SA Footy

SHOULD we. if we bowl them out below 297 enforce the follow on?

Fair bit of turn for Gaz!

Archer aint a test cricketer. Its called TEST for a reason

Paine with another ridiculous review

Day 1, Broad hits Harris, ball not going over
Day 4, Lyon to Butler, ball bouncing over.

DOC wrote:SHOULD we. if we bowl them out below 297 enforce the follow on?

Honestly don't think we will

DOC wrote:SHOULD we. if we bowl them out below 297 enforce the follow on?

Nah, would prefer England to have to bowl more with the next test starting on Thursday. If we can make a quick 150 and send them in with a few overs to go tonight that would be best IMO.

Take away Lyons contributuon and England would be 8/ 197... need him to lift in 2nd innings for us to succeed. He owes us

northerner wrote:Archer aint a test cricketer. Its called TEST for a reason

Oh the irony!

Must be out of reviews to not review that lbw

daysofourlives wrote:

northerner wrote:Archer aint a test cricketer. Its called TEST for a reason

Oh the irony!

Never seen Paine drop his head. Never heard Paine give the opposition grist for the mill.

When can we get rid of this useless **** of a captain!!!

Uses the review system worse than Shane Watson and when will the dumb **** learn we needs to attack the genuine batsmen more or bring the field allowing for more than one ball at Leach who has proved his not a genuine bunny.

Absolute imbecile!

Nathan lyon 2 for 300 plus is the biggest issue over the past 4 innings.

Ideally have them 1 or 2 down tonight, extended sessions to make up for the lost time hopefully , Warner given licence to tee off

northerner wrote:Nathan lyon 2 for 300 plus is the biggest issue over the past 4 innings.

Rubbish, he got Stokes out when it mattered last Test, not his fault the ******* useless Captain had burnt the reviews.
And again today, it has cost us 5overs and 10 runs which could come back to bite us late on Day 5 when we are trying to bowl them out to win the series.

Next youll be telling us he deserves to go out on his terms. He needs to be dropped for the 5th Test

whufc wrote:When can we get rid of this useless **** of a captain!!!

Uses the review system worse than Shane Watson and when will the dumb **** learn we needs to attack the genuine batsmen more or bring the field allowing for more than one ball at Leach who has proved his not a genuine bunny.

Absolute imbecile!

We are just seeing what would've happened if we ever gave Wato the captaincy

Just when I was getting worried and starting to think the win was slipping away from us with this annoying last wicket partnership Cummins cleans up Buttler who was batting well and bloody hell that was close to a no ball! Thought that was going to be deemed a no ball for sure.

northerner wrote:

daysofourlives wrote:

northerner wrote:Archer aint a test cricketer. Its called TEST for a reason

Oh the irony!

Never seen Paine drop his head. Never heard Paine give the opposition grist for the mill.

You could very well be right but what I do know, is he's not a Test cricketer

daysofourlives wrote:

whufc wrote:When can we get rid of this useless **** of a captain!!!

Uses the review system worse than Shane Watson and when will the dumb **** learn we needs to attack the genuine batsmen more or bring the field allowing for more than one ball at Leach who has proved his not a genuine bunny.

Absolute imbecile!

We are just seeing what would've happened if we ever gave Wato the captaincy

We did

Just lucky it was against India when they were anti drs

https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/122 ... ia-2012-13

WHY ARE YOU SMILING FFS