Re: BBL 21/22
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2022 8:09 pm
Harry would not get a game without his dad.
Armchair expert wrote:Harry would not get a game without his dad.
The Bedge wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Harry would not get a game without his dad.
He’s useless
Armchair expert wrote:Harry would not get a game without his dad.
The Bedge wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Harry would not get a game without his dad.
He’s useless
carey wrote:The Bedge wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Harry would not get a game without his dad.
He’s useless
That was the worst innings I’ve ever seen in BBL cricket.
Eagles2014 wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Harry would not get a game without his dad.
His Dad signed him to three year deal too, would imagine he will be on the list next season and not playing a game. If he doesn’t try and sign De Kock or another decent keeper/batsmen with Carey unavailable it is a deadset joke, almost criminal. How SACA let him have so much power when his son is involved is ridiculous
amber_fluid wrote:Let’s be honest the whole strikers side is rubbish other than Rashid.
Minimum Chips wrote:Eagles2014 wrote:Armchair expert wrote:Harry would not get a game without his dad.
His Dad signed him to three year deal too, would imagine he will be on the list next season and not playing a game. If he doesn’t try and sign De Kock or another decent keeper/batsmen with Carey unavailable it is a deadset joke, almost criminal. How SACA let him have so much power when his son is involved is ridiculous
Unfortunately Eags as we all know the whole place is rotten. When you have a SACA president and board only worried about how deep they can get their snouts in the trough and not do anything to make meaningful changes to the whole set up we'll keep discussing the same things over and over. Absolute joke of an organisation which basically needs a complete clean out from top to bottom and in between, not just the Strikers.
Lightning McQueen wrote:Do we know why Renshaw didn't play?
Trader wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Do we know why Renshaw didn't play?
Covid.
Oh, and as for the siddle no ball, it was close, but seemed very similar to the delivery Kelly got out on, why wasn't that one reviewed as well?
Trader wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Do we know why Renshaw didn't play?
Covid.
Oh, and as for the siddle no ball, it was close, but seemed very similar to the delivery Kelly got out on, why wasn't that one reviewed as well?
amber_fluid wrote:Trader wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Do we know why Renshaw didn't play?
Covid.
Oh, and as for the siddle no ball, it was close, but seemed very similar to the delivery Kelly got out on, why wasn't that one reviewed as well?
Did Wells take the catch though?
They missed with the free hit so no damage done anyway