what I would do
thats just ridiculous!
Yeah, its "fun" cranking up the bowling machine to 90 mph (145 km/h). It is actually appears faster out of the bowling machine as you aren't watching a hand for a ball, it just appears coming at you...![]()
![]()
I did it one lunchtime 8 years ago when work was 500 m from the cricket oval. 70 mph, realtively easy, 80 mph bloody difficult but you get used to it after a while, however missed more than I hit by being late though. 90 mph no chance. I managed to hit a few by anticipating before it was released where the ball was going given that the machine was set to just bowl in the channel. So just pushing forward and timing it the ball would just fly off the bat - the same with edges. Christ I'd hate to face a "live" bowler who would be varying line and length at 90 mph plus. Fair dinkum you'd just kick your stumps over and walk off...
When you see quality batsmen pulling blokes who are bowling 150 km/h plus you realise just how much of a muppet you are with the bat. With me just as I finished me bat lift, the ball would be smashing into me guts....
by jackpot jim » Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:12 pm
by Adelaide Hawk » Mon Dec 13, 2010 6:24 pm
jackpot jim wrote:It's hard to imagine that Thommo was decisively faster than the fastest bowlers from his era to today. Tait, Lee, Ahktar, Bond, Steyn, Hogg, Dizzy, Prior, all the West Indians etc bowled at extreme speeds at certain stages of their careers.
Im making this statement based on that over the decades, athletes in virtually all sports have become fitter, stronger, faster etc.
Take running & swimming in the Olympics and compare the times from the 70s thru til now.
What seemed ridiculously quick back then is rather slow now.
Look at stats from just about any sport and you'll see how much quicker everything is in the modern era.
Just saying that without decisive proof, it's hard to believe that Thommo was clearly quicker then anyone else from todays era.
by Jimmy » Mon Dec 13, 2010 7:00 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |