amber_fluid wrote:whufc wrote:I guess what I’m trying to say is on the basis of drs it wasn’t that bad a deciscion it was hitting the stumps after all
Is it us and our view of the angle we believe exists that is incorrect.
Where we used to think hitting middle/leg meant missing maybe that was an over estimate of the angle that in reality existed as proven by DRS
Ps AM Bays last paragraph summaries well what I am thinking.
Drs showed it hitting(just) so it’s out.
Stays with umpires decision.
I’m fine with that.
Academically, do you think that, with the displayed trajectory, that the ball-stump contact would have been enough to dislodged one or both bails?
Only reason I ask is that I've seen bails wobble a bit, but stay put, in the past when TV shows that the stumps have been nicked by the ball on the way through to the keeper.